Advertisement

The Role of Living Labs in Developing Smart Cities in Indonesia

  • Suhono Harso Supangkat
  • Arry Akhmad Arman
  • Yuti Ariani FatimahEmail author
  • Ryan Adhitya Nugraha
  • Hendra Sandhi Firmansyah
Chapter
Part of the S.M.A.R.T. Environments book series (SMARTE)

Abstract

This chapter studies the role of living labs in smart city development in four Indonesian cities: Depok, Semarang, Bekasi and South Tangerang. Since 2012, Indonesian cities have started to incorporate the smart city approach for solving urban problems. One of the main similarities between these cities in implementing the smart city approach is the adoption of information and communication technology to improve public services by making citizens’ applications easier and better traceable. This research showed that despite political and technical support from the national government to develop smart cities, its implementation was obstructed by silos between different institutions and the persistence of non-digital documents, which make them difficult to analyze and share. Through action research in these cities, it was shown that the smart city is best approached as a ‘living lab’, i.e. a continuous-collaboration space between various stakeholders to sense city conditions (needs, problems, future limits) based on real-time data and to react to these conditions accordingly. The analysis showed that one of the success factors for such living labs is to find a balance between social forms of support, for example political, financial or cultural, and technical forms of support, for example infrastructure and technology.

Keywords

Action research Collaborative space Dynamic Living lab 

References

  1. Dutilleul, B., Birrer, F. A., & Mensink, W. (2010). Unpacking European living labs: Analysing innovation’s social dimensions. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4(1).Google Scholar
  2. GSMA. (2017). Maximising the smart cities opportunity: Recommendations for Asia-Pacific policymakers. https://www.gsma.com/iot/maximising-smart-cities-opportunity-recommendations-asia-pacific-policymakers/
  3. IBM. (2009). A vision of smarter cities: How cities can lead the way into a prosperous and sustainable future.Google Scholar
  4. Kim, H. M., & Han, S. S. (2012). City profile: Seoul. Cites, 29(2), 142–154.Google Scholar
  5. Larios, V. M., Gomez, L., Mora, O. B., Maciel, R., & Rosales, N. V. (2016). Living labs for smart cities: A use case in Guadalajara city to foster innovation and develop citizen centered solutions. 2016 IEEE Smart Cities Conferene (ISC2).Google Scholar
  6. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Smart City as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. ICEGOV2011, September 26–28, 2011, Tallinn, Estonia.Google Scholar
  7. Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schuurman, D., Marez, L. D., & Ballon, P. (2016). Living labs: A systematic review. Ghent University. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/7026155/file/7026171
  9. Steen, K., & Van Bueren, E. (2017). Urban living lab: A living lab way of working. Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions.Google Scholar
  10. Stinger, E. T. (2014). Action research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  11. Supangkat, S. H, Arman, A. A., Nugarah, I. G. B., et al. (2015). Pengenalan dan Pengembangan Smart City. Bandung, e-Indonesia Initiatives.Google Scholar
  12. Supangkat, S. H., Arman, A. A., Nugraha, R. A., & Fatimah, Y. A. (2018). The implementation of Garuda Smart City framework for Smart City readiness mapping in Indonesia. アジア太平洋討究, 32, 169–176.Google Scholar
  13. United Nations. (2008). World population prospects: The 2008 revision. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.Google Scholar
  14. Vale, T., Carvalho, E., Souza, M., Raimundo, P., Faria, I., Spinola, R., & Elberzhager. (2018). A mapping study on Living Lab: Characteristics, smart cities initiatives, challenge and software architecture aspect. Third International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing.Google Scholar
  15. Van der Walt, J. S., Buitendag, A. A. K., Zaiman, J. J., & Van Vuren, J. C. J. 2009. Community living lab as a collaborative innovation environment. Informing science and information technology.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suhono Harso Supangkat
    • 1
  • Arry Akhmad Arman
    • 1
  • Yuti Ariani Fatimah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ryan Adhitya Nugraha
    • 1
  • Hendra Sandhi Firmansyah
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Technology BandungBandungIndonesia

Personalised recommendations