Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice ((CEICJ,volume 1))

  • 403 Accesses

Abstract

The comparative research in this work has been driven by two leading questions: (a) In the field of banking investigations, what is a balance between the need to fight crimes and that of protecting human fundamental rights which can be fairly accepted in a democratic society?, and (b) under this perspective, is the current legal framework in the EU adequate? If not, what can be done about it?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cf. Sect. 2.1.

  2. 2.

    And in the EU, in particular, the notion of “undertaking” established by Article 4(1)(1) CRR.

  3. 3.

    Cf. Sect. 5.4.

  4. 4.

    Cf. Sect. 6.1.1 for an analysis in light of the Basel Committee’s Core Principles.

  5. 5.

    Cf. Sects. 6.1.2 (for the US regulatory system) and 6.1.3 (for the Eurozone-Single Supervisory Mechanism).

  6. 6.

    Cf., especially in the EU, Sect. 6.1.3.

  7. 7.

    See above Sects. 6.26.3.

  8. 8.

    The analysis of the national regulations and different authorities acting in this field fall instead out of the remit of this work, cf. Sect. 6.2.

  9. 9.

    Although not necessarily so well protected in case of procedures developed before the entry into force of the Charter, like antitrust proceedings. See Sect. 6.2.

  10. 10.

    For an analysis of the notion of tribunal in administrative punitive matters and the independence requirement, see Sect. 6.3; for the impartiality requirement, see Sect. 6.3.1.

  11. 11.

    Cf. Sects. 6.3.2 and 6.3.3.

  12. 12.

    Cf. Sect. 6.3.56.3.6.

  13. 13.

    Cf. Sect. 6.3.1.

  14. 14.

    Cf. Sect. 6.3.6.

  15. 15.

    Cf. Sect. 6.3.3.

  16. 16.

    Cf. Sect. 4.4.1.

  17. 17.

    Cf. Sect. 4.4.1, referring to the case of Article 4(3) SSM R.

  18. 18.

    Cf. Sect. 6.3.3.

  19. 19.

    For a reconstruction of the development, or rather the involution of the European case-law on the matter of ne bis in idem, see Sects. 2.3.2 and 2.3.3.

  20. 20.

    The critical situations arising under this profile in the SSM legal framework are analysed in Sect. 6.3.7.

  21. 21.

    Cf. Sect. 7.3.

  22. 22.

    Cf. Sects. 7.5 and 7.6.

  23. 23.

    Cf. Sect. 8.2.

  24. 24.

    Cf. Sect. 8.3.

  25. 25.

    Cf. Sect. 8.2, sub 7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing Switzerland and G. Giappichelli Editore

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lasagni, G. (2019). Conclusion. In: Banking Supervision and Criminal Investigation. Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12161-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12161-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12160-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12161-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics