Skip to main content

Evolution of Strigolactone Biosynthesis and Signalling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strigolactones - Biology and Applications
  • 845 Accesses

Abstract

Studying evolutionarily primitive organisms with simpler genomes can provide information about the core genetic machinery required for any biological process, including hormone production and perception. In this chapter, we present findings on strigolactone biology based on work with two model byrophytes, the moss Physcomitrella patens and the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. We summarise the existing knowledge of strigolactone biosynthesis in primitive plants, and discuss the role of strigolactones in regulating growth in response to competition from neighbouring plants. We then turn to strigolactone perception and signal transduction, with a focus on the diversity among putative strigolactone receptors in the KAI2/DWARF14 family of α/β-hydrolases. We speculate on the “original” role for strigolactones for early land plants as a rhizosphere signal, before they were adopted as hormones to regulate development. Finally, we summarise discoveries that explain how strigolactones released by plant roots came to be exploited as germination signals by root-parasitic weeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arite T, Umehara M, Ishikawa S, Hanada A, Maekawa M, Yamaguchi S, Kyozuka J (2009) d14, a strigolactone-insensitive mutant of rice, shows an accelerated outgrowth of tillers. Plant Cell Physiol 50:1416–1424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman JL, Kohchi T, Yamato KT et al (2017) Insights into land plant evolution garnered from the Marchantia polymorpha genome. Cell 171:287–304.e15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bythell-Douglas R, Rothfels CJ, Stevenson DWD, Graham SW, Wong GK-S, Nelson DC, Bennett T (2017) Evolution of strigolactone receptors by gradual neo-functionalization of KAI2 paralogues. BMC Biol 15:52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challis RJ, Hepworth J, Mouchel C, Waites R, Leyser O (2013) A role for MORE AXILLARY GROWTH1 (MAX1) in evolutionary diversity in strigolactone signaling upstream of MAX2. Plant Physiol 161:1885–1902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conn CE, Bythell-Douglas R, Neumann D et al (2015) Convergent evolution of strigolactone perception enabled host detection in parasitic plants. Science 349:540–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delaux P-M, Xie X, Timme RE et al (2012) Origin of strigolactones in the green lineage. New Phytol 195:857–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutjahr C, Gobbato E, Choi J et al (2015) Rice perception of symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi requires the karrikin receptor complex. Science 350:1521–1524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Liu X, Xiong G et al (2013) DWARF 53 acts as a repressor of strigolactone signalling in rice. Nature 504:401–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Obando M, de Villiers R, Hoffmann B et al (2018) Physcomitrella patens MAX2 characterization suggests an ancient role for this F-box protein in photomorphogenesis rather than strigolactone signalling. New Phytol 435:824

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DC, Scaffidi A, Dun EA, Waters MT, Flematti GR, Dixon KW, Beveridge CA, Ghisalberti EL, Smith SM (2011) F-box protein MAX2 has dual roles in karrikin and strigolactone signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:8897–8902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Proust H, Hoffmann B, Xie X, Yoneyama K, Schaefer DG, Yoneyama K, Nogué F, Rameau C (2011) Strigolactones regulate protonema branching and act as a quorum sensing-like signal in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Development 138:1531–1539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scaffidi A, Waters MT, Sun YK, Skelton BW, Dixon KW, Ghisalberti EL, Flematti GR, Smith SM (2014) Strigolactone hormones and their stereoisomers signal through two related receptor proteins to induce different physiological responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 165:1221–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen H, Zhu L, Bu Q-Y, Huq E (2012) MAX2 affects multiple hormones to promote photomorphogenesis. Mol Plant 5:224–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soundappan I, Bennett T, Morffy N, Liang Y, Stanga JP, Abbas A, Leyser O, Nelson DC (2015) SMAX1-LIKE/D53 family members enable distinct MAX2-dependent responses to Strigolactones and Karrikins in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27:3143–3159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toh S, Holbrook-Smith D, Stogios PJ, Onopriyenko O, Lumba S, Tsuchiya Y, Savchenko A, McCourt P (2015) Structure-function analysis identifies highly sensitive strigolactone receptors in Striga. Science 350:203–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker C, Bennett T (2017) Reassessing the evolution of strigolactone synthesis and signalling, biorxiv.org. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2017/12/03/228320.full.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2018

  • Wang L, Wang B, Jiang L et al (2015) Strigolactone signaling in arabidopsis regulates shoot development by targeting D53-Like SMXL repressor proteins for ubiquitination and degradation. Plant Cell 27:3128–3142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waters MT, Nelson DC, Scaffidi A, Flematti GR, Sun YK, Dixon KW, Smith SM (2012) Specialisation within the DWARF14 protein family confers distinct responses to karrikins and strigolactones in Arabidopsis. Development 139:1285–1295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waters MT, Gutjahr C, Bennett T, Nelson DC (2017) Strigolactone signaling and evolution. Annu Rev Plant Biol 68:291–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Miyakawa T, Nosaki S et al (2018) Structural analysis of HTL and D14 proteins reveals the basis for ligand selectivity in Striga. Nat Commun 9:3947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoneyama K, Mori N, Sato T et al (2018a) Conversion of carlactone to carlactonoic acid is a conserved function of MAX1 homologs in strigolactone biosynthesis. New Phytol 111:18084

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoneyama K, Xie X, Yoneyama K, Kisugi T, Nomura T, Nakatani Y, Akiyama K, McErlean CSP (2018b) Which are the major players, canonical or non-canonical strigolactones? J Exp Bot 111:18084

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F, Lin Q, Zhu L et al (2013) D14-SCFD3-dependent degradation of D53 regulates strigolactone signalling. Nature 504:406–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Waters .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Glossary

Bryophytes

an informal, paraphyletic group of non-vascular land plants that includes the liverworts, mosses, and hornworts.

Embryophytes

all terrestrial plants (including those that are secondarily aquatic), a group that emerged within the streptophytes.

Homologue

a gene copy related by descent to another gene copy. Such a relationship is inferred on the basis of sequence similarity. A gene may have homologues within a species or between species or both. Homologues may be orthologues or paralogues.

Lycophytes

one of the earliest groups of tracheophytes that have microphyllous leaves (small leaves with a single vein).

Monilophytes

the true ferns with megaphyllous leaves (large leaves with multiple, branched veins).

Neofunctionalisation

after gene duplication to produce two paralogues, an evolutionary process whereby one paralogue undergoes mutation to create a new function that was not present in the ancestral gene, allowing the second gene copy to retain the original function. In contrast with subfunctionalisation.

Orthologue

a gene copy that is separated from related sequence by a speciation event. That is, a gene in species A is more closely related to a gene in species B than it is to another gene in species A. The two orthologues arose from a gene duplication event that predated the speciation of A and B. Orthologues often have similar functions in both species.

Paralogue

a gene copy that is not separated from a related sequence by a speciation event. That is, two genes in species A are more closely related to one another than they are to similar sequences in species B. Paralogues arise through a gene duplication event that happened recently within one or both species A and B but after they speciated. Paralogues may indicate that there is functional redundancy or, given enough evolutionary time and selection pressure, functional specialisation.

Seed plants

also known as spermatophytes. Plants that bear seeds, namely, angiosperms (flowering plants) and gymnosperms (conifers and allies).

Streptophytes

the collection of all land plants and the immediate sister group to land plants, namely, the charophyte algae.

Subfunctionalisation

after gene duplication, an evolutionary process whereby each paralogue adopts a different function from each other, when both functions were previously performed by the single ancestral gene. Thus, each paralogue has now become specialised in function from a more generalist ancestor.

Tracheophytes

vascular plants, which conduct water from the roots along vascular strands or tracheids.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bonhomme, S., Waters, M. (2019). Evolution of Strigolactone Biosynthesis and Signalling. In: Koltai, H., Prandi, C. (eds) Strigolactones - Biology and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12153-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics