Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Microorganisms as Sanitary State Bioindicators of Flowing Waters in Poland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Polish River Basins and Lakes – Part II

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 87))

  • 398 Accesses

Abstract

The article presents changes in the quantitative and qualitative composition of indicator bacteria in three Polish rivers – Vistula, Oder, and Łyna River – in the last 30 years. The analyzed rivers are situated in the catchment area of the Baltic Sea, and they play important economic, tourist and environmental roles. The sanitary and bacteriological status of these ecosystems was determined based on the counts of total coliform bacteria (TCB), fecal coliform bacteria (FCB), fecal enterococci bacteria (FEB), and Escherichia coli. The study involved a review of the literature and the reports published by Polish inspectorates of environmental protection. Water samples collected from all rivers in urban areas were characterized by the highest TCB, FCB, FEB, and E. coli counts throughout the analyzed period. High contamination levels contributed to epidemiological risks in rivers, in particular in the proximity of discharge points of treated effluents. As a result, most of the analyzed water samples were graded as purity class III and/or as non-class (polluted beyond permissible standards) waters. Since 2003, Polish laws have been harmonized with the provisions of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), and the range of indicator bacteria was restricted to FEB and E. coli only in water bodies used as sources of water for human consumption and/or for bathing. In Poland, treated wastewater does not have to be disinfected before it is discharged to surface waters. For this reason, contamination with indicator bacteria (TCB, FCB, FEB, and E. coli) continues to be high in water bodies that act as receptacles of wastewater despite considerable reduction of microbiological contamination (97–99%) in treated effluents. The above applies particularly to rivers where contamination spreads. For this reason, the concentration of indicator bacteria should be the main criterion in evaluations of river water purity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Glińska-Lewczuk K, Gołaś I, Koc J et al (2016) The impact of urban areas on the water quality gradient along a lowland river. Environ Monit Assess 188:624–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5638-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gołaś I (2011) The effects of anthropogenic and environmental factors on the bacteriological quality of water in the upper reach of the Drwęca River. Dissertations and monographs 163. Publishing House of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gotkowska-Płachta A, Gołaś I, Korzeniewska E et al (2016) Evaluation of the distribution of fecal indicator bacteria in a river system depending on different types of land use in the southern watershed of the Baltic Sea. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:4073–4085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4442-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kacar A (2011) Analysis of spatial and temporal variation in the levels of microbial fecal indicators in the major rivers flowing into the Aegean Sea, Turkey. Ecol Indic 11:1360–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma L, Mao G, Liu J et al (2016) Spatial temporal changes of bacterioplankton community along an Exhorheic River. Front Microbiol 7:250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harnisz M, Gołaś I, Pietruk M (2011) Tetracycline-resistant bacteria as indicators of antimicrobial resistance in protected waters – the example of the Drwęca River nature reserve (Poland). Ecol Indic 11:663–6682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.09.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Korzeniewska E, Harnisz M (2012) Culture-dependent and culture independent methods in evaluation of emission of Enterobacteriaceae from sewage to the air and surface water. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:4039–4046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1171-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodrigues V, Ramaiah N, Kakti S, Samant D (2011) Long-term variations in abundance and distribution of sewage pollution indicator and human pathogenic bacteria along the central west coast of India. Ecol Indic 11:318–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.05.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schippmann B, Schernewski G, Gräwea U (2013) Escherichia coli pollution in a Baltic Sea lagoon: a model-based source and spatial risk assessment. Int J Hyg Environ Health 216:408–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Małecka M, Donderski W (2006) Heterotrophic bacteria inhibiting water of the River Brda on the Bydgoszcz town. Balt Coast Zone J Ecol Protect Coast 10:31–46

    Google Scholar 

  11. USEPA (2002) Implementation guidance for ambient water quality criteria for bacteria. EPA-823-B-02-003. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization (WHO) (2001) Bathing water quality and human health: faecal pollution. Outcome of an expert consultation. World Health Organization, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  13. Water Framework Directive (WFD) (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. J Eur Union

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gotkowska-Płachta A, Niewolak S, Korzeniewska E (2003) Vertical distribution and seasonal changes in the number of bacterioplankton in the water of Lake Hańcza, particularly in the period of reservoir summer stratification. EJPAU Ser Environ Dev 6:2

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gotkowska-Płachta A, Niewolak S, Korzeniewska E (2005) Pollution degree and sanitary state indicator bacteria as the indicators of the purity of Lake Hańcza waters. Arch Environ Prot 31(2):53–68

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vistula River. http://www.m188.webd.pl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=64&Itemi=64. Accessed 7 Mar 2015

  17. Vistula River (2001) Vistula – the last wild river of modern Europe. http://www.ekologia.pl/srodowisko/ochrona-srodowiska/wisla-ostatnia-dzika-rzeka-wspolczesnej-europy-ekologiczne-znaczenie-wisly,435.html. Accessed Feb 2001

  18. Dubicki A, Radczuk L, Adynkiewicz-Piragas M et al (2005) Surface waters. Ecophysiographic report for the region of Lower Silesia. Regional Urban Planning Office, Wrocław. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  19. IMS-Odra – monitoring data from the Odra river basin. http://www.mkoo.pl/index.php?mid=2&lang=PL. Accessed 12 Jan 2008

  20. Kowalewski Z (2006) Floods in Poland – types, frequency and protection systems. Water-environment-rural areas. Institute of Land Improvement and Grasslands, Falenty 6, 1(16), pp 207–22. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrzejczak E, Kędziora R, Kozar-Makocka H et al (2002) Environmental report. City report. Szczecin City Office, Szczecin. [in Polish]. http://www.szczecin.pl/swiat/raport2002/srodowisko/stan.htm

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bożek A, Dubicki A, Dziewanowski M, Kwiatkowska-Szygulska B (2002) Surface waters. In: Smolnicki K, Szykasiuk M (eds) Environmental report for the city of Wrocław 2002. A.P.W. Bierońscy, Wrocław, pp 50–65. [in Polish]. http://docplayer.pl/8676184-Informator-o-stanie-srodowiska-wroclawia-2002.html

    Google Scholar 

  23. Glińska-Lewczuk K, Burandt P (2011) Effect of river straightening on the hydrochemical properties of floodplain lakes: observations from the Lyna and Drwęca Rivers, N Poland. Ecol Eng 37:786–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.07.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kalinowski A (2011) The issue of the snowmelt flooding on post-glacial rivers based on the example of the Lyna River. In: Glińska-Lewczuk K (ed) Issues of landscape conservation and water management in rural areas. Contemporary problems of management and environmental protection, vol 7. University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, pp 203–220. http://www.uwm.edu.pl/environ/vol07/vol07_chapter15.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  25. Budzyńska D (2012) Environmental report for the Region of Warmia and Mazury, 2011. Environmental Protection Inspectorate. Regional inspectorate of environmental protection in Olsztyn. Environmental Monitoring Library, Olsztyn. [in Polish]. http://arc.wfosigw.olsztyn.pl/pliki/raport_2011.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  26. Natura 2000 network of nature protection areas. http://natura2000.gdos.gov.pl/natura2000/pl/%20proste.php. Accessed 29 Sept 2015

  27. Donderski W, Wilk I (2002) The sanitary state of water in the Vistula river between Wyszogród and Toruń. Pol J Environ Stud 11(5):509–515

    Google Scholar 

  28. An evaluation of the surface waters in the Region of Western Pomerania (2012) In: Lands-berg M (ed) Environmental report for the region of Western Pomerania, 2011. Regional Inspectorate of Environmental Protection, Szczecin, pp 30–93. [in Polish]. https://www.wios.szczecin.pl/bip/files/4780126ACCBB4B60B164E13E30BFA5A7/Ocena%20stanu%20w%C3%B3d.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  29. Daczkowska-Kozon E, Brzostek-Nowakowska J (2001) Campylobacter spp. in waters of three main Western Pomerania water bodies. Int J Hyg Environ Health 203:435–443. https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Polish Standard PN-74/C-04620/02. Water and wastewater. Sampling of surface water for the physical, chemical and bacteriological analysis. [In Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  31. APHA (1992) In: Greenberg AE, Clesceri LS, Eaton AD (eds) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. Washington

    Google Scholar 

  32. Polish Standard PN-75/C-04615/05. Water and wastewater. Microbiological assays. Determination of coliform bacteria with the test-tube fermentation method. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  33. Polish Standard PN-EN ISO 9308-1:2004. Water quality. Detection and enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria. Part 1: membrane filtration method. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  34. Polish Standard PN-EN ISO 9308-1:2004/AC:2009. Water quality. Detection and enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria. Part 1: Membrane filtration method. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  35. Polish Standard PN-75/C-04615/07. Water and wastewater. Microbiological assays. Determination of fecal coliform bacteria with the test-tube fermentation method. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  36. Polish Standard PN-82/C-04615/25. Water and wastewater. Water and sewage. Microbiological assays. Determination of fecal enterococci by the membrane filtration method (FM) and the tube method. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  37. Geldreich EE (1970) Applying bacteriological parameters to recreational water quality. J Am Water Works Assoc 62:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Regulation of the Minister of Environmental Protection. Natural Resources and Forestry of 16 December 1991, Journal of Laws, 115, item 503. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dzyuban AN (2005) The environmental conditions of the Sheksna reservoir: assessment based on microbiological investigations. Water Resour 32(1):62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fries JS, Characklis GW, Noble RT (2008) Sediment-water exchange of Vibrio sp. and fecal indicator bacteria: implications for persistence and transport in the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA. Water Res 42:941–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.09.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Huachang H, Jianwen Q, Liang Y (2010) Environmental factors influencing the distribution of total and fecal coliform bacteria in six water storage reservoirs in the Pearl River Delta region. Chin J Environ Sci 22(5):663–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60160-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Filipkowska Z (2003) Sanitary and bacteriological aspects of sewage treatment. Acta Microbiol Pol 52(Suppl):57–66

    Google Scholar 

  43. Godela A, Lewańska M, Myga-Nowak M (2017) Changes in surface water microflora caused by discharge of purified sewage into rivers. World Scientific News 75:26–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Almeida CA, Quintar S, González P, Mallea MA (2007) Influence of urbanization and tourist activities on the water quality of Potrero de los Funes River (San Luis – Argentina). Environ Monit Assess 133:459–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9600-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Evanson M, Ambrose RF (2006) Sources and growth dynamics of fecal indicator bacteria in a coastal wetland system and potential impacts to adjacent waters. Water Res 40:475–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Garcia-Arminsen T, Servais P (2004) Enumeration of viable E. coli in rivers and wastewaters by fluorescent in situ hybridization. J Microbiol Method 58:269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2004.04.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Olapade OA, Weage EA (2010) Comparison of fecal indicator bacterial populations in surface waters of the Kalamazoo River, USA. Microbes Environ 25(1):41–44. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME09136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gołaś I, Korzekwa K, Harnisz M et al (2009) Influence of fishery management and environmental factors on occurrence of heterotrophic, hemolytic and mesophilic bacteria and Aeromonas hydrophila in waters of Drwęca River, Poland. Arch Environ Prot 35(2):27–40

    Google Scholar 

  49. Korzekwa K, Gołaś I, Harnisz M (2012) Evaluation of anthropogenic pollution in the river water based on genetic diversity of Aeromonas hydrophila. Arch Environ Prot 38(3):41–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Niewolak S, Gołaś I (2000) Estimation of degree pollution and sanitary and bacteriological state of underground and surface waters in Omulewski Aquifer area after liquidation of large cattle and pig farms. Pol J Environ Stud 9(6):487–503

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Niewolak S, Opieka A (2000) Potentially pathogenic microorganisms in water and bottom sediments in the Czarna Hańcza River. Pol J Environ Stud 9(3):183–194

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chandra R, Singh S, Raj A (2006) Seasonal bacteriological analysis of Gola River water contaminated with pulp paper mill waste in Uttaranchal, India. Environ Monit Assess 118:393–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-1508-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Pianetti A, Sabatini L, Bruscolini F et al (2004) Fecal contamination indicators, Salmonella, Vibrio and Aeromonas in water used for the irrigation of agricultural products. Epidemiol Infect 132:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026880300181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pirnay J-P, Matthijs S, Colak H et al (2005) Global Pseudomonas aeruginosa biodiversity as reflected in a Belgian river. Environ Microbiol 7(7):969–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00776.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 8 July 2004 on the requirements for the evacuation of wastewater to water and ground and substances that are particularly harmful to the aquatic environment, Journal of Laws, No. 168, item 1763. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  56. Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 24 July 2006 on the requirements for the evacuation of wastewater to water and ground and substances that are particularly harmful to the aquatic environment, Journal of Laws, No. 137, item 984. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  57. Regulation of the Minister of the Environment off 18 November 2014 on the requirements for the evacuation of wastewater to water and ground and substances that are particularly harmful to the aquatic environment, Journal of Laws, item 1800. [in Polish]

    Google Scholar 

  58. Jóźwiakowski K, Podbrożna D, Kopczacka K et al (2018) The state of water and wastewater management in the municipalities of the Roztocze National Park. J Ecol Eng 19(1):255–262. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/84764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kirschner AKT, Kavka GG, Velimirov B et al (2009) Microbiological water quality along the Danube River: integrating data from two whole-river surveys and a transnational monitoring network. Water Res 43:3673–3684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.05.034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Goel V, Grad IE, Kumar A, Verma NK (2008) Quantitative study on microbial pollution of River Yamuna at Delhi. Inst Eng J 88:56–60

    Google Scholar 

  61. Feachem R (1975) An improved role for faecal coliform to faecal streptococci ratios in the differentiation between human and non-human pollution sources. Water Res 9(7):689–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Geldreich EE (1976) Fecal coliform and fecal streptococcus density relationships in waste discharges and receiving waters. Crit Rev Environ Control 6:349–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Servais P, Garcia-Armisen T, George I, Billen G (2007) Fecal bacteria in the rivers of the Seine drainage network (France): sources, fate and modelling. Sci Total Environ 375(1–3):152–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Tryland I, Surman S, Berg JD (2002) Monitoring faecal contamination of the Thames estuary using semi-automated early warning system. Water Sci Technol 46(3):25–31. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Horman A, Rimhanen-Finne R, Maunula L et al (2004) Campylobacter spp., Giardia spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Noroviruses, and indicator organisms in surface water in southwestern Finland, 2000–2001. Appl Environ Microbol 70:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.1.87-95.2004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Korzeniewska E (2005) Escherichia coli and other groups of opportunistically pathogenic and pathogenic bacteria in the offshore water of the Lake Wigry. Arch Environ Prot 31(2):69–84

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lipp EK, Farrah SA, Rose JB (2001) Assessment and impact of microbial fecal pollution and human enteric pathogens in a coastal community. Mar Pollut Bull 42:286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00152-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Wilkes G, Edge T, Gannon V et al (2009) Seasonal relationships among indicator bacteria, pathogenic bacteria, Cryptosporidium oocysts, Giardia cysts, and hydrological indices for surface waters within an agricultural landscape. Water Res 43:2209–2223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.01.033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Microbiology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland

    Iwona Gołaś, Anna Gotkowska-Płachta & Jacek Arkadiusz Potorski

Authors
  1. Iwona Gołaś
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Gotkowska-Płachta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jacek Arkadiusz Potorski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iwona Gołaś .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland

    Ewa Korzeniewska

  2. The Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland

    Monika Harnisz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gołaś, I., Gotkowska-Płachta, A., Potorski, J.A. (2020). Microorganisms as Sanitary State Bioindicators of Flowing Waters in Poland. In: Korzeniewska, E., Harnisz, M. (eds) Polish River Basins and Lakes – Part II. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 87. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12139-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation