Skip to main content

Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Biodiversity in Freshwaters in Northeastern Poland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Polish River Basins and Lakes – Part II

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 87))

  • 402 Accesses

Abstract

Biodiversity is a significant element that describes the ecological state of waterbodies. Eutrophication is a widespread problem that has an impact on water habitats and leads to the succession of sensitive species. Habitat degradation results in significant, predictable decreases in taxonomic diversity. We assessed benthic macroinvertebrate community structure (mainly families) in 9 rivers, 9 ponds, and 23 lakes in northeastern Poland. Mollusca, Annelida, Arthropoda, and Nemathelminthes were the 4 phyla represented, and 76 Insecta families, 5 taxa of Crustacea, and 12 Mollusca families were identified. A total of 91 taxa (mainly families) were recorded in all of the waterbodies studied. Diptera, Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera, and Gastropoda were the major components of the benthic macroinvertebrate communities in the aquatic habitats studied. The biodiversity values of the macroinvertebrate assemblages in the rivers and lakes studied were similar. This likely resulted from the similar number of habitats in both types of waters. Differences in biodiversity among the various waterbodies could be evidence of the moderate, diversified anthropogenic pressure to which they are subjected. The analysis of similarities indicated that in terms of the benthic macroinvertebrate communities, the waterbodies studied formed three groups, which, with just one exception, consisted separately of rivers, ponds, and lakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davies BR, Biggs J, Williams PJ, Lee JT, Thompson S (2008) A comparison of the catchment sizes of rivers, streams, ponds, ditches and lakes: implications for protecting aquatic biodiversity in an agricultural landscape. Hydrobiologia 597:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamerlík L, Svitok M, Novikmec M, Ocadlik M, Bitušík P (2013) Local, among-site, and regional diversity patterns of benthic macroinvertebrates in high altitude waterbodies: do ponds differ from lakes? Hydrobiologia 723:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Poikane S, Johnson RK, Sandin L, Schartau AK, Solimini AG, Urbanič G, Arbačiauskas KS, Aroviita J, Gabriels W, Miler O, Pusch MT, Tim H, Böhmer J (2016) Benthic macroinvertebrates in lake ecological assessment: a review of methods, intercalibration and practical recommendations. Sci Total Environ 543:123–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ding Y, Shan B, Zhao Y (2015) Assessment of river habitat quality in the Hai River Basin, Northern China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:11699–11717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlisle DM, Hawkins CP, Meador MR, Potapova M, Falcone J (2008) Biological assessments of Appalachian streams based on predictive models for fish, macroinvertebrate, and diatom assemblages. J N Am Benthol Soc 27:16–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaughn CC (2010) Biodiversity losses and ecosystem function in freshwaters: emerging conclusions and research directions. Bioscience 60:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Woodcock TS, Huryn AD (2005) Leaf litter processing and invertebrate assemblages along a pollution gradient in a Maine (USA) headwater stream. Environ Pollut 134:363–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Townsend CR, Hildrew AG (1994) Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshw Biol 31:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones FC (2008) Taxonomic sufficiency: the influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ Rev 16:45–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson DM, Whittaker RJ (2010) Conservation biogeography – foundations, concepts and challenges. Divers Distrib 16:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata ZI, Knowler DJ, Leveque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard AH, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hellawell JM (1986) Biological indicators of freshwater pollution and environmental management. Elsevier Applied Science, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (1993) Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt-Kloiber A, Nijboer RC (2004) The effect of taxonomic resolution on the assessment of ecological water quality classes. Hydrobiologia 516:269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marcinkowski P, Giełczewski M, Okruszko T (2018) Where might the hands-off protection strategy of anastomosing rivers lead? A case study of Narew National Park. Pol J Environ Stud 27:2647–2658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goździejewska A, Skrzypczak A, Furgała-Selezniow G, Koszałka J, Mamcarz A (2010) Zooplankton in the Nida River (the upper Wkra river) subjected to revitalization treatments. Pol J Nat Sci 25:387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kapusta A, Skóra M, Duda A, Morzuch J, Kolman R (2011) Distribution and growth of juvenile Atlantic sturgeon released into Drwęca and Wisłoka rivers (Poland). Arch Pol Fish 19:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parszuto K, Tandyrak R, Grochowska J, Deleżuch U (2017) The validity of reserve protection of the seepage spring areas of Łyna river for tourism development and preservation of the quality of its water. Folia Turistica 44:63–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kondracki J (2001) Geografia regionalna Polski. PWN Warszawa, Wydawn

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kufel I, Kufel L (1997) Eutrophication processes in a shallow, macrophyte-dominated Lake – nutrient loading to and flow through lake Łuknajno (Poland). Hydrobiologia 342/343:387–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Błachuta J, Pasztaleniec A (2011) Study area. In: Soszka H (ed) Ecological status assessment of the waters in the Wel River catchment. Wydawnictwo IRŚ, Olsztyn, p 320

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jeuniaux C (1968) Nutrition and digestion. In: Florkin M, Scheer BT (eds) Chemical zoology. Academic Press, London, p 660

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffmann H, Hipp E, Sedlmeier UA (1987) Aerobic and anaerobic metabolism of the freshwater oligochaete Tubifex sp. Hydrobiologia 155:157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maltby L (1991) Pollution as a probe of life-history adaptation in Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda). Oikos 61:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Piesik Z (1983) Biology of Dreissena polymorpha (Pall) settling on stylon nets and the role of this mollusc in eliminating the seston and the nutrients from the watercourse. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 30:353–361

    Google Scholar 

  27. Piechocki A, Dyduch-Falinowska A (1993) Mięczaki, Małże. Pol Tow Hydrobiol, Fauna słodkowodna Polski, zeszyt 7A, PWN, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vaughn CC, Hakenkamp CC (2001) The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw Biol 46:1431–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liljendahl-Nurminen A, Horppila J, Eloranta P, Malinen T, Uusitalo L (2002) The seasonal dynamics and distribution of Chaoborus flavicans in adjacent lake basins of different morphometry and degree of eutrophication. Freshw Biol 47:1283–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Borkent A (1981) The distribution and habitat preferences of the Chaoboridae (Culicomorpha: Diptera) of the holarctic region. Can J Zool 59:122–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferrington LC (2008) Global diversity of non-biting midges (Chironomidae; Insecta-Diptera) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595:447–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sowa R (1962) Materiały do poznania Ephemeroptera i Plecoptera w Polsce. Acta Hydrobiol 4:205–224

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bauernfeind E, Soldán T (2012) The mayflies of Europe (Ephemeroptera). Apollo Books, Ollerup

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Soszka H (2011) Ocena stanu ekologicznego wód zlewni rzeki Wel. Wytyczne do zintegrowanej oceny stanu ekologicznego rzek i jezior na potrzeby planów gospodarowania wodami w dorzeczu. Wydawnictwo IRS, Olsztyn

    Google Scholar 

  35. Clausnitzer V, Kalkman VJ, Ram M, Collen B, Baillie JEM, Bedjaniç M, Darwall WRT, Dijkstra K-DB, Dow R, Hawking J, Karube H, Malikova E, Paulson D, Schütte K, Suhling F, Villanueva R, von Ellenrieder N, Wilson K (2009) Odonata enter the biodiversity crisis debate: the first global assessment of an insect group. Biol Conserv 142:1864–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bernard R, Buczyński P, Tończyk G, Wendzonka J (2009) Atlas rozmieszczenia ważek (Odonata) w Polsce. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań

    Google Scholar 

  37. Butler R, de Maynadier P (2008) The significance of aquatic and shoreline habitat integrity to the conservation of lacustrine damselflies (Odonata). J Insect Conserv 12:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Müller Z, Jakab T, Toth A, Devai G, Szallassy N, Kiss B, Horvath R (2003) Effect of sports fisherman activities on dragonfly assemblages on a Hungarian river floodplain. Biodivers Conserv 12:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mackay RJ, Wiggins GB (1979) Ecological diversity in Trichoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 24:185–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wiberg-Larsen P, Brodersen KP, Birkholm S, Grøn PN, Skriver J (2000) Species richness and assemblage structure of Trichoptera in Danish streams. Freshw Biol 43:633–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. de Moor FC, Ivanov VD (2008) Global diversity of caddisflies (Trichoptera: Insecta) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595:393–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek Koszałka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koszałka, J., Jabłońska-Barna, I. (2020). Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Biodiversity in Freshwaters in Northeastern Poland. In: Korzeniewska, E., Harnisz, M. (eds) Polish River Basins and Lakes – Part II. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 87. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12139-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics