Abstract
Despite recent advances in computational science, the adoption of computationally intensive, high-fidelity simulation models remains a challenge for many structural dynamics applications, especially those within the domain of uncertainty quantification (UQ), requiring repeated calls to a computationally intensive simulator. Reduced order and surrogate models offer an attractive alternative to circumvent this challenge. This contribution investigates how these modeling principles can be leveraged for different UQ applications. For both types of approximate models, the development of the corresponding (reduced order or surrogate) model is directly informed through simulations of the high-fidelity numerical model. The tuning of the approximate model aims to improve accuracy for the specific UQ task at hand, rather than targeting a globally accurate approximation. The specific applications discussed correspond to seismic loss estimation (for reduced order modeling) and posterior sampling for Bayesian inference (for surrogate modeling).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gidaris, I., Taflanidis, A.A.: Parsimonious modeling of hysteretic structural response in earthquake engineering: calibration/validation and implementation in probabilistic risk assessment. Eng. Struct. 49, 1017–1033 (2013)
Jensen, H.A., Muñoz, A., Papadimitriou, C., Millas, E.: Model-reduction techniques for reliability-based design problems of complex structural systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 149, 204–217 (2016)
Tehrani, M., Harvey Jr., P., Gavin, H., Mirza, A.: Inelastic condensed dynamic models for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Eng. Struct. 177, 616–629 (2018)
Gidaris, I., Taflanidis, A.A., Mavroeidis, G.P.: Kriging metamodeling in seismic risk assessment based on stochastic ground motion models. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 44(14), 2377–2399 (2015)
Mai, C.V., Spiridonakos, M.D., Chatzi, E.N., Sudret, B.: Surrogate modeling for stochastic dynamical systems by combining nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous input models and polynomial chaos expansions. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 6, 4 (2016)
Bakalis, K., Vamvatsikos, D., Fragiadakis, M.: Seismic risk assessment of liquid storage tanks via a nonlinear surrogate model. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 46(15), 2851–2868 (2017)
Jensen, H., Millas, E., Kusanovic, D., Papadimitriou, C.: Model-reduction techniques for Bayesian finite element model updating using dynamic response data. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 279, 301–324 (2014)
Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J., Wynn, H.P.: Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat. Sci. 4(4), 409–435 (1989)
Angelikopoulos, P., Papadimitriou, C., Koumoutsakos, P.: X-TMCMC: adaptive kriging for Bayesian inverse modeling. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 289, 409–428 (2015)
Zhang, J., Taflanidis, A.A.: Adaptive Kriging stochastic sampling and density approximation and its application to rare-event estimation. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. A Civil Eng. 4(3), 04018021 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Taflanidis, A.A., Zhang, J., Patsialis, D. (2020). Applications of Reduced Order and Surrogate Modeling in Structural Dynamics. In: Barthorpe, R. (eds) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12075-7_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12075-7_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12074-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12075-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)