Secured Remote Control of Greenhouse Based on Wireless Sensor Network and Multi Agent Systems

  • Kamal Moummadi
  • Rachida AbidarEmail author
  • Hicham MedromiEmail author
  • Ahmed ZianiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 912)


QueryAgent-oriented formalisms are now increasingly used in artificial intelligence. Their success is partly due to their easy adaptation to the needs of distributed real-time applications. This paper explains the design and implementation of a novel platform called Secured Remote Control of Greenhouse (SRCG) for the remote control of the inside and outside climatic and also soil parameters that influence the production in greenhouses such as temperature, humidity, CO2 and soil moisture…. A Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) provides pertinent information that is used to supervise ventilation, heating and pump…. The use of SRCG avoids the needed to perform the monitoring actions on site. The platform described in this paper is simple to be installed and used by farmers who do not have knowledge in computer skills. Thus, all farmers can control their greenhouses from a distance device in an easy and an ubiquitous manner. They can control actuators to adjust these parameters (fan, heater, drip irrigation…). The architecture of the platform is based on Multi agent systems (MAS) and a Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problem (DCSP). MAS gather, integrate, and deliver the collected climate’s parameter information from distributed sensors, and synchronize this information with a remote supervisor computer. Proposed SRCG has advantage that can handle situations in the far away area from the farms through PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) and mobile device, which shortens time, expense and supports agricultural decision-making. The prototype is built in Java employing general interfaces of both MAS and constraint programming (CP) platforms, using JADE and CHOCO libraries.


Greenhouse Decision-making Wireless sensor network Multi agent systems Control Monitoring JADE CHOCO 


  1. 1.
    Yick, J., Mukherjee, B., Ghosal, D.: Wireless sensor network survey. Comput. Netw. 52(12), 2292–2330 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blackmore, S.: Precision farming: an introduction. Outlook Agric. 23(4), 275–280 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aqeel-ur-Rehman, Abbasi, A., Islam, N., Shaikh, Z.: A review of wireless sensors and networks’ applications in agriculture. Elsevier, April 2011Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wooldridge, M.: Agent-based software engineering. IEEE Proc. Softw. Eng. 144(1), 26–37 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Durfee, E.H., Montgomery, T.A., MICE: a flexible testbed for intelligent coordination experiments. In: Proceedings of 9th International AAAI Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 25–40 (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moummadi, K., Abidar, R., Medromi, H., Moutaouakkil, F.: Network alert management based on multi agent systems for surveillance and supervising software and hardware components. IRECOS 9(6) (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wallace, M.: Practical applications of constraint programming. Constraints J. 1, 139–168 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moummadi, K., Abidar, R., Medromi, H.: A real time platform to supervise and control climate’s parameters and manage drip fertigation in greenhoses based on multi-agents system. In: 4th International Conference – SIIE 2011, Marrakech 17–19 February (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yokoo, M., Ishida, T., Durfee, H., Kuwabara, K.: Distributed constraint satisfaction for formalizing distributed problem solving. In: 12th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 614–621, June 1992Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moummadi, K., Abidar, R., Medromi, H., Mobile device and multi agent systems: an implemented platform of real time data communication and synchronization. In: International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS 2011) (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Havens, S.: NoGood caching for MultiAgent backtrack search. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, June 1997.
  12. 12.
    Yokoo, M., Ishida, T., Durfee, H., Kuwabara, K.: The distributed constraint satisfaction problem: formalization and algorithms. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 10(5), 633–685 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, N., Zhang, N., Wang, M.: Wireless sensors in agriculture and food industry-resent development and future perspective. Comput. Electron. Agric. 15, 1–14 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moummadi, K., Abidar, R., Medromi, H., SBAA: Conception et réalisation d’une plateforme de communication et de synchronisation temps réel à base des systèmes multi agents entre les terminaux mobiles sous ANDROID et un serveur central, 2èmes Journées Doctorales en Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication, JDTIC’10, Fès-Morocco, 15–17 Juillet 2010Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abidar, R., Moummadi, K., Medromi, H.: Multi-Agent System for work orders management based on android operating system. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT) 4(1), January 2015 ISSN: 2278-0181 IJERTV4IS010620
  16. 16.
    Abidar, R., Moummadi, K., Medromi, H.: Intelligent and pervasive supervising platform for information system security based on multi-agent systems. IRECOS 10(1) (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poslad, S., et al.: CRUMPET: creation of user-friendly mobile services personalised for tourism. In: Second International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies, London, UK, March 2001Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    JADE Homepage.
  19. 19.
    Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA), The FIPA 2000 Specifications.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Shankar, T., Shanmugavel, S., Karthikeyan, A.: Modified harmony search algorithm for energy optimization in WSN. Int. J. Commun. Antenna Propag. 3(4), 214–220 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shankar, T., Shanmugavel, S., Karthikeyan, A.: Hybrid approach for energy optimization in wireless sensor networks using PSO. Int. J. Commun. Antenna Propag. (IRECAP) 3(4), 221–226 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Telagarapu, P., Govinda Rao, L., Srinivasa Rao, D., Devi Pradeep, P.: Analysis of mobile user identification inside the buildings. Int. J. Commun. Antenna Propag. (IRECAP) 1(2), 196–203 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hassan II University, ENSEMOasis, CasablancaMorocco

Personalised recommendations