Skip to main content

“Creating Orientation and Direction”—The Strategic Metasystem (Part 2)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Viability of Organizations Vol. 1
  • 469 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter continues the description of system 4 but focuses on its internal processes such as creating focus, balancing out with system 3, and creating one of the catalysts for the organization’s identity formation process. Here, we will encounter the problem that although innovations are welcome by an organization in principle, at the same time, they can significantly challenge its self-understanding and are thus often resented. Although being a vital function for the strategic adaptation process of an organization, system 4 nevertheless faces three major organizational challenges. This chapter will describe how system 4 can counteract to these challenges and why the design of a robust balancing mechanism between systems 3 and 4 is of paramount importance to the vitality and viability of an organization. Stafford Beer envisaged for this equilibrium the concept of an “operations room”; what this concept entails will be outlined at the end of chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All figures in this chapter related to the VSM are or contain if not stated otherwise adapted detail views from (Beer 1995a: 136, Fig. 37). For the corresponding permission details, see the reference section at the end of this chapter.

  2. 2.

    One should not be misled by the static term “Self”, which insinuates continuity and immutability. However, if one follows how organizations define themselves over the course of time, one notices how much their Self changes in response to environmental changes (Schwaninger 2006: 151).

  3. 3.

    In modern organizational theory, we find the same question asked from 1991 onward in the research on the “ambidexterity” of organizations. Ambidexterity concerns the relation between the optimization of the existing business (“exploitation”) and the invention/creation of the new business (“exploration”), so between systems 3 and 4 (for this see March 1991; Stadler, Rajwani, and Karaba 2014; Turner, Swart, and Maylor 2013).

  4. 4.

    In this book, I will not describe the syntegration process, since it has already been sufficiently described in other books such as Beer (1994a), Malik (2011), Pérez Ríos (2012), and Schwaninger (2006) and would go beyond the scope of this book.

References

  • Beer, S. (1994). Beyond dispute: The invention of team syntegrity. Chichester, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1995a). Diagnosing the system for organizations. Chichester [West Sussex], New York: Wiley. (Figures 7, 35, 36 and 37 republished with permission of John Wiley and Sons Inc. and the permission conveyed through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1995b). Brain of the firm (2nd ed.). Chichester, England, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1995c). The heart of enterprise. Chichester [England], New York: Wiley. (Figures 21 and 51 republished with permission of John Wiley and Sons Inc. and the permission conveyed through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bort, J. (2016). A rare tour of Google’s ‘The Garage’ lab where employees can build anything. Business Insider. June 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1992). New society of organizations. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoverstadt, P. (2008). The fractal organization: Creating sustainable organizations with the Viable System Model. Chichester, U.K., Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, F. (2008). Strategie des Managements komplexer Systeme: Ein Beitrag zur Management-Kybernetik evolutionärer Systeme (10th ed.). Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, F. (2011). Strategie: Navigieren in der Komplexität der Neuen Welt. Frankfurt a.M: Campus Verl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Ríos, J. (2012). Design and diagnosis for sustainable organizations: The viable system method. Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, T. (2014). Yeah, lasst es uns versuchen. Der Spiegel. December 15: 68–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M. (2006). Intelligent organizations: Powerful models for systemic management; with 6 tables. Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, C., Rajwani, T., & Karaba, F. (2014). Solutions to the exploration/exploitation dilemma: Networks as a new level of analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(2), 172–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Lassl .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lassl, W. (2019). “Creating Orientation and Direction”—The Strategic Metasystem (Part 2). In: The Viability of Organizations Vol. 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12014-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics