E-Government and the Quality of Information in Web Portals of the GADM of Ecuador

  • Patricia Henríquez-CoronelEmail author
  • Jennifer Bravo-Loor
  • Enrique Díaz-Barrera
  • Yosselin Vélez-Romero
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 918)


This paper shows the results of a research that evaluated the quality of the information provided by the Ecuadorian local government in their web portals. The research fits a quantitative approach; and it has a descriptive scope. A sample of 121 web portals was analyzed through a rubric designed by researchers and evaluated by experts. The rubric evaluated the quality and periodicity of the information through seventeen indicators. The leading results indicate that the published information complies with the Organic Law of Transparency and Access to Public Information, and the periodicity with which the information is updated is relatively good. Options such as the translation of the page appear in a few municipal portals of the country. The municipal Ecuadorian e-government is in an improved stage, which is characterized by UNESCO as the publication of elementary information to improve communication between the government and citizens.


Quality of the information Local government E-government Ecuador 


  1. 1.
    Naser, A., Concha, G.: The e-government in public administration. United Nations Publication (Spanish) (2011).
  2. 2.
    Torres, M., Viloria, A., Vasquez, C.: Management and information quality in e-government. Univ. Sci. Technol. 14(54), 55–64 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andrade, J., Yedra, Y.: Transparent systems for efficient electronic governments (Spanish). Enl@ce: Venezuelan J. Inf. Technol. Knowl. 4(2), 81–95 (2007).
  4. 4.
    Act No. 0: Organic Code of Territorial Organization, Autonomy and Decentralization (Spanish). Asamblea Nacional, Quito (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Act No. 24: Organic Law of Transparency and access to Public Information (Spanish). Asamblea Nacional, Quito (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hernandez, R., Fernandez, C., Baptista, P.: Investigation Methodology. McGraw-Hill Education, Mexico City (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cerezo, J.M.: The challenges of the administration in Spain (Spanish). Paper presented at the II Jornada Democracia digital, eAdministración y participación ciudadana. Barcelona, España, marzo (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Institute of Statistics and Census: Ecuador Statistical National Institute of Statistics and Census.
  9. 9.
    National Secretariat of the Public Administration: Electoral Plan 2014–2017 Version 1.0. National Secretary of Public Administration (Spanish) (2014).
  10. 10.
    Esteves, J.: Analysis of the development of municipal e-government in Spain. IE Working Paper, Madrid (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Act No. 0: Act of Citizen Participation (Spanish). Asamblea Nacional, Quito (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Naser, A.: Electronic Government, Indicators. Latin American and Caribbean Institute for Economic and Social Planning (ILPES) (Spanish) (2009).
  13. 13.
    Líppez-De, C.S., Garcia, A.R.: Citizens and e-government: citizen orientation of municipal web sites in Colombia to promote participation. Univ. Human. 82(82), 279–304 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bersano, L.: E-Government best practices in Latin America. What indicators are used to describe them? What is its relevance to measure the level reached on the way to the E-society? University of Buenos Aires, Argentina (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zamora, C., Arrobo, N., Cornejo, G.: The Electronic Government in Ecuador: innovation in public administration (Spanish) (2018).
  16. 16.
    United Nations Organization: United Nations Study on Electronic Government, 2012 (Spanish) (2013).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Laica Eloy AlfaroMantaEcuador

Personalised recommendations