PSP-CI: A Tool for Collecting Developer’s Data with Continuous Integration

  • Brian PandoEmail author
  • Tony Ojeda
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 918)


Personal Software Process (PSP) is a method focused on the production of software from an individual perspective of quality. Its benefits in the improvement of the personal process are demonstrated by different researches. However, demanded documentation has stopped its implementations both in academy and industry, even though there are semi-automatic tools that try to solve the problem. This research work presents a tool based on Continuous Integration (CI), allowing to automate part of the PSP process. A preliminary experiment is carried out to validate the contribution in the software process, obtaining favorable results with almost no effort for the developer.


Personal Software Process Tool Continuous Integration 


  1. 1.
    Pomeroy-Huff, M., Cannon, R., Chick, T.A., Mullaney, J.L., Nichols, W.R.: The Personal Software Process (PSP) Body of Knowledge, Version 2.0, Massachuset (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Callison, R., MacDonald, M.: A Bibliography of the Personal Software Process (PSP) and the Team Software Process (TSP). Software Engineering Institute (2009). Accessed 11 Aug 2018
  3. 3.
    Marcos, A., Santos, A.B., Valêncio, C.R., Dos, V., Borges, A.: PSP support component integrated into a web project management environment (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nasir, N.M., Fauzi, S.S.M.: Implementation of the Personal Software Process in Academic Settings and Current Support Tools. IGI Global (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paulk, M.C.: Factors Affecting Personal Software Quality (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Angarita, L.B., Tovar, J.P.L.: Evaluation of design and code revisions in academic practices of software engineering. In: 2017 6th International Conference on Software Process Improvement (CIMPS), pp. 1–8 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gasca-Hurtado, G.P., Alvarez, M.C.G., Manrique-Losada, B., Arias, D.M.: Diagnostic on teaching-learning of software desing by using the personal software process framework. In: 2015 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1–7 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Disney, A.M., Johnson, P.M.: Investigating data quality problems in the PSP. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering - SIGSOFT 1998/FSE-6, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 143–152 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hairul, M., Nasir, N.M., Yusof, A.M.: Automating a modified personal software process. Malaysian J. Comput. Sci. 18(2), 11–27 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Syu, I., Salimi, A., Towbidnejad, M., Hilburn, T.: A web-based system for automating a disciplined personal software process (PSP). In: Proceedings Tenth Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, pp. 86–96 (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joonbakhsh, A., Sami, A.: Mining and extraction of personal software process measures through IDE interaction logs. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories - MSR 2018, pp. 78–81 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pando, B., Rodríguez, G.: PSP: how well it matches the skill set sought by the software industry in Latin America? A proposal to incorporate PSP into undergraduate SE education. In: Proceedings of Jornadas Iberoamericanas de Ingeniería de Software e Ingeniería del Conocimiento 2018 (JIISIC 2018) (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salinas, E., Cerpa, N., Rojas, P.: A service oriented architecture for the implementation of the personal software process. Rev. Chil. Ing. 19(1), 40–52 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mansoor, S., Bhutto, A., Bhatti, N., aamir Patoli, N., Ahmed, M.: Improvement of students abilities for quality of software through personal software process. In: 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Electrical Engineering and Computational Technologies (ICIEECT), pp. 1–4 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gomez-Alvarez, M.C., Gasca-Hurtado, G.P., Manrique-Losada, B., Arias, D.M.: Method of pedagogic instruments design for software engineering. In: 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stark, J.A., Crocker, R.: Trends in software process: the PSP and agile methods. IEEE Softw. 20(3), 89–91 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Unluturk, M.S., Kurtel, K.: Quantifying productivity of individual software programmers: practical approach. Comput. Inform. 34(4), 959–972 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barrera, J.A.H.: Integrating software development frameworks: Scrum, PSP and ISO25000. Vent. Informática 32, 151–164 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bernabé, R.B., Navia, I.Á., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Faat: freelance as a team. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality - TEEM 2015, pp. 687–694 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pagotto, T., Fabri, J.A., Lerario, A., Goncalves, J.A.: Scrum solo: software process for individual development. In: 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K.-J.: Continuous software engineering: a roadmap and agenda. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 176–189 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Humphrey, W.S.: The personal process in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Software Process. Applying the Software Process, pp. 69–77 (1994)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iqbal, N., ul Hassan, M., Rehman Osman, A., Ahmad, M.: A framework for partial implementation of PSP in extreme programming. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 3(2), 604–607 (2013). Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mihaylov, I., Ivanov, P., Stefanova, E., Eskenazi, A., Ilieva, S.: The expert approach: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies e-Learning - CompSysTech 2003, pp. 101–106 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ibrahim, A., Choi, H.-J.: A framework for analyzing activity time data. In: 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering, pp. 14–18 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Raza, M., Faria, J.P., Salazar, R.: Helping software engineering students analyzing their performance data: tool support in an educational environment. In: 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE-C), pp. 241–243 (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duarte, C.B., Faria, J.P., Raza, M.: Process PAIR: automated personal software process performance analysis and improvement recommendation. In: 2012 Eighth International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 131–136 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chaiyo, Y., Ramingwong, S.: The development of a design tool for personal software process (PSP). In: 2013 10th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology, pp. 1–4 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Corley, C.S., Lois, F., Quezada, S.: Web usage patterns of developers. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), pp. 381–390 (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gartner: Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2018). Accessed 08 Aug 2018
  31. 31.
    Swamidurai, R., Umphress, D.: Engaging students through practitioner centered software engineering. In: SoutheastCon 2015, pp. 1–5 (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jirapanthong, W.: Personal software process with automatic requirements traceability to support startups. J. Rev. Glob. Econ. 6, 367–374 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Nacional Agraria de la SelvaTingo MaríaPerú

Personalised recommendations