Abstract
In this paper we have realized a comparative study of mammograms classification accuracy based on a new Gentle Adaboost algorithm for different wavelet transforms and different features. Our proposition deals with the combination of a new Gentle Adaboost based algorithm with three wavelets transforms. In this new algorithm, the main classifier is realized by weighted weak classifiers. These weak classifiers are constructed from the sub-bands of discrete wavelet transform, stationary wavelet transform and double density wavelet transform. Used features are extracted from transformed mammograms. We have investigated the effect of these wavelet transforms combined with the extracted features on the classification accuracy. Receiver Operating Curves (ROC) tool is employed to evaluate the performance of the propositions. Mammograms of MIAS Database are used as samples to classify. True positive rate is plotted versus false positive rate for different types of features and for Gentle Adaboost iterations. Results showed that the best area under curve (AUC), is reached for Zernike moments combined with double density wavelet transform and it is equal to 1 for both t = 10 and t = 50.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Freund, Y.: Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority. Inf. Comput. 121(2), 256–285 (1995)
Meir, R., Ratsch, G.: An introduction to boosting and leveraging. In: Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 118–183 (2003)
Schapire, R.E.: The strength of weak learnability. Mach. Learn. 5(2), 197–227 (1990)
Schapire, R.E.: The boosting approach to machine learning: an overview. In: Proceedings of the MSRI Workshop on Nonlinear Estimation and Classification (2002)
Schapire, R.E., Singer, Y.: Improved boosting algorithms using confidence-rated predictions. Mach. Learn. 37(3), 297–336 (1999)
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.: Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining and Inference and Prediction. Springer, New York (2001)
Nanni, L., Lumini, A.: Wavelet selection for disease classification by DNA microarray data. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(1), 990–995 (2011)
Freund, Y.: An adaptive version of the boost by majority algorithm. Mach. Learn. 43(3), 293–318 (2001)
Vezhnevets, A.: Modest AdaBoost – teaching AdaBoost to generalize better. In: Paper presented at the Graphicon, Novosibirsk Akademgorodok, Russia, pp. 322–325 (2005)
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. Annal. Stat. 28, 337–374 (2000)
Culp, M., Johnson, K., Michailidis, F.: ada: an R Package for Stochastic Boosting (2007)
Kanade, T., Jain, A., Ratha, N.K.: Audio-and video-based biometric person authentification. In: 5th International Conference, AVBPA 2005, Hilton Rye Town, NY, USA, 20–22 July (2005)
Lesecq, S., Gentil, S., Fagarasan, I.: Fault isolation based on wavelet transform. J. Control Eng. Appl. Inform. CEAI 9(3;4), 51–58 (2007)
Cioaca, T., Dumitrescu, B., Stupariu, M.-S.: Lazy wavelet simplication using scale-dependent dense geometric variability descriptors. J. Control Eng. Appl. Inform. CEAI 19(1), 15–26 (2017)
Hamdi, N., Auhmani, K., Hassani, M.M., Elkharki, O.: An efficient gentle adaboost-based approach for mammograms classification. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 81(1) (2015)
Zhang, B.L., Zhang, H., Je, S.S.: Face recognition by applying subband representation and kernel associative memory. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 15, 166–177 (2004)
Nason, G.P., Silverman, B.W.: The stationary wavelet transform and some statistical applications in Wavelets and Statistics. In: Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer, New York (1995)
Arivazhagan, S., Ganesan, L., Savithri, C.N.: Effective multi-resolution transform identification for characterization and classification of texture groups. ICTACT J. Image Video Processing, 02(02) (2011)
Gopi, V.P., Babu, V.S., Dilna, C.: Image resolution enhancement using undecimated double density wavelet transform. Signal Process. Int. J. (SPIJ) 8(5), 67 (2014)
Tamura, H., Mori, S., Yamawaki, T.: Texture features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC 8(6), 460–473 (1978)
Howarth, P., Rüger, S.: Evaluation of texture features for content-based image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR 2004), LNCS, vol. 3115, pp. 326–334, Dublin, Ireland (2004)
Deans, S.R.: Hough transform from the radon transform. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI 3(2), 185–188 (1981)
Murphy, L.M.: Linear feature detection and enhancement in noisy images via the Radon transform. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 4, 279–284 (1986)
Suckling, J., et al.: The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. In: Exerpta Medica International Congress Series, vol. 1069, pp. 375–378 (1994). http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/info/mias.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hamdi, N., Auhmani, K., Hassani, M.M., Elkharki, O. (2019). A New Method Based-Gentle Adaboost and Wavelet Transform for Breast Cancer Classification. In: Ezziyyani, M. (eds) Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2018). AI2SD 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 914. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11884-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11884-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11883-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11884-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)