Abstract
The contribution presents the concept of the property in terms of philosophy, law, economics, sociology, politics, and economic psychology. A concept of “hexagon of property” has been developed taking into account all aspects of this complex category. The contribution considers the process when a person acquires a property object and its development taking into account various aspects of the property: philosophical; cognitive, legal, emotional, strong-willed, profitable, political (domineering) and social aspects. The life cycle of the property object is considered from the standpoint of economics, law, sociology, psychology, and politics. The emphasis is on the ownership from the perspective of economic psychology: components of ownership (cognitive, emotional and volitional) and their formation at different stages of the property development, as well as specific subject-object relations related to the notion of “commodity fetishism” are shown. With the help of statistical data, it is justified that property objects are the extension of personality, especially for intellectual property objects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Demsetz, H.: Toward a theory of property rights II: the competition between private and collective ownership. J. Legal Stud. 31, 653–656 (2002)
Demsetz, H.: In: Anderson, T.L., McChesney, F.S. (eds.) Ownership and the Externality Problem, pp. 282–300. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2003)
Demsetz, H.: Frischmann’s view of “toward a theory of property right”. Rev. Law Econ. 4(1), 127–132 (2008)
Driffield, N., Mickiewicz, T., Temouri, Y.: Ownership control of foreign affiliates: a property rights theory perspective. J. World Bus. 51(6), 965–976 (2016)
Federal State Intellectual Property Service. Annual reports. Federal State Intellectual Property Service, Moscow (2016). https://www.rupto.ru/ru/about/reports. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
Federal State Statistics Service. Science, innovation and information society. Federal State Statistics Service, Moscow (2016). http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/science_and_innovations/science/#. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
Hall, S.G., Ahmad, M.: Can trust explain social capital effect on property rights and growth? Proc. Econ. Financ. 7, 55–64 (2013)
Ilie, L.: Intellectual property rights: an economic approach. Proc. Econ. Financ. 16, 548–562 (2014)
Karnyshev, A.D.: Property as a basic category of economic psychology (2002). http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2011/01/19/1214869266/2002.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
Kelli, A., Värv, A., Mets, T., Mantrov, V., Birštonas, R., Ginter, C.: Different regulatory models of transfer of industrial property rights in the baltic states: a plea for harmonized approach. Int. Comp. Jurisprud. 2(1), 8–17 (2016)
Lundberg, F.: The Rich and Super-Rich. The True Rulers of the United States of America. Progress, Moscow (1971)
Mangialardo, A., Micelli, E.: Social capital and public policies for commons: bottom up processes in public real estate property. Valorization. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 223, 175–180 (2016)
Marx, K.: The Capital, vol. 1 (1867). http://www.esperanto.mv.ru/Marksismo/Kapital1/index.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
Mingaleva, Z., Mirskikh, I.: Psychological aspects of Intellectual property protection. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 190, 220–226 (2015)
Müller, D., Schmitz, P.W.: Transaction costs and the property rights approach to the theory of the firm. Eur. Econ. Rev. 87, 92–107 (2016)
Palahniuk, C.M.: Fight Club. AST, Moscow (2014)
Raghavan, M., Jain, K., Jha, S.K.: Technology and intellectual property strategy of a firm: a view through the commons theory lens. IIMB Manag. Rev. 25(4), 213–227 (2013)
Rakotonarivo, O.S., Jacobsen, J.B., Poudyal, M., Rasoamanana, A., Hockley, N.: Estimating welfare impacts where property rights are contested: methodological and policy implications. Land Use Policy. 70, 71–83 (2018)
Raisberg, B.A., Lozovsky, L.S., Starodubtseva, E.B.: Modern economic dictionary. NFRA-M, Moscow (2007)
Sikor, T., He, J., Lestrelin, G.: Property rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis revisited. World Dev. 93, 337–349 (2017)
Sukarmijan, S.-S., Sapong, O.: The importance of intellectual property for SMEs; challenges and moving forward. UMK Proc. 1, 74–81 (2014)
Tarando, E.E.: Theory of ownership in economic sociology. Soc. Environ. Dev. 4, 69–73 (2012)
Tarando, E.E.: Sociology of property: from K. Marx’s ideas to the St. Petersburg school of economic sociology. Sociology 11(1), 20–31 (2018)
Acknowledgements
The contribution is dedicated to the memory of the scientific adviser, Doctor of Economics, Professor of Samara State University of Economics Aleksey Ivanovich Minin. The authors of the contribution express their gratitude to the management of Samara State University of Economics and personally to the rector of the university, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor G. R. Khasaev.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Domnina, S.V., Salynina, S.U. (2019). “Hexagon” of Property. In: Ashmarina, S., Vochozka, M. (eds) Sustainable Growth and Development of Economic Systems. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11754-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11754-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11753-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11754-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)