Skip to main content

New Methods for Investigating New Dangers

On the Radical Practice of Listening

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Climate Psychology

Part of the book series: Studies in the Psychosocial ((STIP))

Abstract

This chapter argues for the need to take a hard look at our current methodologies, and what it would look like to adopt more innovative approaches to understanding the psycho-social dimensions of climate, energy, and environmental threats. At a time when increasing attention is directed toward understanding people’s motivations, perceptions, and attitudes when it comes to climate change, it behooves us to think very carefully about our research methods. What assumptions are they based on, when it comes to the interplay of subjective and social influences? Are they up to the task? What might we be overlooking? Drawing on a project interviewing conservative Republicans in the States about climate, this chapter argues that paying attention to the “Three A’s”—Anxiety, Ambivalence, and Aspiration—can amplify our investigations, and ideally supplant a reductive tendency to focus on values alone as a key driver of behavior change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcorn, M. (2013). Resistance to learning: Overcoming the desire not to know in classroom teaching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G., Jackson, D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1963). A note on the double bind. Family Process, 2, 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., et al. (2002). Do lonely days invade the nights? Potential social modulation of sleep efficiency. Psychological Science, 13, 384–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D. (2004). The psychoanalytic research interview: Preliminary suggestions. The Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52, 209–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiehl, J. (2016). Facing climate change: An integrated path to the future. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lertzman, R. (2012). Researching psychic dimensions of ecological degradation: Notes from the field. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 17(1), 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lertzman, R. (2015). Environmental melancholia: Psychoanalytic dimensions of engagement. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S. (1999). Phantoms in the brain: Probing the mysteries of the human mind. New York: Harper Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, R. (2009). Loss and climate change: The cost of parallel narratives. Ecopsychology, 3(1), 118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, N. (2018, August 1). Losing earth: The decade we almost stopped climate change. New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/01/magazine/climate-change-losing-earth.html.

  • Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1273–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoknes, P. E. (2015). What we think about when we try not to think about climate change. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing up girl: Psycho-social explorations of gender and class. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace-Wells, D. (2017, July). The uninhabitable earth. New York Magazine. http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/07/climate-change-earth-too-hot-for-humans.html.

  • Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renee Lertzman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lertzman, R. (2019). New Methods for Investigating New Dangers. In: Hoggett, P. (eds) Climate Psychology. Studies in the Psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11741-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics