Skip to main content

Groundwater

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Water Resources of Turkey

Part of the book series: World Water Resources ((WWR,volume 2))

Abstract

About 18% of the total water resources potential of Turkey is made up of groundwater resources. Significant portion of the streamflow of major rivers is supplied by groundwater through springs and baseflow. In 1960s and early 1970s, the financial capacity of Turkey did not allow construction of large dams for irrigation. Development of groundwater resources in alluvial plain aquifers where the agriculture was concentrated has been a priority. In 1990s, the building of large dams has been boosted and irrigation by surface waters preferred due to the lower operational cost. From 1990s, not enough funds have been allocated to explore and develop groundwater resources. In spite of its strategic significance, much more has been invested to investigate and develop the “visible” resource. This unbalanced policy of water resources management has reflected also in the organizational and institutional structure of Turkey. Groundwater resources of Turkey mainly occur in alluvial and karstic aquifers. Large coastal plains and deltas, grabens and pull-apart basins constitute the major alluvial aquifers. The thick and extensive carbonate rocks along the Taurus mountain belt favor formation of productive karst aquifers. The fractured rock aquifers are either low yield or of local importance. Igneous rocks have no permeability and they have very limited outcrops. Groundwater occurs in younger volcanic rocks with limited extension. However, volcanic rock aquifers at foothills of volcanoes, such as Erciyes and Nemrut, may supply a great amount of groundwater where they are recharged by snowmelt. Metamorphic rocks are hydrogeological barriers, in general. They may bear very little amounts of groundwater that might support aquatic ecosystems. Turkey has faced some water mismanagement problems whose consequences are observable in terms of the decline of groundwater levels, reduced spring and streamflows, desiccation of lakes and wetlands and loss of ecosystems. These consequences resulting mainly from managing surface waters and groundwater resources separately, ignoring that they are interacting subsystems of the same and single source, are becoming more frequent and severe. Implementation of the EU-Water Framework Directive has helped, to a certain extent, to maintain the “good status” and to “recover” the degraded water resources and the ecosystems. The “safe yield” approach that has been used in groundwater management needs to be changed to a “sustainable yield” approach which considers also the ecological water needs. This can only be achieved by competent persons who are educated in hydrogeological characterization, conceptualization and modelling of groundwater systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayten N (2014) Principles of sectoral water allocation. Expertise thesis. General Directorate of Water Management, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakalowicz M (2005) Karst groundwater: A challenge for new resources. Hydrogeol J 13:148–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bener M (1965) Karst in Goksu Valley and Taseli Plateau. Istanbul University, Faculty of Literature. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Canik B, Corekcioglu I (1985) The formation of sinkholes (Obruk) between Karapinar and Kizoren-Konya. In: Gunay G, Jhonson AI (eds), Karst water resources, IAHS Publ. No.161, pp 193–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecen AA, Dogruel AS, Dogruel F (2012) Economic growth and structural change in Turkey in 1960–1988. Int J Middle East Stud 26(1):37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degirmenci M, Ekmekci M, Tezcan L, Atmaca E, Namkhai O, Yazici M, Sozudogru O, Aykar E, Akpinar H (2011) Hydrogeological characteristics, contamination risks and protection zones of the Kayseri City Aquifer TUBITAK-CAYDAG Project No 107Y170, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • DSI (1970a) 1/500000 Scale Hydrogeological map sheets of Turkey. Publication of General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • DSI (1970b) Hydrogeological investigation of Nigde-Misli plain. General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works Report, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • DSI (2001) Evaluation report on irrigation schemes operated or transferred by DSI. General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • DSI (2009) Turkey water report. Publication of General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • DSI (2017a) Official bulletin of charted statistics http://www.dsi.gov.tr/yayinlarimiz/haritali-istatistik-bultenleri. Accessed 29 Aug 2018

  • DSI (2017b) Report of hydrology working group, 2nd. Forestry and Water Council, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • DSI (2018) Official statistics of water potential for the year of 2016. http://www.dsi.gov.tr/dsi-resmi-istatistikler/resmi-i-statistikler-2016/2016-yili-verileri. Accessed 29 Aug 2018

  • Ekmekci M (2003) Review of Turkish karst with emphasis on tectonic and paleogeographic controls. Acta Carsologica 32:205–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekmekci M (2010) Sustainable management of water resources. Lecture Notes. Hacettepe University, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekmekci M (2013) Ecohydrological approach to protect water dependent ecosystems. Ministry of Forestry and Water, Symp on Water and Biodiversity 22–23 May 2013 Marmaris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekmekci M (2015) What we learned from CV Thies: is the safe yield safe? General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works Geotechnical and Groundwater Seminar, 4–18 December 2015 Istanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdem U, Nurlu E, Akarsu Z (1998) Degradation problems in the coastal zone lakes of the Aegean region, Turkey: In New Tasks for Ecologists After Rio 1992: Proceedings of VII International Congress of Ecology-INTECOL, Florence, Italy, 19–25 July 1998, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Erol O (1984) Geomorphology and neotectonics of the Pluvial Lake Basins in the Taurus Belt and South Central Anatolia. In: Tekeli O, Goncuoglu C (eds) Proceedings of international symposium on geology of the taurus belt, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford DC, Williams PW (2007) Karst geomorphology and hydrology. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gul A, Onusluel Gul G, Dikmen AC, Kuzucu A (2014) Investigating hydrologic alterations for wetland systems in terms of river environmental flows. Water Environ J 28:329–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunay G (1985) Karst groundwater studies in Manavgat river basin, Turkey. In: Gunay, G, Jhonson, AI (eds) Karst water resources, IAHS Publ. No.161, pp 333–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Izbirak R (2001) Turkey I. Publication of Ministry of Education, Istanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibaroglu A (2006) Legislative framework for water management in Turkey. www.mpfpr.de/…/Water_Law/…Turkey/Kibaroglu_Turkish_Water_Law_English.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2018

  • MTA (1989) Geological map of Turkey scale 1:2.000.000. Publication of General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazik L, Poyraz M (2017) A region that characterize the general karst geomorphology of Turkey: central Anatolia Plateau karst zone. Turkish Geogr Rev 68:43–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazik L, Tuncer K (2010) Regional characteristics of Turkish karst morphology. Turkish Speleology J Karst Caves Res J 1:7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Okay AI (2008) Geology of Turkey: A Synopsis. Anschnitt 21:19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Okay AI, Tuysuz O (1999) Tethyan sutures of northern Turkey. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 156:475–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojay B, Heimann A, Toprak V (2001) Neotectonic and volcanic characteristics of the Karasu fault zone (Anatolia, Turkey): The transition zone between the Dead Sea transform and the East Anatolian fault zone. Geodin Acta 14:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarikaya MA, Zreda M, Ciner A (2011) Quaternary glaciations of Turkey. In: Ehlers J, Gibbard PL, Hughes PD (eds), Quaternary glaciations – extent and chronology: a closer look. Developments in Quaternary Science, vol 15, pp 393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahin S, Toker CE, Abdelwahed MF (2017) The determination of the continental borders in Anatolia region from the long-wavelength gravitational data and seismic velocity perturbation. Eur Int J Sci Technol 6(9):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakiyan J, Yazicigil H (2004) Sustainable development and management of an aquifer system in western Turkey. Hydrogeol J 12:66–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengor AMC, Gorur N, Saroglu F (1985) Strike-slip faulting and related basin formation in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study. SEPM Spec Publ 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymen I (1983) Tectonic features of the Kaman group in comparison with those of its neighbouring formations around Tamadag (Kaman-Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex). Bull Turkish Geol Assoc 26:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanrivermis H, Bulbul M (2007) The role of agriculture in Turkish economy at the beginning of the European Union accession negotiations. J Appl Sci 7(4):612–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekeli O (1981) Subduction complex of pre-Jurassic age, northern Anatolia, Turkey. Geology 9:68–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tezcan L, Meric BT, Dogdu N, Akan B, Atilla AO, Kurttas, T (2002) Hydrogeology and groundwater flow model of Akarçay Basin. Final Report Int Res Center for Karst Water Res, Hacettepe University, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Theis CV (1940) The source of water derived from wells: essential factors controlling the response of an aquifer to development. Civ Eng 10:277–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38:55–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR (1955) The water balance. Lab Clim Publ in Climatology, Centerton 8(1):1–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd DK (1959) Groundwater hydrology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • TUIK (2018) Sectoral water and waste water statistics. http://www.tuik.gov.tr. Accessed 24 Feb 2018

  • Yagbasan O, Yazicigil H (2009) Sustainable management of Mogan and Eymir Lakes in Central Turkey. Environ Geol 56:1029–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yagbasan O, Yazicigil H (2012) Assessing the impacts of climate change on Mogan and Eymir Lakes’ levels in Central Turkey. J Environ Earth Sci 66:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yagbasan O, Yazicigil H, Demir V (2017) Impacts of climatic variables on water-level variations in two shallow Eastern Mediterranean lakes. J Environ Earth Sci 76(575):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazicigil H, Doyuran V, Karahanoglu N, Yanmaz M, Camur MZ, Toprak V, Rojay B, Yilmaz KK, Sakiyan J, Suzen L, Yesilnacar E, Gundogdu A, Pusatli T, Tuzcu B (2000) Investigation and management of groundwater resources in K. Menderes River basin under the scope of revised hydrogeological studies, Final Report, Middle East Technical University, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazicigil H, Ekmekci M (2003) Perspectives on Turkish ground water resources. Ground Water 41:290–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Dr. Levent Tezcan (Hacettepe University) for his support in producing the maps of different rock types. Hatice Kilic (Middle East Technical University) assisted in reproduction of some of the figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Yazicigil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yazicigil, H., Ekmekci, M. (2020). Groundwater. In: Harmancioglu, N., Altinbilek, D. (eds) Water Resources of Turkey. World Water Resources, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11729-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics