Abstract
This chapter questions the traditional formulation of political obligation as why one should obey the civil authority or respect the law. This individualist view sees citizens as atomised subjects taking their decisions in isolation rather than as mutually responsible individuals who collectively exercise their sovereign control over the conduct of their public affairs and incur several political obligations such as not only obeying the law but also disobeying oppressive laws, protesting against injustices and upholding public norms. The traditional discussion is largely conservative, concerned to maintain order and stability, and finds these obligations of active citizenship unsettling. Its bias needs to be exposed and overcome.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parekh, B. (2019). A Misconceived Discourse on Political Obligation. In: Ethnocentric Political Theory. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11708-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11708-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11707-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11708-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)