Abstract
This chapter challenges the dominant view that nationalism is basically a European phenomenon, first emerging in Europe and then spreading to the rest of the world and taking identical forms. This view gives Europe both too much importance and too much responsibility for the world’s ills. Nationalism did emerge in Europe, but every non-European country conceptualised it and blended it with local ideas in its own way and gave it a distinct form. In some societies it was based on religion; in others on ethnicity, language or civilisation. Some had a ‘pan’ element and that too varied from region to region. In many of these societies liberalism was not a dominant tradition, and hence nationalism did not have to come to terms with it or define itself in relation to it. All this means that there were and are multiple nationalisms, each unique but also sharing some common features with others.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parekh, B. (2019). Ethnocentricity of the Nationalist Discourse. In: Ethnocentric Political Theory. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11708-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11708-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11707-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11708-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)