Abstract
In Europe, sovereignty is pooled and bounded and decision-making power is shared by the EU and member states. This chapter sets out the cosmopolitan dimension of Europe’s liberal political order and clarifies why neither the framework of intergovernmentalism nor that of the federal state fit the EU. The framework of regional cosmopolitanism is a promising way to handle unity in diversity. Only respect for the individual—the ultimate unit of moral concern—gives modern law coherence and unity. The chapter then addresses Habermas’ concept of mixed constituent power and explains why it is shaky on constitutional grounds. Thereafter, it argues that there is a political universitas in Europe based on entrenched dignity protection, and that the integration process has created a European community of obligations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See also Bajnai et al. (2012).
- 2.
See the call ‘Founding Europe Anew!’, initiated by Frank Bsirske et al. with 35 signatories (including Habermas) (Bsirske et al. 2012).
- 3.
While in line with the cosmopolitan credo, Habermas prefers ‘to focus on the more specific and demanding perspective of a constitutionalization of international law. The concept of “cosmopolitanism” tempts us to continue an older train of thought, rooted in Stoicism, that bypasses the major problem of how to tame, channel and civilize political power in legal terms even beyond the empire or the modern nation-state’ (Habermas 2014a: 5).
- 4.
- 5.
One cannot, to paraphrase Einstein, solve problems with the same means that produced them.
- 6.
Cited from preamble of the Charter of fundamental Rights of the European Union (European Union 2012b).
- 7.
- 8.
The following sections draw on Eriksen (2014).
- 9.
People may object to a law but still find it legitimate, and orders can be unjust but still legitimate (Rawls 1995: 175).
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
Cf. articles 9–12 and 19(2) TEU (European Union 2012a).
- 13.
See also Meyer (2003: 24ff.) for the wording on ‘Federation of Nation States’ and ‘European people’ in the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights.
- 14.
- 15.
For Kant ‘the ius cosmopoliticum, far from enacting an immediate political and legal recognition of individual members in a supranational collective authority, is mediated by the ius gentium, the right of states’ (Ypi 2008: 352).
- 16.
Representative government has, according to Sieyes, only to do with choosing and changing experts (Urbinati 2006: 147).
- 17.
- 18.
My position is in fact inspired by Habermas’ own procedural conception of popular sovereignty (Habermas 1996; cp. Eriksen and Weigård 2003: 129ff.), as well as of his insight that, ‘The EU constitution, like all modern legal systems […] rests in the final analysis on the subjective rights of the citizens’ (Habermas 2012: 35).
- 19.
‘Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world’, states the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (United Nations 1948: 1).
- 20.
- 21.
See Brunkhorst (2014: 426), and see p. 412 on how dignity was adopted in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the role of Eleanor Roosevelt.
- 22.
The moral standard of having one’s dignity respected is a higher-ranking principle that does not have the same sort of validity as the constitutional principles we live by; it is constitutive for the concept of basic individual human rights and for political equality.
- 23.
Not least have these been visible in the protests and vociferous criticism of austerity measures and the Troika’s dictates in Greece—the protesters’ allegation of humiliation of the Greek population.
References
Altvater, Elmar, et al. 2013. Demokratie oder Kapitalismus? Europa in der Krise. Berlin: Blätter Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
Arendt, Hannah. 1973 [1951]. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
Avbelj, Matej, and Jan Komárek. 2012. Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Oxford: Hart.
Bajnai, Gordon, Thomas Fischer, Stephanie Hare, Sarah Hoffmann, Kalypso Nicolaïdis, Vanessa Rossi, Juri Viehoff, and Andrew Watt. 2012. Solidarity: For Sale? The Social Dimensions of the New European Economic Governance. Europe in Dialogue, 2012/1. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/GP_Solidarity.pdf. Accessed on 6 September 2013.
Brown, Garrett W. 2014. The European Union and Kant’s Idea of Cosmopolitanism: Why the EU Is Not Cosmopolitan. European Journal of International Relations 20 (3): 671–693.
Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2014. Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Evolutionary Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
Bsirske, Frank, Annelie Buntenbach, Rudolf Hicke, Steffen Lehndorff, and Hans-Jürgen Urban. 2012. Call: Founding Europe Anew! Vlaams Marxistisch Tijdschrift 46 (2). http://www.imavo.be/vmt/1222-Call.pdf. Accessed on 6 September 2013.
Bundesverfassungsgericht. 1974. Case BVerfGE 37, 271, Solange I—Decision.
Bundesverfassungsgericht. 1986. Case BVerfGE 73, 339, Solange II—Decision.
Bundesverfassungsgericht. 2009. Judgement of the Second Senate of 30 June 2009, 2 be 2/08. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/EN/2009/06/es20090630_2bve000208en.html. Accessed on 13 June 2017.
Cohen, Jean L. 2012. Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conway, Gerard. 2012. The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duchêne, Francois. 1994. Jean Monnet: The First Statesman of Interdependence. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Eriksen, Erik O. 2014. The Normativity of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eriksen, Erik O., and Jarle Weigård. 2003. Understanding Habermas. London: Continuum.
Eriksen, Erik O., and John Erik Fossum. 2012. Rethinking Democracy and the European Union. London: Routledge.
European Union. 2007. Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community, Signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007, 2007/C 306. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12007L%2FTXT. Accessed on 10 February 2017.
European Union. 2012a. The Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), 2012/C 326. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12012M%2FTXT. Accessed on 10 February 2017.
European Union. 2012b. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, C326/391. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:12012P/TXT.
Fossum, John Erik, and Agustín J. Menéndez. 2011. The Constitution’s Gift: A Constitutional Theory for a Democratic European Union. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Franzius, Claudio. 2010. Europaishe Verfassungsrechtsdenken. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Günther, Klaus. 2017. Divided Sovereignty, Nation and Legal Community. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (2): 213–222.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles? Political Theory 29 (6): 766–781.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2012. The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2014a. A Plea for the Constitutionalization of International Law. Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (1): 5–12.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2014b. Democracy in Europe: Why the Development of the European Union into a Transnational Democracy Is Necessary and How It Is Possible. ARENA Working Paper 13/2014. Oslo: ARENA Center for European Studies.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2014c. Zur Prinzipienkonkurrenz von Bürgergleichheit und Staatengleichheit im supranationalen Gemeinwesen. Eine Notiz aus Anlass der Frage nach der Legitimität der ungleichen Repräsentation der Bürger im Europäischen Parlament. Der Staat 53 (2): 167–192.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2017. Citizen and State Equality in a Supranational Political Community: Degressive Proportionality and the Pouvoir Constituant Mixte. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (2): 171–182.
Jackson, Robert H. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Joas, Hans. 2011. Die Sakralität der Person: Eine neue Genealogie der Menschenrechte. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Kalyvas, Andreas. 2008. Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1996 [1785]. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy, ed. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kramer, Michal. 2010. Human Dignity in German Law, trans. Michael Prawer. Policy Paper No. 85, The Israel Democracy Institute, Jerusalem. https://en.idi.org.il/media/4017/85_abstract_en.pdf.
Lefort, Claude. 1988. Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Leick, Romain. 2013. Our Mothers, Our Fathers: Next-Generation WWII Atonement. Spiegel Online, 28 March. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/zdf-tv-miniseries-reopens-german-wounds-of-wwii-past-a-891332-2.html. Accessed on 6 July 2017.
Locke, John. 1967 [1689]. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Madison, James, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. 1788. Federalist No. 49: Method of Guarding Against the Encroachments of Any One Department of Government by Appealing to the People Through a Convention. New York Packet, 5 February.
Margalit, Avishai. 1996. The Decent Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McCormick, John. 2012. Crisis and the Future of Europe. Cicero Foundation Great Debate Paper 12/06. Paris and Maastricht: The Cicero Foundation.
Meyer, Jürgen. 2003. Kommentar zur Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Milward, A. S. 1984. The Reconstruction of Western Europe 1945–51. London: Routledge.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1993. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, revised by Kenneth W. Thompson. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Niederberger, Andreas. 2009. Demokratie unter Bedingungen der Weltgesellschaft. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Niesen, Peter. 2017. The ‘Mixed’ Constituent Legitimacy of the European Federation. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (2): 183–192.
Offe, Claus, and Ulrich K. Preuss. 2007. The Problem of Legitimacy in the European Polity: Is Democratization the Answer? In The Diversity of Democracy: Corporatism, Social Order and Political Conflict, ed. Colin Crouch and Wolfgang Streeck. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Owen, David. 2018. On the Right to Have Nationality Rights: Statelessness, Citizenship and Human Rights. Netherlands International Law Review 65 (3): 299–317.
Patberg, Markus. 2017. The Leveling Up of Constituent Power in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (2): 203–212.
Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni. 2012 [1486]. Oration on the Dignity of Man: A New Translation and Commentary, ed. Francesco Borghesi, Michael Papio, and Massimo Riva. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, John. 1995. Reply to Habermas. The Journal of Philosophy 95: 132–180.
Risse, Thomas. 2014. No Demos? Identities and Public Spheres in the Euro Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (6): 1207–1215.
Rosen, Michael. 2012. Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schäfer, Armin, and Wolfgang Streeck. 2013. Politics in the Age of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Scheuerman, William E. 2019. Constituent Power and Civil Disobedience: Beyond the Nation State? Journal of International Political Theory 15(1): 49–66.
Schmitt, Carl. 2008 [1928]. Constitutional Theory, trans. Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Schulz, Martin. 2013. Der gefesselte Riese: Europas letzte Chance. Berlin: Von Rowohlt.
Smith, D. 2014. When the Peloton Hit the Mud: Displacement Struggles and the EU Crisis. In The European Union in Crises or the European Union as Crises?, ed. J.E. Fossum and A.J. Menéndez, ARENA Report No 2/14. Oslo: ARENA Centre for European Studies.
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2013. Gekaufte Zeit: Die vertagte Krisedes demokratischen Kapitalismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Thym, Daniel. 2016. ‘Citizens’ and ‘Foreigners’ in EU Law. Migration Law and Its Cosmopolitan Outlook. European Law Journal 22 (3): 296–316.
United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/. Accessed on 13 November 2018.
Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Von Bogdandy, Armin. 2006. Constitutional Principles. In Principles of European Constitutional Law, ed. Armin Von Bogdandy and Jürgen Bast. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Von Bogdandy, Armin, and Jürgen Bast. 2006. Principles of European Constitutional Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Von Bogdandy, Armin, Mattias Kottmann, Carlino Antpöhler, Johanna Dickschen, Simon Hentrei, and Maja Smrkolj. 2012. Reverse Solange—Protecting the Essence of Fundamental Rights Against EU Member States. Common Market Law Review 49 (2): 489–520.
Weiler, Joseph H.H. 1982. Supranational Law and the Supranational System: Legal Structure and Political Process in the European Community. PhD in Law, European University Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/4822. Accessed on 26 May 2017.
Weiler, Joseph H.H. 2001. Federalism Without Constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg. In The Federal Vision, ed. Kalypso Nicolaïdis and Robert Howse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weiler, Joseph H.H. 2003. In Defence of the Status Quo: Europe’s Constitutional Sonderweg. In European Constitutionalism Beyond the State, ed. Joseph H.H. Weiler and Marlene Wind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ypi, Lea. 2008. Sovereignty, Cosmopolitanism and the Ethics of European Foreign Policy. European Journal of Political Theory7 (3): 349–364.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eriksen, E.O. (2019). Constituting Power in Europe. In: Contesting Political Differentiation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11698-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11698-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11697-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11698-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)