Abstract
The need for representing knowledge is ubiquitous in applications; for example, Google needs to represent knowledge about the location and height of building in order to answer questions such as “which is the tallest building in Europe”. Google uses a graph to represent such knowledge, and so-called knowledge graphs are becoming increasingly popular as a knowledge representation formalism. Adding some form of rules greatly increases the power and utility of knowledge graphs, but can also lead to theoretical and/or practical tractability problems. In this papers we will briefly survey the relevant issues and possible solutions, and show that rule enhanced knowledge graphs are extremely powerful, can be given a formal logic-based semantics, and are highly scalable in practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Recall the use of the term “predicate” in RDF triples.
References
Grädel, E., Kolaitis, P.G., Vardi, M.Y.: On the decision problem for two-variable first-order logic. B. Symb. Log. 3(1), 53–69 (1997)
Horrocks, I., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: The even more irresistible \(\cal{SROIQ}\). In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006), pp. 57–67. AAAI Press (2006). download/2006/HoKS06a.pdf
Lehmann, F. (ed.): Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1992)
Motik, B., Nenov, Y., Piro, R., Horrocks, I.: Incremental update of datalog materialisation: the backward/forward algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 29th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2015), pp. 1560–1568. AAAI Press (2015). download/2015/MNPH15b.pdf
Motik, B., Nenov, Y., Piro, R., Horrocks, I., Olteanu, D.: Parallel materialisation of datalog programs in centralised, main-memory RDF systems. In: Proceedings of the 28th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2014), pp. 129–137. AAAI Press (2014). download/2014/MNPHO14a.pdf
Neumann, T., Weikum, G.: The RDF-3X engine for scalable management of RDF data. VLDB J. 19(1), 91–113 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-009-0165-y
OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Profiles, 2nd edn. W3C Recommendation, 11 December 2012. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/
Weiss, C., Karras, P., Bernstein, A.: Hexastore: sextuple indexing for semantic web data management. PVLDB 1(1), 1008–1019 (2008). http://www.vldb.org/pvldb/1/1453965.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Horrocks, I. (2019). Which Is the Tallest Building in Europe? Representing and Reasoning About Knowledge. In: Lossio-Ventura, J., Muñante, D., Alatrista-Salas, H. (eds) Information Management and Big Data. SIMBig 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 898. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11680-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11680-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11679-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11680-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)