Skip to main content

Applications Beyond Local Excision

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is an advanced videoscopic endoluminal platform that blends single-incision laparoscopy with local excision techniques. Since its inception, TAMIS has been used increasingly worldwide as an alternative to traditional transanal excision and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local excision of benign and early-stage rectal cancers in the distal and mid rectum. With the benefits and success of rectal lesion excision, the applications have continued to evolve. In this chapter, we review several applications of TAMIS beyond local excision, for performing established procedures in a minimally invasive transanal approach, facilitating new technology and the development of new approaches, and managing complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, Atallah S. A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:775–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2200–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, Izfar S, Larach SW. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:301–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR, O’Connell PR, Winter DC. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:254–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1026–30; discussion 1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McLemore EC, Weston LA, Coker AM, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benign and malignant rectal neoplasia. Am J Surg. 2014;208:372–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maglio R, Muzi GM, Massimo MM, Masoni L. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): new treatment for early rectal Cancer and large rectal polyps-experience of an Italian center. Am Surg. 2015;81:273–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Verseveld M, Barendse RM, Gosselink MP, Verhoef C, de Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: impact on quality of life and functional outcome. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1184–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Buck van Overstraeten A, Wolthuis AM, D’Hoore A. Transanal completion proctectomy after total colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a modified single stapled technique. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:O141–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leo CA, Samaranayake S, Perry-Woodford ZL, et al. Initial experience of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis by transanal total mesorectal rectal excision and single-incision abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:1162–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. de Buck van Overstraeten A, Mark-Christensen A, Wasmann KA, et al. Transanal versus transabdominal minimally invasive (completion) proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: a comparative study. Ann Surg. 2017;266:878–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Sugihara T, Magishi A, Yamaguchi T, Sano T. Transanal total pelvic exenteration: pushing the limits of transanal total mesorectal excision with transanal pelvic exenteration. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:647–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Sugihara T, et al. Complete transanal total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:872–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Sugihara T, Magishi A, Ono K, Yamaguchi T, Sano T. Transanal total pelvic exenteration with sphincter-preserving surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 May;61(5):641. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, et al. Vaginal access minimally invasive surgery (VAMIS): a new approach to hysterectomy. Surg Innov. 2015;22:344–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baekelandt J. Total vaginal NOTES hysterectomy: a new approach to hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(6):1088–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 May 22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baekelandt J, Cavens D. GelPOINT (applied medical) is a suitable port for transvaginal NOTES procedures. J Gynecol Surg. 2016;32(5):257–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Atallah S, Albert M, Debeche-Adams T, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): applications beyond local excision. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17:239–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Borstlap WA, Harran N, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA. Feasibility of the TAMIS technique for redo pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5364–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ, et al. PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:858–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cirocco WC. The Altemeier procedure for rectal prolapse: an operation for all ages. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1618–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Althoff A, Rowen R, Dakermandji M, Kelly J, Atallah S. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy combined with TAMIS rectopexy: a NOTES operation for rectal procidentia. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21:815–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Al Furajii H, Cahill RA. TAMIS completion proctectomy and concomitant parastomal hernia repair with transperineal mesh fixation – a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Al Furajii H, Cahill RA. Dual endolaparoscopic technique (DUET) for TAMIS proctectomy and concomitant parastomal hernia repair. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20:67–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McCarroll RH, Moore LJ. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for resection of retrorectal cyst. J Surg Case Rep. 2018;2018:rjy021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Warren CD, Hamilton AER, Stevenson ARL. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of rectal lesions with the da Vinci Xi (dVXi): technical considerations and video vignette. Tech Coloproctol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1816-z.

  27. Atallah S. Assessment of a flexible robotic system for endoluminal applications and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): could this be the solution we have been searching for. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21:809–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Erenler I, Aytac E, Bilgin IA, Baca B, Hamzaoglu I, Karahasanoglu T. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) with the da Vinci Xi system – a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Marks J, Ng S, Mak T. Robotic transanal surgery (RTAS) with utilization of a next-generation single-port system: a cadaveric feasibility study. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21:541–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Atallah S, Hodges A, Larach SW. Direct target NOTES: prospective applications for next generation robotic platforms. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22:363–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bong JW, Lim SB. Transanal minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for a completely occluded anastomosis after low anterior resection: a new approach to severe anastomotic stenosis. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12599.

  32. van Koperen PJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C, et al. The Dutch multicenter experience of the endo-sponge treatment for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1379–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for repair of rectourethral fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tobias-Machado M, Mattos PA, Reis LO, Juliano CA, Pompeo AC. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) to treat vesicorectal fistula: a new approach. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41:1020–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cawich SO, Thomas DA, Mohammed F, Bobb NJ, Williams D, Naraynsingh V. A management algorithm for retained rectal foreign bodies. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11:684–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cawich SO, Mohammed F, Spence R, Albert M, Naraynsingh V. Colonic foreign body retrieval using a modified TAMIS technique with standard instruments and trocars. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2015;2015:815616.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Atallah S, Larach SW, Monson JR. Stereotactic navigation for TAMIS-TME. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25:271–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kneist W, Rink AD, Kauff DW, Konerding MA, Lang H. Topography of the extrinsic internal anal sphincter nerve supply during laparoscopic-assisted TAMIS TME: five key zones of risk from the surgeons’ view. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:71–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Keller, D.S. (2019). Applications Beyond Local Excision. In: Atallah, S. (eds) Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11572-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11572-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11571-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11572-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics