Extending a Digital Fraction Game Piece by Piece with Physical Manipulatives

  • Kristian KiiliEmail author
  • Antti Koskinen
  • Antero Lindstedt
  • Manuel Ninaus
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11385)


This paper reports results from an ongoing project that aims to develop a digital game for introducing fractions to young children. In the current study, third-graders played the Number Trace Fractions prototype in which they estimated fraction locations and compared fraction magnitudes on a number line. The intervention consisted of five 30 min playing sessions. Conceptual fraction knowledge was assessed with a paper based pre- and posttest. Additionally, after the intervention students’ fraction comparison strategies were explored with game-based comparison tasks including self-explanation prompts. The results support previous findings indicating that game-based interventions emphasizing fraction magnitudes improve students’ performance in conceptual fraction tasks. Nevertheless, the results revealed that in spite of clear improvement many students tended to use false fraction magnitude comparison strategies after the intervention. It seems that the game mechanics and the feedback that the game provided did not support conceptual change processes of students with low prior knowledge well enough and common fraction misconceptions still existed. Based on these findings we further developed the game and extended it with physical manipulatives. The aim of this extension is to help students to overcome misconceptions about fraction magnitude by physically interacting with manipulatives.


Game-based learning Fraction Number line Conceptual change Manipulatives Serious games Mathematics 


  1. 1.
    Hainey, T., Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., Wilson, A., Razak, A.: A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education. Comput. Educ. 102, 202–223 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H., Van Der Spek, E.D.: A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. J. Educ. Psychol. 105(2), 249–265 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fazio, L.K., Kennedy, C.A., Siegler, R.S.: Improving children’s knowledge of fraction magnitudes. PLoS ONE 11(10), e0165243 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kiili, K., Moeller, K., Ninaus, M.: Evaluating the effectiveness of a game-based rational number training-In-game metrics as learning indicators. Comput. Educ. 120, 13–28 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Riconscente, M.M.: Results from a controlled study of the iPad fractions game Motion Math. Games Cult. 8(4), 186–214 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McMullen, J., Laakkonen, E., Hannula-Sormunen, M., Lehtinen, E.: Modeling the developmental trajectories of rational number concept(s). Learn. Instr. 37, 14–20 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Hoof, J., Vandewalle, J., Verschaffel, L., Van Dooren, W.: In search for the natural number bias in secondary school students’ interpretation of the effect of arithmetical operations. Learn. Instr. 37, 30–38 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siegler, R.S., Fazio, L.K., Bailey, D.H., Zhou, X.: Fractions: the new frontier for theories of numerical development. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 13–19 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeWolf, M., Vosniadou, S.: The representation of fraction magnitudes and the whole number bias reconsidered. Learn. Instr. 37, 39–49 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ni, Y., Zhou, Y.-D.: Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: the origins and implications of whole number bias. Educ. Psychol. 40(1), 27–52 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alibali, M.W., Sidney, P.G.: Variability in the natural number bias: who, when, how, and why. Learn. Instr. 37, 56–61 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stafylidou, S., Vosniadou, S.: The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learn. Instr. 14(5), 503–518 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dole, J.A., Sinatra, G.M.: Reconceptalizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educ. Psychol. 33(2–3), 109–128 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Limn, M.: On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal. Learn. Instr. 11, 357–380 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Merenluoto, K., Lehtinen, E.: Number concept and conceptual change: towards a systematic model of the processes of change. Learn. Instr. 14, 519–534 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ninaus, M., Kiili, K., Siegler, R.S., Moeller, K.: Data-driven design decisions to improve game-based learning of fractions. In: Dias, J., Santos, P.A., Veltkamp, R.C. (eds.) GALA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10653, pp. 3–13. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carbonneau, K.J., Marley, S.C., Selig, J.P.: A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. J. Educ. Psychol. 105(2), 380–400 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tampere University of TechnologyPoriFinland
  2. 2.Leibniz-Institut für WissensmedienTuebingenGermany
  3. 3.LEAD Graduate SchoolEberhard-Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany

Personalised recommendations