Balancing Realism and Engagement for a Serious Game in the Domain of Remote Sensing

  • Daniel AtorfEmail author
  • Ehm Kannegieser
  • Wolfgang Roller
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11385)


This paper elaborates on the development of a serious game in the domain of remote sensing. It describes the challenges of defining the target group and keeping them motivated over several weeks in order to achieve specific learning objectives. Furthermore, the paper states the integration of the game into the pedagogical concept. The paper illustrates in detail how the balance was found between realistic learning objectives and engaging gameplay following the ideas of Immersive Didactics and Digital Game-Based learning. It depicts on how to find close correlation between learning objectives and game objectives while keeping engagement and immersion. In addition, the paper outlines the support for educators and trainers via the implemented editors. Finally, the paper will report about the current evaluation of the game’s learning outcome and user experience.


Balancing realism Game design Pedagogical design Training Remote sensing Digital game-based learning Immersion 


  1. 1.
    Prensky, M.: Digital Game-Based Learning. Paragon House, St. Paul (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strauss, W., Howe, N.: Millennials Rising: The Next Generation. Vintage Original, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On Horiz. 9(5), 1–6 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R. (eds.): A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stipek, D.: Motivation to Learn: From Theory to Practice, 4th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schiefele, U., Schreyer, I.: Intrinsische Lernmotivation und Lernen. Ein Überblick zu Ergebnissen der Forschung. In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, vol. 8, pp. 1–13 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bopp, M.: Immersive Didaktik und Framingprozesse in Computerspielen. In: Neitzel, B., Nohr, R.F. (eds.) Das Spiel mit dem Medium. Partizipation-Immersion-Interaktion. Zur Teilhabe an den Medien von Kunst bis Computerspiel, pp. 170–186. Schüren, Marburg (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chandler, H.M., Chandler, R.: Fundamentals of Game Development. Jones & Bartlett Learning LLC, Sudbury (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Emrich, A.: MicroProse’s strategic space opera is rated XXXX. In: Computer Gaming World, Issue #110, pp. 92–93. Golden Empire Publications, Anaheim Hills (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cairns, P., Cox, A., Berthouze, N., Jennett, C., Dhoparee, S.: Quantifying the experience of immersion in games. In: Cognitive Science of Games and Gameplay Workshop at Cognitive Science (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, C., Perkis, A., Arndt, S.: Spatial immersion versus emotional immersion, which is more immersive? In: 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng, M.-T., She, H.-C., Annetta, L.A.: Game immersion experience: its hierarchical structure and impact on game-based science learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 31(3), 232–253 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Atorf
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ehm Kannegieser
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Roller
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer IOSBKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations