Skip to main content

Experience of Studying the Frame Verbalization in a Scientific Text (Based on the German Language Material)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 332 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 907))

Abstract

This article is devoted to verbalization peculiarities of the scientific knowledge in German. Language fragments, containing different definitions of the same concept, are used as research material. To distinguish between typical and variable knowledge about it, the terms protoframe and exoframe are used in the work, having a slots structure understood as a set of nodes and connections between them. Through the application of frame analysis, an attempt is made to identify the mandatory and optional frame nodes behind each definition. The correlation between the protoframe and the exoframe is considered in the aspect of dynamics of the speech-thinking processes, that is, within the framework of understanding the logic of the processes of generation and understanding of speech. The analysis presented in the work allows us to draw conclusions about the unity of the categorical and linguistic design of scientific concepts and the clarity of the knowledge structuring. In addition, the repetition in the sentence of the same conceptual structures indicates the presence, in the mindset of certain information, processing schemes, through which scientific knowledge acquires a unified form that facilitates the cognitive and communicative interaction of people within the same categorical coordinates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Babushkina, O.N.: Frejmovyj analiz ocenochnyh frazeologizmov, harakterizujushhih professional’nuju dejatel’nost’ [The frame analysis of the estimated phraseological units that characterize professional activity]. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty izuchenija rechevoj dejatel’nosti [Theoretical and applied aspects of the study of speech activity] 6, 40–45 (2011). (in Russian)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Butorin, S.V.: Frejmovyj podhod k analizu jazykovogo prostranstva nemeckogo romana-vospitanija [A frame approach to the analysis of the linguistic space of the German novel-education]. Izvestija Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossijskoj akademii nauk 12(3–3), 761–765 (2010). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charniak, E.: Context recognition in language comprehension. In: Lehnert, W.G., Ringle, M.H. (eds.) Strategies for Natural Language processing, pp. 435–454. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dijk van, T.A., Kintsch, W.: Strategii ponimanija svjaznogo teksta [Strategies of Discourse Comprehension]. Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike: Kognitivnye aspekty jazyka [New in foreign linguistics: Cognitive aspects of language], vol. 23. Progress, Moscow (1988). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fillmore, C.J.: An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In: Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol.1, pp. 123–131. Progress, Moscow (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gavrilova, T.A., Chervinskaya, K.R.: Izvlechenie i strukturirovanie znanij dlja jekspertnyh system [Extraction and structuring of knowledge for expert systems]. Radio and Communication, Moscow (1992). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gusev, V.V.: Jempaticheskaja model’ v formirovanii strategii perevoda [Empathetic model in the formation of the translation strategy]. Vestn. MSLU 480, 26–41 (2003). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kasevich, V.B.: Semantika. Sintaksis. Morfologiya [Semantics. Syntax. Morphology]. In: Churilina, L.N. (ed.) Aktual’nye problemy sovremennoj lingvistiki [Actual problems of modern linguistics], pp. 344–368. Flinta-Nauka, Moscow (2009). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klyoster, A.M., Shnyakina, N.Y.: K voprosu o kategorial’nom chlenenii nauchnogo i obydennogo znaniya [Categorical division of scientific and everyday knowledge]. Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki 1(54), 144–150 (2018). (in Russian)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klyoster, A.M.: Frejmovyj analiz nemeckoj terminosistemy inzhenernoj psihologii [Frame analysis of the German terminology of engineering psychology]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta 3, 249–255 (2011). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kubryakova, E.S.: Frejm [Frame]. In: Kubryakova, E.S. (ed.) Kratkij slovar’ kognitivnyh terminov [A brief dictionary of cognitive terms], pp. 187–189. Filologicheskij fakul’tet MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova, Moscow (1997). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marchuk, JuN: Metody modelirovanija perevoda [Methods of translation modeling]. Nauka, Moscow (1985). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maslennikova, E.M.: Frejmovoe predstavlenie semantiki teksta [Frame representation of text semantics]. Lingvisticheskij vestnik 2, 114–124 (2000). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Merkulova, N.V.: Frejmovyj analiz teksta v aspekte onomastiki hu-dozhestvennogo diskursa [Frame analysis of the text in the aspect of onomastics of artistic discourse]. Nauchnyj vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo arhitekturno-stroitel’nogo universiteta: Sovremennye lingvisticheskie i metodiko-didakticheskie issledovanija [Modern linguistic and methodical-didactic studies] 10, 22–28 (2008). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Minsky, M.L.: A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston, P.H. (ed.) The Psychology of Computer Vision, pp. 211–277. McGraw-Hill, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nefedova, L.A., Remhe, I.N.: Kognitivnye osobennosti perevoda nauchno-tehnicheskogo teksta [Cognitive features of the translation of the scientific and technical text]. Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki 2(100), 27–32 (2008). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nikonova, Zh.V.: Osnovnye jetapy frejmovogo analiza rechevyh aktov (na materiale sovremennogo nemeckogo jazyka) [The main stages of the frame analysis of speech acts (on the basis of modern German language)]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Serija: Filologija. Iskusstvovedenie 6, 224–228 (2008). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Novodranova, V.F.: Kognitivnye aspekty terminologii [Cognitive aspects of terminology]. In: Novodranova, V.F. (eds.) Kognitivnaya lingvistika: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya [Cognitive linguistics: current state and prospects of development], pp. 13–16. Izd-vo Tambov. gos. un-ta., Tambov (1998). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pospelov, D.A.: Prikladnaja semiotika i iskusstvennyj intellekt [Applied Semiotics and Artificial Intelligence]. Programmnye produkty i sistemy [Software products and systems] (1996). http://swsys.ru/index.php?page=article&id=1079. Accessed 11 May 2018. (in Russian)

  20. Shirokolobova, A.G.: Frejmovyj analiz terminosistemy gidrotehniki russkogo i anglijskogo jazykov [Frame analysis of the terminology of hydraulic engineering of Russian and English languages]. Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki 1, 52–56 (2011). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Starostina, E.V.: Frejmovyj analiz russkih glagolov povedenija [Frame analysis of Russian verbs of behavior]: Extended abstract of a doctoral theses. Saratov State University (2004). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sytnikova, T.A.: Frejmovyj analiz terminologii predmetnoj oblasti (na primere anglojazychnoj komp’juternoj tehnicheskoj terminosistemy) [Frame analysis of domain terminology (using the English computer technical terminology system as an example)] (2008). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/freymovyy-analiz-terminologii-predmetnoy-oblasti-na-primere-angloyazychnoy-kompyuternoy-tehnicheskoy-terminosistemy. Accessed 14 Aug 2018. (in Russian)

  23. Ventsov, A.V., Kasevich, V.B.: Problemy vosprijatija rechi [Problems of speech perception]. URSS Editorial, Moscow (2003). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zalevskaya, A.A.: Vvedenie v psiholingvistiku [Introduction to Psycholinguistics]. Rossijsk. gos. gumanit. un-t, Moscow (2007). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zwilling, M.Ya.: Kognitivnye modeli i perevod [Cognitive models and translation]. Vestn. MGLU 480, 21–26 (2003). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna M. Klyoster .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Klyoster, A.M., Shnyakina, N. (2019). Experience of Studying the Frame Verbalization in a Scientific Text (Based on the German Language Material). In: Anikina, Z. (eds) Going Global through Social Sciences and Humanities: A Systems and ICT Perspective. GGSSH 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 907. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11473-2_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics