Skip to main content

Problem-Oriented Learning Based on Use of Shared Experimental Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 508 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 909))

Abstract

This paper describes needs, possibilities, and implementation of open educational resources, which are supporting the problem-oriented engineering education based on realistic experimental results. Experimental results can partly substitute real experimentation which is necessary part of engineering education and research. Open educational resources and use of blended learning approach can improve relevancy and decrease costs of engineering education for the majority of engineering schools. These approaches include mobile learning concepts. Also, laboratories via the Internet are one way of sharing laboratory resources in order to increase the availability of experimental work. But there are many situations in which the use of Internet-mediated laboratories is nonrealistic. On the other hand, trained staff and hands-on laboratories and experimental installations are very limited resources at all engineering faculties in countries like Serbia. Because of that, the web portals for sharing experimental data (with defined experimental protocols and all relevant descriptions and tutorials) can be useful for mobile learning applications and engineering education and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. de Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). History of problem based and project based learning. In Management of change (pp. 1–8). Sense Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3(2), 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalúz, M., et al. (2014). ArPi Lab: A low-cost remote laboratory for control education. In 19th World Congress the International Federation of Automatic Control (pp. 9057–9062), August 24–29, Cape Town, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matijevic, M., Nedeljkovic, M., Cantrak, D. J., & Jovic, N. (2017). Remote labs and problem oriented engineering education. In IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1390–1395), April 25–28, Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heradio, R., et al. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in control education: A survey. Annual Reviews in Control, 42, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nedeljkovic, M., et al. (2018). Engineering education lab setup ready for remote operation—Pump system hydraulic performance. In IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1175–1182), April 17–20, Canary Islands, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gillet, D., et al. (2017). Monitoring, awareness and reflection in blended technology enhanced learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(2/3), 126. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2017.10005147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillet, D., et al. (2017) Cloud ecosystem for supporting inquiry learning with online labs: Creation, personalization, and exploitation. In Proceedings of 2017 4th Experiment at International Conference: Online Experimentation (pp. 208–213). https://doi.org/10.1109/expat.2017.7984406.

  9. Matijevic, M. (2018). I/O data for laboratory model PT326 Feedback Ltd., Mendeley Data, v2. http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/xw8sg9x8cm.2.

  10. Mendeley Limited, Registered Office the Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1 GB, United Kingdom. https://data.mendeley.com/datasets.

  11. Matijevic, M. (2018). Inquiry Learning Space (ILS): Heat flow experiment—Modeling and control—Sharing of experimental results, sharing and authoring platform. http://graasp.eu/s/oy04aj, http://graasp.eu and https://www.golabz.eu.

  12. Tenopir, C., et al. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS ONE, 6(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Almeida, R., Mendes, N., & Madeira, H. (2010), Sharing experimental and field data: The AMBER raw data repository experience. In Proceedings—International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (pp. 313–320). https://doi.org/10.1109/icdcsw.2010.75.

  14. Sicilia, M. A., García-Barriocanal, E., & Sánchez-Alonso, S. (2017). Community curation in open dataset repositories: Insights from Zenodo, Procedia Computer Science, 106, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Govaerts, S., et al. (2015). Tutoring teachers—Building an online tutoring platform for the teacher community. In Immersive education, communications in computer and information science (Vol. 486). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22017-8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Manske, S., et al. (2015). Exploring deviation in inquiry learning: Degrees of freedom or source of problems?. In Proceedings of the 23th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., et al. (2015). Orchestrating inquiry-based learning spaces: An analysis of teacher needs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9412, pp. 131–142). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25515-6_12.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Cao, Y., et al. (2014). Helping each other teach: Design and realisation of a social tutoring platform. In Journal of Immersive Education (JiED)—Proceedings of 4th European Immersive Education Summit (pp. 1–11).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sergis, S., et al. (2017). Using educational data from teaching and learning to inform teachers’ reflective educational design in inquiry-based STEM education. In Computers in human behavior (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Manske, S., & Cao, Y. (2015). Go-Lab global online science labs for inquiry learning at school specifications of the lab owner and cloud services (Deliverable D4.8 Grant Agreement no. 317601), Go-Lab consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li, N., et al. (2014). Enforcing privacy for teenagers in online inquiry learning spaces. In Understanding Teen UX workshop at CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/197892.

  22. Vozniuk, A., et al. (2015). Contextual learning analytics apps to create awareness in blended inquiry learning. In 2015 International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ithet.2015.7218029.

  23. Gillet, D., & Bogdanov, E. (2013). Cloud-Savvy contextual spaces as agile personal learning environments or informal knowledge management solutions. In 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET 2013 (pp. 2–7). https://doi.org/10.1109/ithet.2013.6671011.

  24. Matijević, M., et al. (2014). The development and implementation of a thermal process trainer for control and measurement via the Internet. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 22(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20543.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Matijević, M., et al. (2017). Laboratory model of coupled electrical drives for supervision and control via internet. In Proceedings of the REV2017—14th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (p. 592–607), March 15–17. New York, USA: Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64352-6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stefanovic, M., Matijevic, M., & Lazic, D. (2013). Experimental plant for supervision and monitoring of an intermittent heating system for engineering training. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(3), 799–807. ISSN 0949-149.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Go-Lab Support Area. (2018). Video-tutorials devoted to the Go-Lab Ecosystem, its interfaces, and particular applications. http://support.golabz.eu/videos?category=5&page=0.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partly funded by the SCOPES project IZ74Z0_160454/1 “Enabling Web-based Remote Laboratory Community and Infrastructure” of Swiss National Science Foundation and partly by projects TR 35046 and TR33047 Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development Republic of Serbia which is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milan Matijević .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Matijević, M., Nedeljković, M.S., Čantrak, Đ.S., Janković, N. (2019). Problem-Oriented Learning Based on Use of Shared Experimental Results. In: Auer, M., Tsiatsos, T. (eds) Mobile Technologies and Applications for the Internet of Things. IMCL 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 909. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11434-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics