Advertisement

Persistence of Social Exclusion in Tanzania

  • Amedeus MalisaEmail author
Chapter
  • 133 Downloads
Part of the Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being book series (EIAP)

Abstract

Social exclusion can be defined as a practice where individuals are fully or partially excluded from social, economic and cultural networks. Hence, the concept of social exclusion is multidimensional and associated with economic, social, political and cultural aspects. This paper analyses the causes of social exclusion. It specifically explores the reasons why an individual experiences social exclusion today on the assumption that this may lead to similar experiences in the future. Literature suggests that there are two underlying processes that lead to the persistence of social exclusion. One, individuals are heterogeneous in terms of observed and unobserved adverse characteristics which are important for someone to experience social exclusion over time. Second, individuals may experience social exclusion due to state dependency, that is, the experience of social exclusion in one period may itself incite the chances of experiencing it in subsequent periods. Differentiating the two processes is important because policy options for addressing the two social exclusion processes are also different. Using data from the Tanzania National Panel Survey (TZNPS), this paper provides new evidence on the state of social exclusion in Tanzania.

Keywords

Social exclusion Unobserved heterogeneity Tanzania 

JEL Classification

J12 J13 

References

  1. Ahn, S. C., & Schmidt, P. (1995). Efficient estimation of models for dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. R. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arulampalam, W., Booth, A. L., & Taylor, M. P. (2000). Unemplyment persistence. Oxford Economic Papers, 52(1), 24–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, A. B. (1992). Measuring poverty and differences in family composition. Economica, 59(233), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bask, M. (2008). A longitudinal approach to social exclusion in Sweden (Doctoral Thesis in Sociology, Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology, Umeå).Google Scholar
  6. Bhala, A., & Lapeyre, F. (1997). Social exclusion: Towards an analytical and operational framework. Development and Change, 28(3), 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biewen, M. (2004). Measuring state dependence in individual poverty status: Are there feedback effects to employment decisions and household composition? Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  8. Brandolini, A., & D’Alessio, G. (1998). Measuring well-being in the functioning space. Rome: Bank of Italy.Google Scholar
  9. Burchardt, T. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept and evidence. In D. Gordon & P. Townsend (Eds.), Breadline Europe: The measurement of poverty (pp. 385–406). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  10. Castel, R. (1995). Les me’tamorphoses de la question sociale. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  11. Chakravarty, S. R., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2006). The measurement of social exclusion. Review of Income and Wealth, 52(3), 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durkheim, E. (1897). Le suicide: E’tude de sociologie. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, P., & Murie, A. (1999). Literature review of social exclusion. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit.Google Scholar
  14. Nolan, B., Whelan, C. T., Maitre, B., & Layte, R. (2001). Income deprivation and economic strain: An analysis of the European Community Household Panel. European Sociological Review, 17(4), 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Poggi, A. (2007). Does persistence of social exclusion exist in Spain? The Journal of Economic Inequality, 5(1), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scuttella, R., Wilkins, R., & Kostenko, W. (2009). Estimates of poverty and social exclusion in Australia: A multidimensional approach. Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 26/09, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne and Brotherhood of St Laurence.Google Scholar
  17. Sen, A. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application and scrutiny. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  18. Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133, 5–6.Google Scholar
  19. Stouffer, S. A., Lumsdaine, A. A., Lumsdaine, M. H., Williams, R. M., Jr., Smith, M. B., Janis, I. L., & Cottrell, L. S., Jr. (1949). The American soldier: Combat and its aftermath (Studies in social psychology in World War II, Vol. 2). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Tsakloglou, P., & Papadopoulos, F. (2002). Poverty, material deprivation and multi-dimensional disadvantage during four life stage: Evidence from ECHP. In E. Elgar, Cheltenham, & C. Heady (Eds.), Poverty and social exclusion in Europe. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  21. Vrooman, J. C., & Hoff, S. J. (2013). The disadvantaged among the Dutch: A survey approach to the multidimensional measurement of social exclusion. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 1261–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wooldridge, J. (2005). Simple solution to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, non-linear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(1), 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of Economics, Finance and StatisticsJönköping International Business School (JIBS), Jönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations