Abstract
This chapter summarises key arguments developed in the book. It encapsulates the main ways in which the proposed metric can lead to institutional epistemic justice, whereby universities actively seek epistemic equality for all students. The conclusion returns to ideas about ways in which oppression in education is created and summarises the model for a TEF metric that can help deliver a process of sustained liberation from the influences of histories, public policies, coloniality and rankings that contribute to this oppression and prevent epistemic democracy from becoming a referent of teaching excellence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, E. (2012). Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 163–173.
Dahl, R. (2000). On democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Foucault, M. (2002). Archaeology of knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (MB Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum (published as Penguin Classics 2017).
Hayes, A. (2018). Nation boundedness and international students’ marginalisation: What’s emotion got to do with it? International Studies in Sociology of Education, 27(2–3), 288–306.
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. London: Springer.
Lee, J. J., & Rice, C. (2007). Welcome to America? International student perceptions of discrimination. Higher Education, 53(3), 381–409.
Madge, C., Raghuram, P., & Noxolo, P. (2009). Engaged pedagogy and responsibility: A postcolonial analysis of international students. Geoforum, 40(1), 34–45.
Marginson, S. (2013). Equals or others? Mobile students in a nationally bordered world. In S. Sovic & M. Blythman (Eds.), International students negotiating higher education (pp. 9–27). London: Routledge.
Naidoo, R. (2016). The competition fetish in higher education: Varieties, animators and consequences. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 1–10.
Schartner, A., & Cho, Y. (2017). ‘Empty signifiers’ and ‘dreamy ideals’: Perceptions of the ‘international university’ among higher education students and staff at a British university. Higher Education, 74(3), 455–472.
Stein, S., Andreotti, V. D. O., & Suša, R. (2016). ‘Beyond 2015’, within the modern/colonial global imaginary? Global development and higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1247737.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hayes, A. (2019). Concluding Remarks. In: Inclusion, Epistemic Democracy and International Students. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11401-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11401-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11400-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11401-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)