Abstract
This chapter begins the practical part of the book by reviewing the nature and scope of data already collected by the higher education sector (nationally in the UK and internationally) and critiquing their ‘suitability’ for the metric outlined in Chapters 3, 4 and 5. This chapter also conceptualises the nature of the analysis of these data to show what kind of data modelling is required for the proposed metric, in order for the metric to measure outcomes that focus on the extent to which epistemic inclusion of international students is realised through specific characteristics of the teaching process. Conceptualisations of the analysis process in this chapter draw attention to the ways in which the TEF can lead to significant systemic changes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altbach, P. G. (2015). AHELO: The myth of measurement and comparability. International Higher Education, 82, 2–3.
CALOHEE Policy Note. (2017). Towards a more reliable model for evidence based learning and quality assurance and enhancement. Tuning Calohee. Accessed on 26 July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.calohee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CALOHEE-Policy-Note.pdf.
CALOHEE Working Paper. (2017). Calohee working paper for civic, social and cultural engagement. Tuning Calohee. Accessed on 26 July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.calohee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Working-Paper-for-Civic-Social-and-Cultural-Engagement.pdf.
Crowther, P., Joris, M., Otten, M., Nilsson, B., Teekens, H., & Wächter, B. (2000). Internationalisation at home: A position paper. Accessed on 26 July 2018. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary.
Dunne, C. (2011). Developing an intercultural curriculum within the context of the internationalisation of higher education: Terminology, typologies and power. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(5), 609–622.
Grove, J. (2015). NSS results unrelated to teaching quality, study claims. Times Higher Education. Accessed on 26 July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/nss-results-unrelated-teaching-quality-study-claims.
Havergal, C. (2015). UK Engagement Survey: Universities have limited impact on students’ ‘soft’ skill development. Times Higher Education. Accessed on 26 July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/uk-engagement-survey-universities-have-limited-impact-students-soft-skill-development.
Hayes, A. (2017). The teaching excellence framework in the United Kingdom: An opportunity to include international students as “equals”? Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(5), 483–497.
Hayes, A. (2018). Nation boundedness and international students’ marginalisation: What’s emotion got to do with it? International Studies in Sociology of Education, 27(2–3), 288–306.
Jones, E., & Killick, D. (2007). Internationalisation of the curriculum. In E. Jones & S. Brown (Eds.), Internationalising higher education (pp. 109–119). London: Routledge.
Jones, S., Pampaka, M., Swain, D., & Skyrme, J. (2017). Contextualising degree-level achievement: An exploration of interactions between gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status and school type at one large UK university. Research in Post-compulsory Education, 22(4), 455–476.
King, J. (2015). TEF must become ‘evidenced reflection’ of the impact of teaching (Dame Julia King’s opinion piece published in Times Higher Education on 24 July 2015). Accessed on 26 July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/tef-must-become-evidenced-reflection-impact-teaching.
Klein, S., Benjamin, R., Shavelson, R., & Bolus, R. (2007). The collegiate learning assessment: Facts and fantasies. Evaluation Review, 31(5), 415–439.
Leask, B., & Bridge, C. (2013). Comparing internationalisation of the curriculum in action across disciplines: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43(1), 79–101.
Lee, J. J., & Rice, C. (2007). Welcome to America? International student perceptions of discrimination. Higher Education, 53(3), 381–409.
Liu, W., & Lin, X. (2016). Meeting the needs of Chinese international students: Is there anything we can learn from their home system? Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(4), 357–370.
Malcolm, Z. T., & Mendoza, P. (2014). Afro-Caribbean international students’ ethnic identity development: Fluidity, intersectionality, agency, and performativity. Journal of College Student Development, 55(6), 595–614.
Marginson, S. (2012). Including the other: Regulation of the human rights of mobile students in a nation-bound world. Higher Education, 63, 497–512.
Marginson, S. (2013). Equals or others? Mobile students in a nationally bordered world. In S. Sovic & M. Blythman (Eds.), International students negotiating higher education (pp. 9–27). London: Routledge.
Marginson, S. (2018). The UK in the global student market: Second place for how much longer? London: Centre for Global Higher Education, UCL Institute of Education.
Minsky, C. (2015). Universities in mainland Europe go head-to-head with the UK. Times Higher Education. Accessed on 26 July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/news/universities-mainland-europe-go-head-head-uk.
Mwale, S., Alhawsawi, S., Sayed, Y., & Rind, I. A. (2018). Being a mobile international postgraduate research student with family in the United Kingdom: Conflict, contestation and contradictions. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 42(3), 301–312.
Oikonomidoy, E., & Williams, G. (2013). Enriched or latent cosmopolitanism? Identity negotiations of female international students from Japan in the US. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(3), 380–393.
Rizvi, F. (2009). Towards cosmopolitan learning. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30, 253–268.
Ross, J. (2018). Australian universities design their own performance funding test. Times Higher Education. Accessed on 26 July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/australian-universities-design-their-own-performance-funding-test.
Seeber, M., Cattaneo, M., Huisman, J., & Paleari, S. (2016). Why do higher education institutions internationalize? An investigation of the multilevel determinants of internationalization rationales. Higher Education, 72(5), 685–702.
Shahjahan, R. A. (2013). Coloniality and a global testing regime in higher education: Unpacking the OECD’s AHELO initiative. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 676–694.
Spiro, J. (2014). Learning interconnectedness: Internationalisation through engagement with one another. Higher Education Quarterly, 68, 65–84.
Spybrook, J., Shi, R., & Kelcey, B. (2016). Progress in the past decade: An examination of the precision of cluster randomized trials funded by the US Institute of Education Sciences. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39(3), 255–267.
The British Council. (2018, January). International student mobility to 2027: Local investment, global outcomes. Education Intelligence Feature, The British Council. Available from https://ei.britishcouncil.org/educationintelligence/ei-feature-international-student-mobility-2027-local-investment-global-outcome.
Toogood, A. (2015, September 15–17). The expectation-experience gap of higher education tourists. Paper presented at the annual BERA conference, Belfast.
Tran, L. T. (2016). Mobility as ‘becoming’: A Bourdieuian analysis of the factors shaping international student mobility. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(8), 1268–1289.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hayes, A. (2019). Suitable Data. In: Inclusion, Epistemic Democracy and International Students. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11401-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11401-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11400-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11401-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)