Advertisement

Policy Representations of International Students in the UK

  • Aneta HayesEmail author
Chapter
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter reviews policy representations of international students in the UK, evoking imperial echoes, which in later years translated into constructions of international students as people who are educationally and culturally inferior. Two key arguments are made in relation to the role of the TEF in changing these constructions. The first one posits that if the TEF does not include a new metric assessing the type of teaching that will ‘obligate’ universities to realise international students as democratic ‘equals’, their status quo as ‘inferiors’ will be maintained. The second argument asserts that through this new metric, the TEF could create opportunities for assessments of internationalisation that are distanced from historical and socio-political influences that have produced uneven lines of global connection at universities which are revealed in the extracts from student interviews cited towards the end of the chapter.

References

  1. Baker, M. (2012). Modernity/coloniality and Eurocentric education: Towards a post-occidental self-understanding of the present. Policy Futures in Education, 10(1), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blair, T. (1999, June 18). Attracting more international students [Speech to London School of Economics launching Prime Minister’s Initiative]. Accessed on 5 July 2018. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20070701135817/http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page3369.asp.
  3. Bolsmann, C., & Miller, D. R. (2008). International student recruitment to universities in England: Discourse, rationales and globalisation. Globalisation, Societies & Education, 6(1), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clover, D. (2012, July 4–6). Special relations: The University of London and the University College of the West Indies. Paper delivered at the 36th Annual Conference of the Society for Caribbean Studies, Rewley House and Kellogg College, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Da Silva, D. F. (2015). Globality. Critical Ethnic Studies, 1(1), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giroux, H. A. (2000). Racial politics, pedagogy, and the crisis of representation in academic multiculturalism. Social Identities, 6(4), 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grove, J. (2012). Immigration minister wants more scrutiny of ‘value’ of foreign students. Times Higher Education. Accessed on 5 July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/immigration-minister-wants-more-scrutiny-of-value-of-foreign-students/418924.article.
  8. Gu, Q., & Schweisfurth, M. (2015). Transnational connections, competences and identities: Experiences of Chinese international students after their return ‘home’. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 947–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayes, A. (2017). The teaching excellence framework in the United Kingdom: An opportunity to include international students as “equals”? Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(5), 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayes, A. (2018). Nation boundedness and international students’ marginalisation: What’s emotion got to do with it? International Studies in Sociology of Education, 27(2–3), 288–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayes, A. (2019). ‘We loved it because we felt that we existed there in the classroom!’: International students as epistemic equals versus double-country oppression. Journal of Studies in International Education.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319826304.
  12. Hillman, N. (2015). Keeping up with the Germans? A comparison of student funding, internationalisation and research in UK and German universities. Oxford, England: Higher Education Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Hillman, N. (2016, October 13). The UK government’s latest baad idea: Sorting sheep from goats. Times Higher Education, no. 2, 276.Google Scholar
  14. Kapoor, I. (2014). Psychoanalysis and development: Contributions, examples, limits. Third World Quarterly, 35, 1120–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leal, M. N. (2017). Commodity versus common good: Internationalization in Latin-American higher education. In BCES Conference Books (Vol. 15). Sofia: Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.Google Scholar
  16. Li-Hua, R., Wilson, J., Aouad, G., & Li, X. (2011). Strategic aspects of innovation and internationalization in higher education: The Salford PMI2 experience. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lillyman, S., & Bennett, C. (2014). Providing a positive learning experience for international students studying at UK universities: A literature review. Journal of Research in International Education, 13(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lomer, S. (2014). Economic objects: How policy discourse in the United Kingdom represents international students. Policy Futures in Education, 12(2), 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lord Bilimoria of Chelsea. (2016, November 17). Speech—Immigration: Overseas students. Accessed on 5 July 2018. Retrieved from http://www.lordbilimoria.co.uk/speech-immigration-overseas-students/.
  20. Macaulay, T. B. (1835). Minute by the Hon’ble. In H. Sharp (Ed.), Bureau of education: Selections from educational records, Part I (1781–1839) (pp. 107–117). Calcutta: Superintendent, Government Printing, 1920. Reprint. Delhi: National Archives of India, 1965.Google Scholar
  21. Madge, C., Raghuram, P., & Noxolo, P. (2009). Engaged pedagogy and responsibility: A postcolonial analysis of international students. Geoforum, 40(1), 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marginson, S. (2013). Equals or others? Mobile students in a nationally bordered world. In S. Sovic & M. Blythman (Eds.), International students negotiating higher education (pp. 9–27). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Mignolo, W. (2003). Globalization and the geopolitics of knowledge: The role of the humanities in the corporate university. Nepantla: Views from South 4(1), 97–119.Google Scholar
  24. Mwale, S., Alhawsawi, S., Sayed, Y., & Rind, I. A. (2018). Being a mobile international postgraduate research student with family in the United Kingdom: Conflict, contestation and contradictions. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 42(3), 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parker, G. & Warrell. H. (2017). Amber Rudd urges removal of students from net migration data. The Financial Times [online]. Accessed 5 July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/1c51a9dc-c3c3-11e7-a1d2-6786f39ef675.
  26. Pietsch, T. (2012). Imperial echoes. Times Higher Education, no. 2040, 41–45. Education Abstracts.Google Scholar
  27. Silver, H., & Silver, P. (1997). Students: Changing roles, changing lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Stein, S., Andreotti, V. D. O., & Suša, R. (2016). ‘Beyond 2015’, within the modern/colonial global imaginary? Global development and higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1247737.
  29. Sutherland, A., Edgar, D., & Duncan, P. (2015). International infusion in practice—From cultural awareness to cultural intelligence. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 3(3), 32–40.Google Scholar
  30. The Conservative Manifesto. (2017). Forward together: Our plan for a stronger Britain and a prosperous future. Accessed on 11 July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.conservatives.com/manifesto.
  31. Walker, P. (2014). International student policies in UK higher education from colonialism to the coalition: Developments and consequences. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(4), 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams, P. (1984). Britain’s full-cost policy for overseas students. Comparative Education Review, 28(2), 258–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Williams, L. (1990). Country studies on student mobility. London, UK: Overseas Students Trust.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Science and Public PolicyKeele UniversityKeeleUK

Personalised recommendations