Policy as Power

  • Aneta HayesEmail author


This opening chapter of the book examines key theoretical ideas about ‘policy a power’. It aims to show how, through policies, a hegemonic system of power relations is established and to highlight the fact that key issues affecting inclusion and equality of international students are mostly systemic. By extension, drawing on the same theoretical ideas, the chapter also posits that democratisation of university classrooms based on inclusion of international students as equals will only start when it is ‘recommended’ by policies and officially ‘measured’ through university rankings. The chapter begins to highlight the potential contribution of the TEF in this area.


  1. Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson Higher Education.Google Scholar
  3. Bacchi, C., & Bonham, J. (2014). Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications. Foucault Studies, 17, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. (2012). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in sociology. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bhardwa, S. (2017). Canada is the most popular destination for international students. Accessed on 4 July 2018. Retrieved from
  6. Birrell, B., & Perry, B. (2009). Immigration policy change and the international student industry. People and Place, 17(2), 64–80.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L., & Jones, I. (2013). Encounters with racism and the international student experience. Studies in Higher Education, 38(7), 1004–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiose, S. (2015). New immigration rules risk leaving international students behind. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from
  9. Crowther, P., Joris, M., Otten, M., Nilsson, B., Teekens, H., & Wächter, B. (2000). Internationalisation at home: A position paper (P. Crowther, Ed.). Amsterdam: European Association for International Education.Google Scholar
  10. Davids, M. N. (2014). Using Foucauldian “discursive practices” as conceptual framework for the study of teachers’ discourses of HIV and sexuality. Perspectives in Education, 32(3), 36–49.Google Scholar
  11. Desai-Trilokekar, R., Thomson, K., & El Masri, A. (2016). International students as “ideal” immigrants: Ontario employers’ perspective. Accessed on 4 July 2018. Retrieved from’ideal’_immigrants_Ontario_employers’_perspective.
  12. Enders, J. (2004). Higher education, internationalisation, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges to governance theory. Higher Education, 47(3), 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (2002). Archaeology of knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. França, T., Alves, E., & Padilla, B. (2018). Portuguese policies fostering international student mobility: a colonial legacy or a new strategy? Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(3), 325–338.Google Scholar
  16. Ghiso, M. P., & Campano, G. (2013). Coloniality and education: Negotiating discourses of immigration in schools and communities through border thinking. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(2), 252–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorski, P. C. (2008). Good intentions are not enough: A decolonizing intercultural education. Intercultural education, 19(6), 515–525.Google Scholar
  18. Graf, L. (2009). Applying the varieties of capitalism approach to higher education: Comparing the internationalisation of German and British universities. European Journal of Education, 44(4), 569–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, P. M., & McGinty, P. J. (1997). Policy as the transformation of intentions: Producing program from statute. Sociological Quarterly, 38(3), 439–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harper, S. R., Davis, C. F., & Smith, E. J. (2016). A critical race case analysis of black undergraduate student success at an urban university. Urban Education, 53(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harwood, S. A., Huntt, M. B., Mendenhall, R., & Lewis, J. A. (2012). Racial microaggressions in the residence halls: Experiences of students of color at a predominantly White university. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5(3), 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayes, A. (2017). Why international students have been “TEF-ed out”? Educational Review, 69(2), 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayes, A. (2018). Nation boundedness and international students’ marginalisation: What’s emotion got to do with it? International Studies in Sociology of Education.
  24. Hayes, A. (2019). ‘We loved it because we felt that we existed there in the classroom!’: International students as epistemic equals versus double-country oppression. Journal of Studies in International Education.
  25. Houshmand, S., Spanierman, L. B., & Tafarodi, R. W. (2014). Excluded and avoided: Racial microaggressions targeting Asian international students in Canada. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnstone, C., & Proctor, D. (2018). Aligning institutional and national contexts with internationalization efforts. Innovative Higher Education, 43(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lomer, S. (2017). Soft power as a policy rationale for international education in the UK: A critical analysis. Higher Education, 74(4), 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marginson, S. (2012). Including the other: Regulation of the human rights of mobile students in a nation-bound world. Higher Education, 63(4), 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marginson, S. (2013). Equals or others? Mobile students in a nationally bordered world. In S. Sovic & M. Blythman (Eds.), International students negotiating higher education (pp. 9–27). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Matus, C. (2006). Interrupting narratives of displacement: International students in the United States. Perspectives in Education, 24(4), 81–92.Google Scholar
  31. McCartney, D. M. (2016). Inventing international students: Exploring discourses in international student policy talk, 1945–75. Historical Studies in Education/Revue d’histoire de l’éducation, 28(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
  32. McGee, E. O., & Stovall, D. (2015). Reimagining critical race theory in education: Mental health, healing, and the pathway to liberatory praxis. Educational Theory, 65(5), 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. NAFSA Association of International Educators. (2007). Why America needs an international education policy. Washington, DC: NAFSA Association of International Educators.Google Scholar
  34. Nyland, C., Forbes-Mewett, H., & Marginson, S. (2010). The international student safety debate: Moving beyond denial. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Connor, S. (2017). Problematising strategic internationalisation: Tensions and conflicts between international student recruitment and integration policy in Ireland. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16, 1–14.Google Scholar
  36. Paltridge, T., Mayson, S., & Schapper, J. (2014). Welcome and exclusion: An analysis of The Australian newspaper’s coverage of international students. Higher Education, 68(1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Placier, M., Hall, P. M., McKendall, S. B., & Cockrell, K. S. (2000). Policy as the transformation of intentions: Making multicultural education policy. Educational Policy, 14(2), 259–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ricken, N. (2006). The power of power—Questions to Michel Foucault. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sá, C. M., & Sabzalieva, E. (2018). The politics of the great brain race: Public policy and international student recruitment in Australia, Canada, England and the USA. Higher Education, 75(2), 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schartner, A., & Cho, Y. (2017). ‘Empty signifiers’ and ‘dreamy ideals’: Perceptions of the ‘international university’ among higher education students and staff at a British university. Higher Education, 74(3), 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Seeber, M., Cattaneo, M., Huisman, J., & Paleari, S. (2016). Why do higher education institutions internationalize? An investigation of the multilevel determinants of internationalization rationales. Higher Education, 72(5), 685–702.Google Scholar
  42. Spencer-Oatey, H., & Dauber, D. (2015). How internationalised is your university? UKCISA Occasional Paper. Accessed on 26 June 2016. Retrieved from–schools/Publications–research/resources/84/How-internationalised-is-your-university.
  43. Spiro, J. (2014). Learning interconnectedness: Internationalisation through engagement with one another. Higher Education Quarterly, 68(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor, S. (2004). Researching educational policy and change in ‘new times’: Using critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Teichler, U. (2004). The changing debate on internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 48(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomson, P., Hall, C., & Jones, K. (2013). Towards educational change leadership as a discursive practice—Or should all school leaders read Foucault? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(2), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Usher, A. (2016). A new logo for Canadian higher education. Accessed on 4 July 2018. Retrieved from
  48. Walker, P. (2014). International student policies in UK higher education from colonialism to the coalition: Developments and consequences. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(4), 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Young, R. (Ed.). (1987). Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  50. Zembylas, M. (2005). Discursive practices, genealogies, and emotional rules: A poststructuralist view on emotion and identity in teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 21(8), 935–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Science and Public PolicyKeele UniversityKeeleUK

Personalised recommendations