Skip to main content

How Social Media Can Afford Engagement Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 341))

Abstract

The increasing popularity of social media has led many organizations to find new ways of customer engagement. This paper presents an initial pilot study to explore the affordance of social media in engagement processes. By applying the affordance theory and Porter’s process for engagement model, we used a case study approach to examine the case company’s Facebook and Twitter content to identify the engagement possibilities of social media. Our preliminary results show that social media opens a new channel for organisations to engage with their customers. We present a preliminary theoretical model to understand the how the functional affordances of social media are socialised in engagement processes, which ultimately gives rise to socialised affordances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Noguti, V.: Post language and user engagement in online content communities. Eur. J. Mark. 50(5/6), 695–723 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ibrahim, N.F., Wang, X., Bourne, H.: Exploring the effect of user engagement in online brand communities: evidence from Twitter. Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 321–338 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, J., Broderick, A.J., Lee, N.: Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network. J. Interact. Mark. 21(3), 2–20 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gensler, S., et al.: Managing brands in the social media environment. J. Interact. Mark. 27(4), 242–256 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gallaugher, J., Ransbotham, S.: Social media and customer dialog management at Starbucks. MIS Q. Exec. 9(4), 197–212 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hennig-Thurau, T., Wiertz, C., Feldhaus, F.: Does Twitter matter? The impact of microblogging word of mouth on consumers’ adoption of new movies. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(3), 375–394 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mollen, A., Wilson, H.: Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. J. Bus. Res. 63(9–10), 919–925 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, Y.-M., Lin, C.-H., Lai, C.-Y.: Identifying influential reviewers for word-of-mouth marketing. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 9(4), 294–304 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamilton, K., Alexander, M.: Organic community tourism: a cocreated approach. Ann. Tour. Res. 42, 169–190 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R.E., Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting and Knowing, pp. 67–82. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Habibi, M.R., Laroche, M., Richard, M.-O.: The roles of brand community and community engagement in building brand trust on social media. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37, 152–161 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Popp, B., Woratschek, H.: Introducing branded communities in sport for building strong brand relations in social media. Sport Manag. Rev. 19(2), 183–197 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brownstein, M.: Overreliance on social media will damage your brand. Adage (2010). http://adage.com/article/small-agency-diary/overreliance-social-media-damage-brand/143779/. Accessed 17 July 2017

  14. Hudson, S., et al.: The influence of social media interactions on consumer–brand relationships: a three-country study of brand perceptions and marketing behaviors. Int. J. Res. Mark. 33(1), 27–41 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Looy, A.: Social Media Management. STBE. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21990-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Naaman, M., Boase, J., Lai, C.-H.: Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lovejoy, K., Saxton, G.D.: Information, community, and action: how nonprofit organizations use social media. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 17(3), 337–353 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harder, A., Howard, V., Sedo, D.R.: Creating cohesive community through shared reading: a case study of One Book Nova Scotia. Can. J. Libr. Inf. Pract. Res. 10(1), 1–21 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hutchby, I.: Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35(2), 441–456 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng, Y., Yu, A.: Affordances of social media in collective action: the case of Free Lunch for Children in China. Inf. Syst. J. 26(3), 289–313 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Markus, M.L., Silver, M.S.: A foundation for the study of IT effects: a new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9(10/11), 609–632 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leonardi, P.M.: When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Q. 35(1), 147–167 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Treem, J.W., Leonardi, P.M.: Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 36(1), 143–189 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Majchrzak, A., Lynne Markus, M.: Encyclopedia of Management Theory: Technology Affordances and Constraints Theory (of MIS), pp. 832–836. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. McKenna, B., Myers, M.D., Newman, M.: Social media in qualitative research: challenges and recommendations. Inf. Organ. 27(2), 87–99 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Agostini, J.-M.: The case for direct questions on reading habits. J. Advert. Res. 2, 28–33 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Porter, C.E., et al.: How to foster and sustain engagement in virtual communities. Calif. Manag. Rev. 53(4), 80–110 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. van Weezel, A., Benavides, C.: How to engage the audience? A study on using Twitter to engage newspaper readers. In: Friedrichsen, M., Mühl-Benninghaus, W. (eds.) Handbook of Social Media Management. MEDIA, pp. 703–713. Springer, Berlin (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28897-5_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin, J., Ryaboy, D.: Scaling big data mining infrastructure: the Twitter experience. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newslett. 14(2), 6–19 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tuten, T.L.: Advertising 2.0: Social Media Marketing in a Web 2.0 World. Praeger, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mangold, W.G., Faulds, D.J.: Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Bus. Horiz. 52(4), 357–365 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vollmer, C., Precourt, G.: Always on: Advertising, Marketing, and Media in an Era of Consumer Control (Strategy + Business). McGraw-Hill, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Culnan, M.J., McHugh, P.J., Zubillaga, J.I.: How large US companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Q. Exec. 9(4), 243–259 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ashley, C., Tuten, T.: Creative strategies in social media marketing: an exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychol. Mark. 32(1), 15–27 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gruzd, A., Haythornthwaite, C.: Enabling community through social media. J. Med. Internet Res. 15(10), 248 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gruzd, A., Mai, P., Kampen, A.: A how-to for using Netlytic to collect and analyze social media data: a case study of the use of Twitter during the 2014 Euromaidan Revolution in Ukraine. In: Sloan, L., Quan-Haase, A. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods, pp. 513–529. SAGE, Los Angeles (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wei, W., Miao, L., Huang, Z.J.: Customer engagement behaviors and hotel responses. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 33, 316–330 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cabiddu, F., de Carlo, M., Piccoli, G.: Social media affordances: enabling customer engagement. Ann. Tour. Res. 48, 175–192 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bryman, A., Bell, E.: Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brad McKenna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zeng, X., McKenna, B., Richter, S., Cai, W. (2019). How Social Media Can Afford Engagement Processes. In: Themistocleous, M., Rupino da Cunha, P. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 341. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11395-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11395-7_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11394-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11395-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics