Skip to main content

Imaging of the Aorta

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1097 Accesses

Abstract

Significant advances in imaging techniques over the past decade have expanded the ability to noninvasively diagnose, monitor, and plan interventions for a variety of aortic pathologies. While established imaging techniques such as TTE and TEE continue to play an important role in imaging of the aorta, highly sensitive and specific modalities such as CT and MRI are playing an expanding role and are invaluable tools for the diagnosis and management of aortic diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mongeon F, Marcotte F, Terrone DG. Multimodality noninvasive imaging of thoracic aortic aneurysms: time to standardize? Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(1):48–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(14):e27–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Von Kodolitsch Y, Nienaber CA, Dieckmann C, Schwartz AG, et al. Chest radiography for the diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome. Am J Med. 2004;116(2):73–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Iiijima K, Hashimoto H, Hashimoto M, et al. Aortic Arch calcification detectable on chest x-ray is a strong independent predictor of cardiovascular events beyond traditional risk factors. Atherosclerosis. 2010;210(1):137–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hashimoto H, Iijima K, Hashimoto M, Son BK, Ota H, Ogawa S, Eto M, Akishita M, Ouchi Y. Validity and usefulness of aortic arch calcification in chest X-ray. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2009;16(3):256–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bannas P, Jung C, Blanke P, Treszl A, Derlin T, Adam G, Bley TA. Severe aortic arch calcification depicted on chest radiography strongly suggests coronary artery calcification. Eur J Radiol. 2013;23(10):2652–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Quader N, editor. The Washington manual of echocardiography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lang RM, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1–39.e14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Evangelista A, Flachskampf F, Erbel R, et al. Echocardiography in aortic diseases: EAE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:645–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oh JK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ, editors. The Echo manual. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileua C, et al. The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases of the European Society of Cardiology. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hahn RT, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:921–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patil TA, Nierich A. Transesophageal echocardiography evaluation of the thoracic aorta. Ann Card Anaesth. 2016;19(Supplement):S44–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Zaane B, Nierich AP, Buhre WF, Brandon Bravo Bruinsma GJ, Moons KG. Resolving the blind spot of transesophageal echocardiography: a new diagnostic device for visualizing the ascending aorta in cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98(4):434–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katz ES, Tunick PA, Rusinek H, Ribakove G, Spencer FC, Kronzon I. Protruding aortic atheromas predict stroke risk in elderly patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: experience with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20(1):70–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mussa FF, Horton JD, Moridzadeh, et al. Acute aortic dissection and intramural hematoma: a systematic review. JAMA. 2016;316(7):754–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. LeFevre ML, US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(4):281–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Svensjo S, Bjorck M, Wanhainen A. Update on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a topical review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48(6):659–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cosford PA, Leng GC. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2:CD002945.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rubenthaler J, Reiser M, Clevert DA. Diagnostic vascular ultrasound with the help of color Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Ultrasonography. 2016;35(4):289–301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Royse AG, Royse CF. Epiaortic ultrasound assessment of the aorta in cardiac surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009;23(3):335–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jansen Klomp WW, Brandon Bravo Bruinsma GJ, van’t Hof AW, Grandjean JG, Nierich AP. Imaging techniques for diagnosis of thoracic aortic atherosclerosis. Int J Vasc Med. 2016;2016:4726094.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. de Cilis E, Dachille A, Giardinelli F, Acquaviva T, Bortone AS. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound evaluation for the assessment of native valve measures in patients undergoing TAVI: preliminary results. Surg Technol Int. 2016;XXIX:201–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Janosi RA, Gorla R, Rogmann K, Kahlert P, Tsagakis K, Dohle DS, et al. Validation of intravascular ultrasound for measurement of aortic diameters: comparison with multi-detector computed tomography. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24(5):289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shi Y, Tsai PI, Wall MJ, Gilani R. Intravascular ultrasound enhanced aortic sizing for endovascular treatment of blunt aortic injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(5):817–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stavropoulos SW, Charagundla SR. Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Radiology. 2007;243(3):641–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wolak A, et al. Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: Normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2008;1(2):200–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nagpal P, Khandelwal A, Saboo SS, Bathla G, Steigner ML, Rybicki FJ. Modern imaging techniques: applications in the management of acute aortic pathologies. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91:449–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bitar R, Leung G, Perng R, et al. MR pulse sequences: what every radiologist wants to know but is afraid to ask. Radiographics. 2006;26:513–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kawel-Boehm N, Maceira A, Valsangiacomo-Buechel ER, et al. Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17:29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Davis A, Lewandowski A, Holloway C, et al. Observational study of regional aortic size referenced to body size: production of a cardiovascular magnetic resonance nomogram. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Eikendal AL, Bots ML, Haaring C, et al. Reference values for cardiac and aortic magnetic resonance imaging in healthy, young Caucasian adults. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164480.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Vasilios Vasilopoulos, AA, AAS, R.T.(R) (3D Technologist, Radiology, Loyola Medical Center) for assistance with image formatting and 3D reconstruction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ball, C.A., Rabbat, M.G. (2019). Imaging of the Aorta. In: Dieter, R., Dieter Jr., R., Dieter III, R. (eds) Diseases of the Aorta . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11322-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11322-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11321-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11322-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics