Abstract
In many respects, electronic literature is about lines of sight. It is amorphous and transient, almost Fluxus. Depending on your line of sight—the gateway with which you choose to enter a work, be that form or content—your reception of a piece will be altered accordingly. Lines of sight are also context dependent: our cognition, our appreciation of technical systems, these are all connected to notions of the posthuman. As electronic literature continues to define itself and find a place in the catalogue of conduits through which human beings tell their stories and express their creativity, it will be continuously reenvisioned as a result of its malleability, the potential for different critics and practitioners to view it through a variety of different lenses. This is, of course, an inherently literary phenomenon, but the presence of the digital adds a new complication: you cannot simply say that you are focused on the content, as in doing so, you are discounting aspects which are as beautiful and sublime as they are materially and symbolically complex. There is validity in taking the literary line of sight, but only if your reception is tempered with an appreciation of the cinematic experience, the visual design, and the underlying computational structures. There can never be a critical language for electronic literature, only an awareness of many critical languages. We will only ever be working towards a digital poetics, because there is no one digital.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aarseth, Espen J. 1997. Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Barthes, Roland. 1998. The Pleasure of the Text. Translated by Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.
Călinescu, Matei. 1987. Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-Garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Derrida, Jacques. 1992. ‘This Strange Institution Called Literature: An Interview with Jacques Derrida’. In Acts of Literature, edited by Derek Attridge. London: Routledge.
Emerson, Lori. 2014. Reading Writing Interfaces: From the Digital to the Bookbound. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Garbe, Jacob. 2015. ‘A Brief Chat with Digital Artist, Jacob Garbe Interview by James O’Sullivan’. http://josullivan.org/a-brief-chat-with-digital-artist-jacob-garbe/.
Krystal, Arthur. 2014. ‘What Is Literature? In Defense of the Canon’. Harper’s Magazine, March. http://harpers.org/archive/2014/03/what-is-literature/.
Montfort, Nick. 2005. Twisty Little Passages: An Approach to Interactive Fiction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williams, Raymond. 2009. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Sullivan, J. (2019). Towards a Digital Poetics. In: Towards a Digital Poetics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11310-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11310-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11309-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11310-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)