Skip to main content

Person-Centered Care and Care Planning for Those with MNCD

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Neurocognitive Behavioral Disorders

Abstract

Assisting professionals to care for those with major neurocognitive disorders (MNCD), including the inevitable neuropsychiatric symptoms, using the person-centered philosophy is the goal of this text. After a review of the history of person-centered care planning, a model to assess/evaluate a person’s behavioral communications is presented. The viewpoint for all care starts with a strength-based assessment of the person living with dementia. The framework makes use of the supported decision-making paradigm. After assessment, there is a review about choosing and applying person-centered interventions using regular monitoring of outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brooker D. What is person-centred care in dementia? Rev Clin Gerontol. 2003;13(3):215–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchanan RW, Kreyenbuhl J, Kelly DL, Noel JM, Boggs DL, Fischer BA, Himelhoch S, Fang B, Peterson E, Aquino PR, Keller W, Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT). The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychopharmacological treatment recommendations and summary statements. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36(1):71–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp116.. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Callahan CM, Sachs GA, Lamantia MA, Unroe KT, Arling G, Boustani MA. Redesigning systems of care for older adults with Alzheimer’s disease. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(4):626–32. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai L, Huang J. Schizophrenia and risk of dementia: a meta-analysis study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;14:2047–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chenoweth L, King MT, Jeon YH, Brodaty H, Stein-Parbury J, Norman R, et al. Caring for Aged Dementia Care Resident Study (CADRES) of person-centred care, dementia-care mapping, and usual care in dementia: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(4):317–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brodaty H, Arasaratnam C. Meta-analysis of nonpharmacological interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169(9):946–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen-Mansfield J, Jensen B, Resnick B, Norris M. Knowledge of and attitudes toward nonpharmacological interventions for treatment of behavior symptoms associated with dementia: a comparison of physicians, psychologists, and nurse practitioners. Gerontologist. 2012;52(1):34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper C, Mukadam N, Katona C, Lyketsos CG, Ames D, Rabins P, et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life of people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;1(1):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Da Silva J, Goncalves-Pereria M, Xavier M, Mukaetova-Ladinska E. Affective disorders and risk of developing dementia: systemic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;202(3):177–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Edvardsson D, Fetherstonhaugh D, Nay R. Promoting a continuation of self and normality: person-centred care as described by people with dementia, their family members and aged care staff. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(17-18):2611–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kverno KS, Black BS, Nolan MT, Rabins PV. Research on treating neuropsychiatric symptoms of advanced dementia with non-pharmacological strategies, 1998-2008: a systematic literature review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(5):825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Molony SL, Kolanowski A, Van Haitsma K, Rooney KE. Person-centered assessment and care planning. Gerontologist. 2018;58(suppl_1):S32–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nolan MR, Davies S, Brown J, Keady J, Nolan J. Beyond ‘person-centred’ care: a new vision for gerontological nursing. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13:45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Phinney A. Family strategies for supporting involvement in meaningful activity by persons with dementia. J Fam Nurs. 2006;12(1):80–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Phinney A, Chaudhury H, O’connor DL. Doing as much as I can do: the meaning of activity for people with dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2007;11(4):384–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roland KP, Chappell NL. Meaningful activity for persons with dementia: family caregiver perspectives. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015;30(6):559–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Velotti P, Garofalo C, Bottazzi F, Caretti V. Faces of shame: implications for self-esteem, emotion regulation, aggression, and Well-being. J Psychol. 2017;151(2):171–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2016.1248809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams R. Anger as a basic emotion and its role in personality building and pathological growth: the Neuroscientific, developmental and clinical perspectives. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1950. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01950.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nash M, Swantek SS. Neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: monotherapy, or combination therapy? Curr Psychiatr Ther. 2018;17(7):21–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spijker A, Vernooij-Dassen M, Vasse E, Adang E, Wollersheim H, Grol R, Verhey F. Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in delaying the institutionalization of patients with dementia: a meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(6):1116–28.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Doody RS, Stevens JC, Beck C, Dubinsky RM, Kaye JA, Gwyther L, Mohs RC, Thal LJ, Whitehouse PJ, DeKosky ST, Cummings JL. Practice parameter: management of dementia (an evidence-based review): report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2001;56(9):1154–66.

    Google Scholar 

  22. O’Neil ME, Freeman M, Christensen V. Non-pharmacological interventions for behavioral symptoms of dementia: a systematic review of the evidence, VA-ESP Project# 05–22: 2011; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  23. AOTA. Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process (3rd Edition). Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68(Supplement_1):S1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah E. Foidel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A: Sample Interdisciplinary Care Plan

Background Information

Date of report: January 12, 2019 Client’s name or initials: AM

Date of birth: 6/24/1934, although patient is unable to report

Reason for care plan update: Change in condition – reassessments completed by all members of the team, now working on interdisciplinary care plan for AM

Profile

AM is an 84-year-old woman who has lived in a memory care facility for the last 3 years and has severe MNCD. AM is able to answer to her name but has decreased verbal generative fluency. She smiles and nods her head in greeting, but does not engage in conversations. She follows the housekeeping staff around during the day. Her family believes that AM enjoys watching cleaning when it is done well. They report similar behavior in AM’s younger years; she liked keeping the house clean when her children were young. She also liked to cook, but hasn’t done any cooking for the last 20 years.

Change in Condition

AM’s behavior began to change about 3 weeks ago. She frequently becomes distressed, screaming at staff and chasing people who come into her room. These episodes occur on an almost daily basis, typically in the late afternoon. She takes several hours to calm down when she becomes upset. She has lost 17 pounds in the last 4 months. No precipitating factors or changes at the memory care unit have been identified. Her daughter’s visit frequency is about the same.

Life factors influencing current condition

  • Per family, AM would not have described herself as a religious person.

  • Homemaker, kept a spotless house, was an excellent cook.

  • Liked getting her nails done, has not been able to sit for this in the past 6 months.

  • Loved to travel.

  • Husband was an artist.

  • One daughter is married with a grown child of her own, lives near the Memory Care Unit, and visits most days.

Assessments

Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Q form: score – severity 14, caregiver distress 18.

Aggression 3/4, depression 3/5, anxiety 3/5, irritability 2/3, eating 3/2

MSSE: score of 7 – not calm 1, screams 1, malnutrition 1, eating problem 1, invasive actions (CBG) 1, suffering according to medical opinion 1, suffering according to family 1

Domain

Goals of care/end-of-life issues: Now in a palliative care, comfort care track

AM perspective: “No pain” was the last conversation about this, which occurred approximately 2 years ago. She has not been able to verbally provide additional input, although she has been communicating distress with her behavior.

Daughter: Family supports a focus on comfort. They are unsure what might be causing AM’s current outbursts.

Interdisciplinary team: Focus is on keeping AM comfortable and minimizing pain. Consideration is being given to current increase in distress and whether it is related to pain. Team is pondering if AM has started the transition to the end of life and estimates the trajectory over the next 1–2 months. MSSE suggests life expectancy of 6 months or less. Referral to hospice services is recommended to AM and her family.

Participant perspective

Issues

Plan

Discipline

“No pain” was the last conversation about this, 2 years ago

GOC/palliative care philosophy of comfort

Patient to be kept comfortable and pain-free; if that becomes difficult, refer to hospice for more wrap-around care – now will increase medications and refer to hospice

PCP, RN, SW

“I want to be cremated” stated 5 years ago

Funeral plan

AM and her family have arrangement with XYZ Funeral Home. Copies of paperwork in chart at memory care, with daughter, and at PCP office

SW, housing director, daughter, PCP

Daughter reports “My mom is suffering”

NPS: Mini-Suffering State Exam Score

7/10

Problem solve as needed to support stable placement

Provide caregiver assistance with developing interventions

Continue to track MSSE, NPI-Q

MSW, RN

Screaming and pushing

NPS: NPI-Q score 14/18

Psychiatry collaborative consultation: recommends having daughter come at 3pm and lay down with her mother to see if “modeling how to rest” helps. Move AM away from the noise before it starts to increase around 3pm. Continue dementia-specific medications. Trial pain meds (low-dose opiate+bowel medications) while beginning behavioral interventions as she appears to be suffering greatly

PCP, consult with psychiatry

AM able to walk, able to eat finger-food

Functional status

Continues as expected. Support by walking regularly with AM, and provide food in line with her preferences

Staff at MCU, daughter, activity dir

Appears upset when medications are handed to her and when her CBG is checked

Medical:

HTN

DM

Discontinue all medications that are not being given for NPS

Discontinue CBGs. Encourage fluids as elevated CBG can lead to dehydration

PCP, RN

Daughter speaking for AM: MCU meets her mother’s needs

Living environment and safety

Continue MCU with added support from hospice staff

PCP, RN, MCU, hospice

After review of the care plan, all team members sign:

AM _________ Date ______ Dtr A ________ Date ______

SW_________ Date _____ RN __________ Date ______

Aide ________ Date ______ OT__________ Date ______

PCP ______ Date _____ Housekeeper_________ Date _____

MCU Dir ________ Date ____ Act Dir ________ Date _____

Outstanding actions:

SW and PCP will make hospice referral and send the first and current person-centered care plans. Hospice to consult with AM, Daughter, MCU staff, and rest of team.Date of referral:________Comments/Additions from AM or Dtr A:________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Appendix B: Sample Care Plan Chapter 9

Background Information

Date of report: September 21, 2019 Client’s name or initials: BN

Date of birth: April 10, 1940

Reason for care plan update: Regular reassessments completed by all members of the team, now working on interdisciplinary care plan for BN.

Profile

BN is a 79-year-old woman who has lived in assisted living facility for the last 3 years and has mild MNCD. BN is able to have conversations. She enjoys talking, reading, and playing cards. She loses track of conversations at times and has limited recall. Notes don’t seem to help much.

  • Roman Catholic background. Attends mass on Sundays.

  • Librarian, loves to read, is in a book club at ALF.

  • Likes getting her hair done.

  • Loved to travel.

  • Husband was a civil servant.

  • No children. Niece lives in a distant state but calls BN once per month.

Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Q form: severity 2, caregiver distress 2

Anxiety 1/1, irritability 1/1

MSSE: 1/10 dialysis

BN’s perceptions: Things seem good right now. Lots of minor medical issues, but living here has been good for me. I have a whole new group of friends. The food is pretty good too.

Domain: End-of-life issues – now in a palliative care, functional focus track

BN perspective: “As long as I can keep going and enjoy time with friends, life is good.”

Other interdisciplinary team members – continue to support optimal quality of life. Life expectancy is less than 5 years. DNR is in place. If benefits of an intervention are less than risk over next 5 years, advise against them.

Participant perspective

Issues

Plan

Discipline

I don’t want CPR; I saw that happen to my best friend, and it was awful

GOC: Focus on daily functioning palliative care philosophy

Encourage BN to be as active as possible; her “use it or lose it” attitude is lifelong

RN, ALF act dir, aides

“I want to be cremated” stated 5 years ago

Funeral plan

Copies of paperwork in chart, with daughter and at PCP office

Housing director, PCP

Denies suffering

Mini-Suffering State Exam Score

1/ 10

Problem solve as needed to support functioning

Provide caregiver education regarding end of life as needed

MSW, RN

Some anxiety during dialysis

NPI-Q score 1/2

Encourage listening to music and watching distracting movies during dialysis. Discuss when it may be time to stop due to not supporting a good quality of life, and document those discussions

Kidney team, PCP

Domain: Cognition/functioning

BN perspective: “I lose track of some things, I need the staff help, life is good.”

Other interdisciplinary team members – Allen cognitive level 4.6 mild-moderate functional impairment. Strengths are ability to scan the environment and utilize objects if they are visible.

Participant perspective

Issues

Plan

Discipline

I need reminders

Does not track dialysis days any longer, benefits from invitation to activities

Staff to come and get her for medical and dialysis appointments, invite to all activities, and keep track of her schedule for her

Aides, ALF RN, and manager to monitor

Domain: Emotional/neuropsychiatric symptoms

BN perspective: I get nervous sometimes. I am not depressed. I enjoy being as active as I can.

Other interdisciplinary team members – the emotional impact of dialysis is emerging as an area to attend to closely. At some point, if it causes too much distress, will need to discuss stopping dialysis.

figure a

Domain: Medical

BN perspective: I can tolerate dialysis for now. Maybe not for too much longer. Otherwise, I don’t think I have medical problems.

Other interdisciplinary team members – continue much of current care. Frank conversation now with BN and her niece and the PCP about the future of stopping dialysis. Begin to plan for that. Send documentation of care plan to nephrologist and offer to have joint meeting with PCP, BN, and niece by phone with nephrologist.

Participant perspective

Issues

Plan

Discipline

7 years ago, completed

Advanced directive

Participant named niece her primary healthcare power of attorney, she does not have an alternate

PCP

“I get tired a lot”

End-stage renal disease on hemodialysis – secondary hyperparathyroidism and anemia

CPAP at night

History of low protein levels

Continue Sensipar and sevelamer

Check labs prn

Increase daily water intake

Renal follow-up per schedule

Lab draws/blood pressure checks left arm only

Draw labs as ordered

Hemodialysis three times a week

Communicate with XXX Kidney Center to reschedule run when participant has missed run

Make sure settings are correct every night and put away every morning

Encourage compliance

Replace respiratory care supplies per replacement schedule

Renal diet: participant has been educated on renal diet guidelines

Small portions of meals as she desires

Nutrition supplement

Weigh at ALF once a month, and send to PCP and nephrologist

PCP

RN

Care aide

RN

Domain: Living environment/safety

BN perspective: I really like living here. I have friends and enjoy activities.

Other interdisciplinary team members – At the current time, BN’s needs are being met well here. Continue to focus on maximizing ability to be as independent as possible.

Participant perspective

Issues

Plan

Discipline

I love to read

Active in book club

Continue to encourage to read, especially well-loved books BN is familiar with

Activity director

My eyes get tired when I read

Decreased visual acuity

Provide large print books and magnification device

Occupational therapist

I sometimes forget when book club is; I would hate to miss it

Decreased short-term memory

Provide environmental cues to remind BN of schedule; large digit clock with alarm

Reminds 10 minutes before group starts

Occupational therapist;

activity director

After review of the care plan, all team members sign:

BN _________ Date _______ Niece ________ Date _______

SW_________ Date _______RN __________ Date _______

Aide ________ Date ______ OT__________ Date ______

PCP _________ Date _____ Act Dir ________ Date _____

Housing Coordinator____________ Date _______Outstanding actions:Send copy of Person Centered Care Plan to Nephrologist officeDr. _____________ Date_________Comments/Additions from BN or Niece:________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Foidel, S.E., Nash, M.C., Rose, S.S. (2019). Person-Centered Care and Care Planning for Those with MNCD. In: Nash, M., Foidel, S. (eds) Neurocognitive Behavioral Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11268-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11268-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11267-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11268-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics