Skip to main content

Strength-Based Person-Centered Dementia Care: Activities of Daily Living

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1024 Accesses

Abstract

Given the complex framework described throughout this text, it is helpful to see examples applying the outlined principles. This chapter is an extended illustration of an interdisciplinary team using strength-based and person-centered care for a person living with dementia. Completing activities of daily living (ADLs) is one of the most challenging, yet important, tasks that occurs multiple times per day for those with advanced dementia. Decreased ability to complete activities of daily living (ADLS) is a hallmark of major neurocognitive disorder (NCD).

According to the DSM-5, loss of function in daily activities is a main indicator of the transition from minor to major NCD. By completing and documenting a strength-based assessment, a person-centered care plan for ADL completion can be developed for those living with dementia. Specific strategies for feeding, hygiene, dressing, and bathing need to be matched to the skills of an individual living with dementia. This chapter will outline specific strategies, isolate impairments, and emphasize a strength-based approach to person-centered ADL completion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmed RM, Latheef S, Bartley L, Irish M, Halliday GM, Kiernan MC, Hodges JR, Piguet O. Eating behavior in frontotemporal dementia: peripheral hormones vs hypothalamic pathology. Neurology. 2015;85(15):1310–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cummings JL. The neuropsychiatric inventory assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology. 1997;48(5 Suppl 6):10S–6S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ikeda M, Brown J, Holland AJ, Fukuhara R, Hodges JR. Changes in appetite, food preference, and eating habits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(4):371–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gutman SA. Quick reference neuroscience for rehabilitation professionals: the essential neurologic principles underlying rehabilitation practice: Slack Incorporated; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hanssen I, Kuven BM. Moments of joy and delight: the meaning of traditional food in dementia care. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(5–6):866–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin L, Watson R, Wu S. What is associated with low food intake in older people with dementia? J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:53–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02962.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan DG, Cammer A, Stewart NJ, Crossley M, D’Arcy C, Forbes DA, Karunanayake C. Nursing aide reports of combative behavior by residents with dementia: results from a detailed prospective incident diary. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(3):220–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Bibliography

  • Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dementia J Alzheimer’s Assoc. 2012;8:131–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker R, Holloway J, Holtkamp C, Larsson A, Hartman LC, Pearce R, et al. Effects of multi-sensory stimulation for people with dementia. J Adv Nurs. 2003;43(5):465–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bate H. Ensuring quality of life for people with severe dementia. Nurs Residential Care. 2013;15(3):157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bédard A, Landreville P, Voyer P, Verreault R, Vézina J. Reducing verbal agitation in people with dementia: evaluation of an intervention based on the satisfaction of basic needs. Aging Ment Health. 2011;15(7):855–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodaty H, Arasaratnam C. Meta-analysis of nonpharmacological interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169(9):946–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Mansfield J, Jensen B, Resnick B, Norris M. Knowledge of and attitudes toward nonpharmacological interventions for treatment of behavior symptoms associated with dementia: a comparison of physicians, psychologists, and nurse practitioners. Gerontologist. 2012;52(1):34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran M. Neurocognitive disorder NCD: interventions to support occupational performance: AOTA Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper C, Mukadam N, Katona C, Lyketsos CG, Ames D, Rabins P, et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life of people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;1(1):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai AK, Schwartz L, Grossberg GT. Behavioral disturbance in dementia. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2012:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doody RS, Stevens JC, Beck C, Dubinsky RM, Kaye JA, Gwyther LMSW, et al. Practice parameter: management of dementia (an evidence-based review) report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2001;56(9):1154–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley NR, Hinojosa J. Improving quality of life for persons with Alzheimer’s disease and their family caregivers: brief occupational therapy intervention. Am J Occup Ther. 2004;58(5):561–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier S, Cummings J, Ballard C, Brodaty H, Grossberg G, Robert P, Lyketsos C. Management of behavioral problems in Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010;22(3):346–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin LN, Winter L, Dennis MP, Hodgson N, Hauck WW. Targeting and managing behavioral symptoms in individuals with dementia: a randomized trial of a nonpharmacological intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:1465–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammar LM, Emami A, Götell E, Engström G. The impact of caregivers’ singing on expressions of emotion and resistance during morning care situations in persons with dementia: an intervention in dementia care. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(7–8):969–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husebo BS, Ballard C, Sandvik R, Nilsen OB, Aarsland D. Efficacy of treating pain to reduce behavioral disturbances in residents of nursing homes with dementia: cluster randomized clinical trial. Br Med J. 2011:343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan A, Hughes J, Pakresi M, Hepburn S, O’Brien JT. The utility of PAINAD in assessing pain in a UK population with severe dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;26(2):118–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Chang M, Rose K, Kim S. Predictors of caregiver burden in caregivers of individuals with dementia. J Adv Nurs. 2011;68(4):846–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp B, Rösser N, Tabeling S, Stürenburg HJ, de Haan B, Karnath HO, Wessel K. Errors on the trail making test are associated with right hemispheric frontal lobe damage in stroke patients. Behav Neurol. 2015;2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Kverno KS, Black BS, Nolan MT, Rabins PV. Research on treating neuropsychiatric symptoms of advanced dementia with non-pharmacological strategies, 1998-2008: a systematic literature review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(5):825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kverno KS, Rabins PV, Blass DM, Hicks K, Black BS. Prevalence and treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in hospice-eligible nursing home residents with advanced dementia. J Gerontol Nurs. 2008;34(12):8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leveille SG, Jones RN, Hausdorff JM, McLean R, Kiely DK, Gagnon M, Milberg WP. Measuring attention in very old adults using the test of everyday attention. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2017;24(5):543–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letts L, Edwards M, Berenyi J, Moros K, O’Neill C, O’Toole C, McGrath C. Using occupations to improve quality of life, health and wellness, and client and caregiver satisfaction for people with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(5):497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston G, Johnston K, Katona C, Paton J, Lyketsos CG. Systematic review of psychological approaches to the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(11):1996–2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2011;7(3):263–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olazarán J, Reisberg B, Clare L, Cruz I, Peña-Casanova J, del Ser T, et al. Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review of efficacy. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30(2):161–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil ME, Freeman M, Christensen V, Telerant R, Addleman A, Kansagara D. Non-pharmacological interventions for behavioral symptoms of dementia: a systematic review of the evidence. VA-ESP Project# 05–22. 2012;

    Google Scholar 

  • Robnett RH, Brossie N, Chopp W. Gerontology for the healthcare professional. 4th ed: Jones & Bartlett; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieper M, Achterberg W, Francke A, van der Steen J, Scherder E, Kovach C. The implementation of the serial trial intervention for pain and challenging behaviour in advanced dementia patients (STA OP!): a clustered randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11(1):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabins PV, Blacker D, Rovner BW, Rummans T, Schneider LS, Tariot PN, et al. American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Am J Psychiatr. 2007;164(12 Suppl):5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robichaud L, Hébert R, Desrosiers J. Efficacy of a sensory integration program on behaviors of inpatients with dementia. Am J Occup Ther. 1994;48(4):355–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodakowski J, Reynolds CF III, Lopez OL, Butters MA, Dew MA, Skidmore ER. Developing a non-pharmacological intervention for individuals with mild cognitive impairment. J Appl Gerontol. 2018;37(5):665–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson MR, Kovach CR, Stetzer F. Predictors of nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments stopped and started among nursing home residents with dementia. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2012;5(2):130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman SA. Quick reference neuroscience for rehabilitation professionals: SLACK Inc; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spijker A, Vernooij-Dassen M, Vasse E, Adang E, Wollersheim H, Grol R, Verhey F. Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in delaying the institutionalization of patients with dementia: a meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(6):1116–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesson J, Clemson L, Brodaty H, Reppermund S. Estimating functional cognition in older adults using observational assessments of task performance in complex everyday activities: a systematic review and evaluation of measurement properties. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:335–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tappen RM, Roach KE, Applegate EB, Stowell P. Effect of a combined walking and conversation intervention on functional mobility of nursing home residents with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2000;14(4):196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zoltan B. Vision, perception, and cognition: a manual for the evaluation and treatment of the adult with acquired brain injury. 4th ed: Slack Inc; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah E. Foidel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A: Occupational Therapy Individualized Care Plan Report

Occupational Therapy Individualized Care Plan Report

Background Information

Date of report: Client’s name or initials:

Date of birth:

Therapists:

Reason for referral:

Occupational profile:

Individual and/or caregiver report of decreased occupational performance (self-reported goals):

Assessments performed:

Findings and analysis (fill out the table below for summary of current occupational engagement):

figure a

Interpretation :

Areas of occupation (strengths and challenges):

Behavioral/emotional concerns based on evaluation:

Priorities for intervention (at least three priorities):

Plan :

figure b

Specific client-centered activity recommendations:

figure c

Specific ADL recommendations:

Specific communication recommendations (give suggestions to staff and caregivers to support care of client):

Recommend reassessment of resident (timeline):

_____________________________ Date

Reviewed by OTR/L

Appendix B: Example Occupational Therapy Individualized Care Plan Report

Occupational Therapy Individualized Care Plan Report

Background Information

Date of report: N/A Client’s name or initials: XX

Date of birth: Patient unable to report

Therapists: OT

Reason for referral: Lack of engagement in meaningful occupations and difficulty transitioning.

Occupational profile:

XX is an older woman who lives in an assisted living facility. She enjoys sitting on a couch in the lobby (close to the window) and is welcoming to others sitting next to her for company. XX reports she enjoys conversing with others and independently moves chairs to talk with other ladies sitting in the lobby. She notes how she will not be a great conversationalist, due to her memory. XX short-term memory is impaired, but she is aware of her memory struggles and sometimes calls herself “stupid” or “idiot.” One way she copes with this is by saying she doesn’t like to live on memories and does not like to dwell on the past.

The staff at Happy Care guide XX, everywhere. The activity director reported XX has a routine of staying in the lobby for most of the day, attending meals, and then calling her daughters in the evening once she is back in her room. As people walked by, she became confused as to who was who. She thought she saw her daughter and asked if one man was the pastor. XX easily loses track of her thoughts and has a hard time thinking of what she wants to say. She gets up numerous times a day to ask the front desk when the next meal is or what she is supposed to be doing, unsure if she is in the correct place. Some information we obtained about XX’s past includes:

  • Picked hops in Independence XXX with her brothers and went to an all-girls high school.

  • In the Air Force, she was a corporal in the Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps, and she was stationed in Newport News Virginia for a time.

  • Used to be a hairdresser.

  • Likes getting her nails done.

  • Loved drinking beer.

  • Husband was an artist.

  • She and her husband owned a Tavern in Oregon.

  • She has two daughters, one of which lives in Oregon.

Room environment:

  • Clear floors, with no tripping hazards.

  • Television with Christian sermon on.

  • Phone with raised numbers and high contrast to help with low vision.

  • Digital clock on her nightstand, along with a water bottle and flashlight.

  • Crossword books on multiple tables and shelves.

  • Books and a deck of cards on a shelf in her living room.

  • Pictures of loved ones on shelves.

  • Walk-in shower with grab bars and a shower chair (receives step-by-step directions for all self-care tasks).

  • Clothes are organized by type (i.e., short sleeve, long pant, etc.).

  • Bedtime clothes placed on a chest directly in front of her bed.

  • Many small objects in the cupboards, such as a headband, empty chip bag, and a wireless phone.

  • Fridge filled with Ensure and water.

  • Two types of signs inside room:

    1. 1.

      What she should not worry about – placed in four different places in her room and is a pink paper with all capitalized black lettering; includes waking up in the morning, call at 6:30 am from Marilyn or staff will get her up; paying bills, daughter takes care of finances; laundry and sheets; taken care of by Happy Care staff; and people at Happy Care take her to meals, exercise class, and entertainment.

    2. 2.

      Daily schedule in all capitalized black letters on white paper, stuck on her fridge.

Individual and/or caregiver report of decreased occupational performance: Lack of engagement in leisure activities and difficulty transitioning from one location to another.

Assessments performed: OT performed an occupational profile on XX and gathered information through interviewing XX, the activity director, and certified nursing assistants (CNA’s). Considering the degree of XX cognitive impairment, informal observations were used as XX engaged in various activities.

Findings and analysis

Areas of occupation

Level of independence (observed)

Level of independence (reported)

Reporter of information

Leisure

Max cognitive, verbal, and physical cues

Max cognitive, verbal, and physical cues

Activity director

ADL

Max cognitive, verbal, and physical cues

Max cognitive, verbal, and physical cues

CNA’s

IADL

Max cognitive, verbal, and physical cues

Max cognitive, verbal, and physical cues

CNA’s

Interpretation

Areas of Occupation

Strengths:

XX has an extensive history in many occupations, from living in the country where she helped grow and pick crops to entering the armed forces and later becoming a hairdresser, as well as a wife and mother. These occupations can be used to guide activity choices for XX to engage in. XX also enjoys being with others and wants to converse and participate with the right guidance and reassurance.

Challenges:

XX short-term memory is her biggest challenge. At this time, XX is aware of her declining memory and inability to think clearly. She is easily flustered and gives up, unsure of how to complete a task and concerned with doing tasks correctly.

Behavioral/emotional concerns based on evaluation: The anxiety and decrease in confidence due to XX’s awareness of her severe short-term memory loss are her most significant concerns.

Priorities for intervention:

  1. 1.

    Task transition

  2. 2.

    Leisure engagement

  3. 3.

    Sustained independence in ADLs and IADLs

Plan :

Targeted area of occupation

Baseline supports needed

Observable behavior to watch for when person is experiencing poor performance

Interventions to improve performance and decrease behavioral concerns

Transitions

Max cognitive, physical, and verbal cues

Saying she does not want to get up from couch and that she cannot do “blank” anymore

Starts stuttering and cannot get clear words out in response to your question or statement

Introduce yourself, sit down next to her, and then say she should come with you to go check out when lunch is or to see if there are cookies at the front desk

If this does not work, wait until she gets up on her own and say, “Let’s go check out when lunch is” and then when you see no one is in the cafeteria say, “Let’s go check out

___” or “Let’s go walk to

___”

Give her cues as you are walking, such as “We are going to the elevator” or “We are going to turn right”

Leisure

Max cognitive, physical, and verbal cues

Sitting in lobby: getting up and asking front desk about where to go or what to do; always asking about next meal; looking at her watch; asking if she should get into car outside; looking

at her key and stating room number; concerned

look on her face (furrowed brows)

One-on-one activities: Puts down/ takes out of hands and stops engaging; says she cannot do it because of hands (holding them up and looking at them)

In the lobby:

Have a table next to her with the following items:

1. Sign with her name, indicating the objects on the table are hers

2. Sign that indicates when next meal is (i.e., lunch

11:00 AM)

3. Picture that shows how to use nail file and nail cleaner with actual tools directly underneath it

4. Large font crossword puzzle book with one pencil directly next to it

During one-on-one activities:

1 step cues

Smiling, thumbs up, and touch back or shoulder when guiding her through hallways

Words of encouragement and affirmation, such as “You are doing a great job!” or “Thanks for being such a big help!”

ADLs

Max cognitive, physical, and verbal cues

Puts down/ takes out of hands and stops engaging; says she cannot do it because of hands (holding them up and looking at them).

Provide step-by-step verbal cues and demonstrate when needed

Encourage and reassure!

IADLs

Max cognitive, physical, and verbal cues

Same as above

Same as above

Specific client-centered activity recommendations

Activity

Environment support recommendations

Supplies needed

Frequency for activity

Exercise group

When she gets up around 10 am to ask when lunch is, go check out the lunchroom with her, but then say, “Let’s go check out the group activity” and guide her upstairs

Provide her a chair in the front row

and sit in a chair beside her to demonstrate, allowing her to imitate your movements. She will need encouragement (i.e., smiling, nodding, thumbs up) and minimal physical assistance in beginning more complicated movements, such as stretching arms across body

None (chair is located at class)

At least 3x per week

Shelling snap peas or peeling onions

Saying, “The kitchen could use some help with these,” demonstrate shelling one of the peas, and then hand one pea to her

Short, simple words of encouragement and affirmation, such as: “This is a huge help,” “Thank you for showing us,” and “I can tell you’ve done this before”

Grading down:

Peas: opening the peas for her, and then hand them over for her to put into a bowl

Onions: start peeling and then hand it to her to finish

Snap peas or onions and two small, brightly colored bowls

As often as possible: this

activity requires one-on-one cueing and encouragement

Cleaning underneath

fingernails and filing nails

“I know you like to do your nails. Here is a file (or a nail cleaner stick).” Demo how to use the tools (with her own nails), and then place the tool in her hand.

If she does not want to use them, set them next to her on the table for her to self-initiate later

Nail file and nail

cleaner (wooden)

Daily, while sitting on couch in the lobby

Sorting coins Similar activity to try: sorting silverware or colored buttons

Set up the bowl of coins directly in front of XX on the table and have the other bowls surrounding it Demonstrate what you would like her to do and then hand her a coin. Provide verbal and physical cues (i.e., encouragement, and pointing to the bowl with the coin she is searching for if she verbalizes she doesn’t know)

A variety of coins in a small

bowl

Four small, colored bowls to use as she separates the coins

As often as possible: this

activity requires one-on-one cueing and encouragement

Crossword puzzles

Place next to her on the table in the lobby. Let her know the book is hers as you set it down

Large font crossword puzzle book from her room

Daily, while sitting on couch in the lobby

*Having music playing in the lobby: XX’s foot was tapping, and she crossed her legs showing relaxation and comfort while sitting on the couch.

Specific ADL recommendations :

In the morning before she goes down to the lobby, make sure she has:

  1. 1.

    Watch on her wrist

  2. 2.

    Keys on her wrist

  3. 3.

    Glasses around her neck

  4. 4.

    A bottle of Ensure or water

Health literate signs: Colored pictures with minimal font (black letters, 14+ size) on white paper, in her bathroom and bedroom, outlining steps to get ready in the morning/night.

Specific communication recommendations:

  1. 1.

    One step cues; calming, short phrases of affirmation, comfort, and encouragement.

  2. 2.

    Hold her hand and/or touch her back or shoulder when speaking to her/guiding her from point A to point B.

  3. 3.

    Food is a motivator! Use that to transition her from one activity to the next.

Recommend reassessment of resident: Recommend reassessment in 4 weeks to follow up on ease of task transitions and level of occupational engagement.

_____________________________ Date

OT

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Foidel, S.E. (2019). Strength-Based Person-Centered Dementia Care: Activities of Daily Living. In: Nash, M., Foidel, S. (eds) Neurocognitive Behavioral Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11268-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11268-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11267-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11268-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics