Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of the Marginalized and Unusual Suspects in the Production of Digital Innovations: Models of Innovation in an African Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Locally Relevant ICT Research (IDIA 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 933))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of innovation concepts addressing experiences in the Global South raises crucial questions about the relevance of this phenomenon for development. In an effort to bring conceptual clarity, this paper reviews several related understandings of innovation and related approaches to, firstly, map overlaps and differences, and secondly, understand how they are situated within the development discourse. This study uses a literature review and applies thematic analysis in identifying the various innovation concepts, and the extent to which they include the marginalized in their framing and operationalization. In particular, this study evaluates whether these innovation concepts are framing innovation as something developed outside of poor communities but on behalf of them, whether innovation is designed alongside poor communities, or whether it is designed by and within poor communities. The findings of this study revealed that in most cases, these concepts are pro-poor, with very few exceptions of innovations done in collaboration with the poor, in a per-poor process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Global South is a term used to denote the “interconnected histories of colonialism, neo-imperialism, and differential economic and social change through which large inequalities in living standards, life expectancy, and access to resources are maintained” (Dados and Connell 2012).

  2. 2.

    Funding was provided by the UK Economic and Social Sciences Research Council, Grant Number ES/P006582/1.

  3. 3.

    http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/360021468187787070/A-global-count-of-the-extreme-poor-in-2012-data-issues-methodology-and-initial-results.

References

  1. Kraemer-Mbula, E., Wamae, W.: Innovation and the development agenda. OECD Publishing, Ottowa (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. African Union Commission: Agenda 2063 - The Africa We Want. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. UNIDO: Industrial Development Report 2016: The Role of Technology and Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. Vienna (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guth, M.: Innovation, social inclusion and coherent regional development: a new diamond for a socially inclusive innovation policy in regions. Eur. Plann. Stud. 13(2), 333–348 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Papaioannou, T.: How inclusive can innovation and development be in the twenty-first century? Innov. Dev. 4(2), 187–202 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. George, G., Mcgahan, A.M., Prabhu, J.: Innovation for inclusive growth: towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. J. Manage. Stud. 49(4), 661–683 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Foster, C., Heeks, R.: Conceptualising inclusive innovation: modifying systems of innovation frameworks to understand diffusion of new technology to low-income consumers. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 25(3), 333–355 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiménez, A., Yingqin, Z.: Tech hubs, innovation and development. Inf. Technol. Dev. 24(1), 95–118 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cozzens, S., Sutz, J.: Innovation in informal settings: a research agenda. Ottawa, Canada (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ramani, S.V., SadreGhazi, S., Duysters, G.: On the diffusion of toilets as bottom of the pyramid innovation: lessons from sanitation entrepreneurs. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 29(4), 676–687 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chataway, J., Hanlin, R., Kaplinsky, R.: Inclusive innovation: an architecture for policy development. Innov. Dev. 4(1), 33–54 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levidow, L., Papaioannou, T.: Which inclusive innovation? Competing normative assumptions around social justice. Innov. Dev. 1–18 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pansera, M.: Discourses of Innovation and Development: Insights from Ethnographic case studies in Bangladesh and India. University of Exeter (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pansera, M., Owen, R.: Framing inclusive innovation within the discourse of development: insights from case studies in India. Res. Policy 47(1), 23–34 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meagher, K.: Cannibalizing the informal economy: frugal innovation and economic inclusion in Africa. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 1–17 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heeks, R.: ICT4D 2.0: the next phase of applying ICT for international development. IEEE Comput. Soc. 41(6), 26–33 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kleine, D.: Technologies of Choice? ICTs, Development, and the Capabilities Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Kraemer-Mbula, E., Wunch-Vincent, E. (eds.): The Informal Economy in Develop-ing Nations: Hidden Engine of Innovation? New Economic Insights and Policies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fressoli, M., Arond, E., Abrol, D., Smith, A., Ely, A., Dias, R.: When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation. Innov. Dev. 4(2), 277–292 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mowat, J.G.: Towards a new conceptualisation of marginalisation. Eur. Educ. Res. J. 14(5), 454–476 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. OECD: Innovation and Inclusive Development: a discussion of the main policy issues. OECD Science, Technology & Industry working paper 2013/1. OECD Publishing (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Blake, M.K., Hanson, S.: Rethinking innovation: context and gender. Environ. Plan. 37(4), 681–701 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Codagnone, C. (ed.): Vienna Study on Inclusive Innovation for Growth and Cohesion. European Commission, Brussels (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vossenberg, S.: Gender-aware women’s entrepreneurship development for inclusive development in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53, 1689–1699 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Beede, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., Doms, M.: Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation, Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief 04–11, U.S. Dept of Commerce, Washington, DC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: Gender differences in use of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Q. 21(4), 389–400 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bhatti, Y., Ventresca, M.: How can ‘frugal innovation’ be conceptualized?. Soc. Sci. Res. Netw. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Altenburg, T., Lundvall, B.: Building inclusive innovation systems in developing countries: challenges for IS research. Handb. Innov. Syst. Dev. Ctries. Build. Domest. Capab. Glob. Setting 33–56 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Okoli, C., Schabram, K.: A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. In: Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, vol. 10 (26) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., Gassmann, O.: Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Res. Technol. Manag. 54(4), 38–45 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Prabhu, J.: Frugal innovation: doing more with less for more. Philos. Trans. R Soc. a-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 375(2095), 20160372 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Heeks, R., Foster, C., Nugroho, Y.: New models of inclusive innovation for development. Innov. Dev. 4(2), 175–185 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kumar, H., Bhaduri, S.: Jugaad to grassroot innovations: understanding the landscape of the informal sector innovations in India. African J. Sci. Technol. Innov. Dev. 6(1), 13–22 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, M., Gassmann, O.: Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Res. Manag. 54(4), 38–45 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kahle, N.H., Dubiel, A., Ernst, H., Prabhu, J.: The democratizing effects of frugal innovation: Implications for inclusive growth and state-building. J. Indian Bus. Res. 5(4), 220–234 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Heeks, R.: Information systems and developing countries: failure, success, and local improvisations. Inf. Soc. 18(2), 101–112 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Karamchandani, A., Kubzansky, M., Lalwani, N.: Is the bottom of the pyramid really for you? Harv. Bus. Rev. 89(3), 107–111 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  39. BRCK: Bridging the digital Divide. brck.org (2016). http://brck.org. Accessed 31 Jan 2018

  40. Bright, J.: Kenyan startup BRCK launches SupaBRCK device to solve Africa’s internet equation. https://techcrunch.com/2017/03/08/kenyan-startup-brck-launches-supabrck-device-to-solve-africas-internet-equation/. Accessed 31 Jan 2018

  41. Narsalay, R., Pongeluppe, L., Light, D.: The Hidden Pitfalls of Inclusive Innovation. Stanford Soc. Innov. Rev. 48–53 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Duncombe, R.: Facilitating change in agricultural value chains with app services. ICT Update, pp. 6–7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Solon, O.: MFarm empowers Kenya’s farmers with price transparency and market access. http://www.wired.co.uk/article/mfarm. Accessed 31 Jan 2018

  44. Kedja, S.: Four building stones for a vibrant ICT environment. ICT Update, pp. 8–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Manfre, C., Rubin, D., Allen, A., Summerfield, G., Colverson, K., Akeredolu, M.: Reducing the Gender Gap in Agricultural Extension and Advisory Services: How to Find the Best Fit for Men and Women Farmers. MEAS Brief # 2. MEAS, Urbana (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Heeks, R.: IT innovation for the bottom of the pyramid. Commun. ACM 55(12), 24 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ngoasong, M., Korda, A., Paton, R.: Impact Investing and Inclusive Business Development in Africa: A research agenda. The Open University, Milton Keynes (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Seyfang, G., Haxeltine, A.: Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environ. Plan. C Polit. Sp. 30(3), 381–400 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Paunov, C.: Innovation and inclusive development: a discussion of the main policy issues. Cape Town, South Africa (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kenny, C.: Could Solar Lighting Be the Next Mobile Phone? Center for Global Development (2012). https://www.cgdev.org/blog/could-solar-lighting-be-next-mobile-phone. Accessed 31 Jan 2018

  51. Burger, R.: What we have learnt from post-1994 innovations in pro-poor service delivery in South Africa: a case study-based analysis. Dev. South. Afr. 22(4), 483–500 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. Van Mele, P., Wanvoeke, J., Zossou, E.: Enhancing rural learning, linkages, and institutions: the rice videos in Africa. Dev. Pract. 20(3), 414–421 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dahlman, C.J.: Innovation Policy for Inclusive Development. OECD Global Forum, Paris (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Smith, A., Fressoli, M., Thomas, H.: Grassroots innovation movements: Challenges and contributions. J. Clean. Prod. 63, 114–124 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Leach, M. et al.: Transforming Innovation for Sustainability. Ecol. Soc. 17(2) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bryden, J., Gezelius, S.S., Refsgaard, K., Sutz, J.: Inclusive innovation in the bioeconomy: concepts and directions for research. Innov. Dev. 7(1), 1–16 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plann. 35(4), 216–224 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Atkinson, D.: Regional development, innovation and pro-poor development: missing links in the South African planning system. In: Conference on Overcoming Structural Poverty and Inequality in South Africa, pp. 1–26 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kapuire, G.K., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Chivuno-Kuria, S., Bidwell, N.J., Blake, E.: A revolution in ICT, the last hope for African Rural Communities’ technology appropriation. In: International Development Informatics Association Conference (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  60. UNCTAD: Pro-poor technology, innovation and entrepreneurship policies. In: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gumbo, S., Thinyane, H., Thinyane, M., Terzoli, A., Hansen, S.: Living Lab Methodology as an Approach to Innovation in ICT4D: The Siyakhula Living Lab Experience. In: IST-Africa (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Viviers, A.: A fire detection system for shacks. designindaba.com,.http://www.designindaba.com/articles/creative-work/fire-detection-system-shacks. Accessed 31 Jan 2018

  63. Dearden, A., Rizvi, H.: Adapting participatory and agile software methods to participatory rural development. In: 10th Conference on Participatory Design, pp. 221–225 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Fendler, L.: Others and the problem of community. Curric. Inq. 36(3), 303–326 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Paul Mungai & Jean-Paul Van Belle

  2. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    Andrea Jimenez & Dorothea Kleine

Authors
  1. Paul Mungai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Jimenez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dorothea Kleine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jean-Paul Van Belle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Paul Van Belle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Kirstin Krauss

  2. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

    Marita Turpin

  3. University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Filistea Naude

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mungai, P., Jimenez, A., Kleine, D., Van Belle, JP. (2019). The Role of the Marginalized and Unusual Suspects in the Production of Digital Innovations: Models of Innovation in an African Context. In: Krauss, K., Turpin, M., Naude, F. (eds) Locally Relevant ICT Research. IDIA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 933. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11235-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11235-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11234-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11235-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation