Abstract
Although ICT4D impacts peoples’ lives, drivers for change are often from a self-serving perspective, and not sustainable, due to lack of buy-in in the affected communities. To overcome this, ICT4D must move from laboratory approaches and collaboration to grassroots innovation, with communities designing their use of ICT. This study presents three cases of ICT4D projects in underserved communities in Cape Town, South Africa, with the aim of determining enablers of egalitarian participation to support grassroots innovations. Egalitarian participation encourages acquiring self-confidence and empowerment, while remaining motivated to be part of the process. In the processes analysed, an emergent approach, characterised by openness, relaxed rules and flexibility, allowed participants to work on their skills to increase confidence in their capabilities, and to evaluate new opportunities. The primary outcome of an approach based on relationships, and not on design rules, promoted inclusive participation. Collectives engaged in processes, and developed self-determined behaviours and cohesion in supporting their communities. The social goal of the activities, where creativity developed ‘not for the sake of it’ backed the main aim of the egalitarian approach, involved the community and created ownership. Analysis of the cases highlighted methodological patterns that could potentially be replicated, and which are presented as enablers for egalitarian participation in underserved communities. In contrast to the approach of purely supplying solutions, a reflexive approach, permeated by the principles of mutual learning and solidarity, was observed, which evolved into grassroots innovations.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Walsham, G.: ICT4D research: reflections on history and future agenda. Inf. Technol. Dev. 23(1), 18–41 (2017)
Heeks, R.: The ICT4D 2.0 Manifesto. University of Manchester. Institute for development policy and management. Development informatics group, Manchester, UK (2009)
Heeks, R.: Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development? J. Int. Dev. 22(5), 625–640 (2010)
Rey-Moreno, C., Sabiescu, A.G., Siya, M.J., Tucker, M.D.: Local ownership, exercise of ownership and moving from passive to active entitlement: a practice-led inquiry on a rural community network. J. Commun. Inform. 11(2), 1–16 (2015)
Aluwihare-Samaranayake, D.: Ethics in qualitative research: A view of the participants’ and researchers’ world from a critical standpoint. Int. J. Qual. Methods 11(2), 64–81 (2012)
Kapuire, G.K., Blake, E.: An attempt to merge local and technological paradigms in the digital representation of indigenous knowledge. In: Proceedings of the Indigenous Knowledge Technology Conference, pp. 28–72. IKTC, Windhoek, Namibia (2011)
Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Bidwell, N.J., Blake, E.: Community consensus: design beyond participation. Des. Issues 28(3), 89–100 (2012)
Manzini, E., Rizzo, F.: Small projects/large changes: participatory design as an open participated process. CoDesign 7(3–4), 199–215 (2011)
Finlay, L.: Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qual. Res. 2(2), 209–230 (2002)
Healy, K.: Participatory action research and social work: a critical appraisal. Int. Soc. Work 44(1), 93–105 (2001)
Guillemin, M., Gillam, L.: Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qual. Inq. 10(2), 261–280 (2004)
Blevins, D., Farmer, M.S., Edlund, C., Sullivan, G., Kirchner, J.E.: Collaborative research between clinicians and researchers: a multiple case study of implementation. Implementation Sci. 5(76), 1–9 (2010)
Yost, M.R., Chmielewski, J.F.: Blurring the line between researcher and researched in interview studies: a feminist practice? Psychol. Women Q. 37(2), 242–250 (2013)
Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Planners 35(4), 216–224 (1969)
Jokela, T., Iivari, N., Matero, J., Karukka, M.: The standard of user-centred design and the standard definition of usability: analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO 9241-11. In: Proceedings of the Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 53–60. ACM, New York (2003)
Maunder, A., Marsden, G., Tucker, W.D.: Evaluating the relevance of the “Real Access” criteria as a framework for rural HCI research. In: van Greunen, D. (ed.) 5th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Southern Africa. ACM, Cape Town (2006)
Eason, K.D.: User-centred design: for users or by users? Ergonomics 38(8), 1667–1673 (1995)
Nygaard, K., Terje Bergo, O.: The trade unions-new users of research. Pers. Rev. 4(2), 5–10 (1975)
Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983)
Simonsen, J., Robertson, T.: Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledgse, New York (2013)
Greenbaum, J., Hillsdale, N.J., Kying, M.: Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1991)
Sanders, E.B.N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4(1), 5–18 (2008)
Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E.: Meta-design: a framework for the future of end-user development. In: Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Wulf,V. (eds.) End User Development. Human-Computer Interaction Series, vol. 9. Springer, Dordrecht (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5386-X_19
Schumacher, J., Feurstein, K.: Living Labs-the user as co-creator. In: Proceedings 13th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising (ICE 2007). The Free Press, Sophia-Antipolis (2007)
Burns, C., Cottam, H., Vanstone, C., Winhall, J.: RED paper 02: Transformation Design. Design Council, London (2006)
Sangiorgi, D.: Transformative services and transformation design. Int. J. Des. 5(2), 29–40 (2011)
Karnieli-Miller, O., Strier, R., Pessach, L.: Power relations in qualitative research. Qual. Health Res. 19(2), 279–289 (2009)
Hussain, M.: Grassroots innovation: a systematic review of two decades of research. J. Cleaner Prod. 137, 973–981 (2016)
City of Cape Town City. https://www.capetown.gov.za/en/stats/Pages/-Census-Suburb-Profiles-land.aspx. Accessed 16 June 2016
Surender, R., Noble, M., Wright, G., Ntshongwana, P.: Social assistance and dependency in South Africa: an analysis of attitudes to paid work and social grants. J. Soc. Policy 39(2), 203–221 (2010)
Bank, L.: Living together, moving apart: home-made agendas, identity politics and urban-rural linkages in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. J. Contemp. Afr. Stud. 19(1), 129–147 (2001)
Roth, J.: Informal micro-finance schemes: the case of funeral insurance in South Africa. International Labour Office Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (2000)
Robins, S.L.: From Revolution to Rights in South Africa: Social Movements NGOs & Popular Politics after Apartheid. Boydell & Brewer, Suffolk (2010)
Quarterly labour force survey: Quarter. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P02111stQuarter2016.pdfst. Accessed 16 June 2016
Dearden, A.: See no evil?: ethics in an interventionist ICTD. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, pp. 46–55. ACM, New York (2012)
Morgan, D.: The Focus Group Guidebook, vol. 1. Sage publications, London (1997)
Leech, N.L., Onwuegbuzie, A.J.: An array of qualitative data analysis tools: a call for data analysis triangulation. Sch. Psychol. Q. 22(4), 557 (2007)
Lennie, J., Tacchi, J.: Evaluating Communication for Development: A Framework for Social Change. Routledge, New York (2013)
Lorini, M.R., van Zyl, I., Chigona, W.: ICTs for inclusive communities: a critical discourse analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Development Informatics Association Conference, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, pp. 78–94 (2014)
Lorini, M.R., Sabiescu, A., Memarovic, N.: Collective digital storytelling in community-based co-design projects an emergent approach. J. Commun. Inform. 13(1), 109–136 (2017)
Tritter, J.Q., McCallum, A.: The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 76(2), 56–168 (2006)
Minkler, M.: Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Educ. Behav. 31(6), 684–697 (2004)
Dearden, A., Haider Rizvi, S.M.: ICT4D and participatory design. In: The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society, pp. 395–403. Wiley, Chichester (2015)
Dell, N., Vaidyanathan, V., Medhi, I., Cutrell, E., Thies, W.: Yours is better!: participant response bias in HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1321–1330. ACM, New York (2012)
Sanders, L., Stappers, P.J.: From designing to co-designing to collective dreaming: three slices in time. Interactions 21(6), 24–33 (2014)
Alexiou, K.: Coordination and emergence in design. CoDesign 6(2), 75–97 (2010)
Fischer, G.: Meta-design: beyond user-centered and participatory design. In: Proceedings of HCI International, pp. 99–92. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003)
Cornwall, A.: Unpacking ‘participation’: models, meanings and practices. Commun. Develop. J. 43(3), 269–283 (2008)
Acknowledgements
A sincere thank you to the community groups – Mamas, Youth and Community Radio, and the external professionals – the RLabs, the web designer and the journalists.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lorini, M.R., Chigona, W., Garbutt, M. (2019). Enablers of Egalitarian Participation: Case Studies in Underserved Communities in South Africa. Processes of Creativity “Not for the Sake of it”. In: Krauss, K., Turpin, M., Naude, F. (eds) Locally Relevant ICT Research. IDIA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 933. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11235-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11235-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11234-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11235-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)