Skip to main content

The Business Model Network

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The eSports industry is highly volatile and in the midst of exponential growth; however, it becomes evident that a common understanding influences the eSports industry. The focus is on a value integration toward the audience and doing business around this audience. Furthermore, there are three existing rules: coopetition, co-destiny, and convergence. These rules imply an increased interconnectedness of stakeholders and result in a tight business model network. However, with the entrance of new organizations, the business model network may experience frictions and this development may in the future lead to changes in the business model network of the eSports industry, eventually changing the prevailing rules of coopetition, co-destiny, and convergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beckert, Jens. 2010. Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change. Sociological Theory 28 (2): 150–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, Richard, Charles E. Clark, Donald G. Malcolm, Clifford J. Craft, and Franc M. Ricciardi. 1957. On the Construction of a Multi-Stage, Multi-Person Business Game. Operations Research 5 (4): 469–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, Maria, and Sören Kock. 2003. Tension in Co-opetition. Paper presented at the Academy of Marketing Science Annual Conference, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A.M., and B.J. Nalebuff. 1996. Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenda, Ho Kai Sze. 2017. Spectating the Rift: A Study into eSports Spectatorship. In eSports Yearbook 2015/16, ed. Julia Hiltscher and Tobias M. Scholz, 9–35. Norderstedt, Germany: Books on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brolos, Anette. 2009. Innovative Coopetition: The Strength of Strong Ties. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 8 (1): 110–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucherer, Eva, Uli Eisert, and Oliver Gassmann. 2012. Towards Systematic Business Model Innovation: Lessons from Product Innovation Management. Creativity and Innovation Management 21 (2): 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, Ramon, and Joan E. Ricart. 2010. From Strategy to Business Models and Onto Tactics. Long Range Planning 43 (2): 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, Henry, and Richard S. Rosenbloom. 2002. The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s Technology Spin-Off Companies. Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (3): 529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DaSilva, Carlos M., and Peter Trkman. 2014. Business Model: What It Is and What It Is Not. Long Range Planning 47 (6): 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidow, William H., and Michael S. Malone. 1992. The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation of the 21st Century. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Socio-logical Review 48 (2): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESC.watch. 2018. The International 2018 Statistics. Accessed 2 November 2018. https://esc.watch/blog/post/stats-international-2018.

  • Foss, Nicolai J., and Tina Saebi. 2017. Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation. How Far Have We Come, and Where Should We Go? Journal of Management 43 (1): 200–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, Devi R., and Byung-Jin R. Park. 2011. Co-opetition Between Giants: Collaboration with Competitors for Technological Innovation. Research Policy 40 (5): 650–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heichel, Stephan, Jessica Pape, and Thomas Sommerer. 2005. Is There Convergence in Convergence Research? An Overview of Empirical Studies on Policy Convergence. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 817–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanagha, Saeed, Henk Volberda, and Ilan Oshri. 2014. Business Model Renewal and Ambidexterity: Structural Alteration and Strategy Formation Process During Transition to a Cloud Business Model. R&D Management 44 (3): 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klang, David, Maria Wallnöfer, and Fredrik Hacklin. 2014. The Business Model Paradox: A Systematic Review and Exploration of Antecedents. International Journal of Management Reviews 16 (4): 454–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei, Annie. 2018. South Korea Esports Network OGN to Invest at Least $100 Million in North America, Plans Big Partnership with Battle Royale Giant PUBG. Accessed 2 November 2018. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/10/esports-network-ogn-to-invest-at-least-100-million-in-north-america.html.

  • Porter, Michael E. 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review 79 (3): 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, Christian. 2000. Strategische Organisation. Multiperspektivität und Virtualität. Landsberg, Lech: moderne industrie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, Tobias M. forthcoming. Coopetition and Co-destiny as Business Model: Lessons from the eSports Industry. In Media Business Models: Connecting Media to Their Markets, ed. Christian Scholz and Steve Wildman. Porto: Media XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J. 2010. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning 43 (2): 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Business Models and Dynamic Capabilities. Long Range Planning 51 (1): 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Wenpin. 2002. Social Structure of ‘Coopetition’ Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing. Organization Science 13 (2): 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walley, Keith. 2007. Coopetition: An Introduction to the Subject and an Agenda for Research. International Studies of Management & Organization 37 (2): 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, Muhammad, Bertrand Moingeon, and Laurence Lehmann-Ortega. 2010. Building Social Business Models: Lessons from the Grameen Experience. Long Range Planning 43 (2): 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, Christoph, and Raphael Amit. 2009. The Business Model as the Engine of Network-Based Strategies. In The Network Challenge. Strategy Profit, and Risk in an Interlinked World, ed. Paul R. Kleindorfer and Yoram J. Wind, 259–275. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, Christoph, Raphael Amit, and Lorenzo Massa. 2011. The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. Journal of Management 37 (4): 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias M. Scholz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scholz, T.M. (2019). The Business Model Network. In: eSports is Business. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11199-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics