Skip to main content

Research Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1140 Accesses

Part of the book series: Management, Change, Strategy and Positive Leadership ((MACHSTPOLE))

Abstract

This chapter provides a deeper look into the methods and approaches used at the Delbecq Retreat, including the origin of the questions, the selection of the Nominal Group Technique (NGT), the demographics of participants, and the research methods employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interaction: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. (2000). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbecq, A. L. (2016). Integrating spiritual and managerial insights within senior executive teams”. In M. Nennifer, T. Kovac, & G. Miller (Eds.), Spirituality: An interdisciplinary view, Oxford. UK: Interdisciplinary Net Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, G. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heineman-Pieper, J., Tyson, K., & Pieper, M. H. (2002). Doing good science without sacrificing good values: Why the heuristic paradigm is the best choice for social work. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 83(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, U. (1997) Theory building in qualitative research and computer programs for the management of textual data. Sociological Research Online, 2(2). Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/1.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, G. (2012). An introduction to Moustakas’s heuristic method. Nurse Researcher, 19(3), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, G. (2012). The sacred in the modern world: A cultural sociological approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2003). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffe, G. K., Nielsen, L. A., Knight, R. L., & Schenborn, D. A. (2002). Ecosystem management: adaptive, community-based conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press. 219–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustakas, C. (2011). Heuristic research: Design, methodology and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995641.

  • Miller, K. D. (2017). Interfaith dialogue in a secular field. Management research review, 40(8), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2016-0129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L. (2012). Overview and development of a trait-based measure of numinous constructs: The Assessment of Spirituality and Religious Sentiments (ASPIRES) Scale. In Miller, L. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psychology and spirituality. Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemer, W. F., Connelly, N. A., Brown, T. L., & Decker, D. J. (2001). Methods of inquiry: Some basics for the manager. In D. J. Decker, T. L. Brown, & W. F. Seimer (Eds.), Human dimensions of wildlife management in North America (pp. 375–400). Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel E. Harris .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harris, D.E., Holyfield, L., Jones, L., Ellis, R., Neal, J. (2019). Research Methods. In: Spiritually and Developmentally Mature Leadership. Management, Change, Strategy and Positive Leadership. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11175-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics