Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

For a Post-Anthropocentric Socio-Nature Relationship in the Anthropocene

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
After the Anthropocene

Part of the book series: Environmental Politics and Theory ((EPT))

  • 797 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a critique of the strong (arrogant) version of anthropocentrism on the account that the exclusive defense of human interests it promotes cannot secure the preservation of ecosystems on which humanity depends to thrive and survive in the context of the Anthropocene. This is why the shift to a post-anthropocentrism which takes into account the macroscopic and interrelated conditions of human life, is also desirable from a humanist standpoint. Post-anthropocentrism is grounded in the belief that human life can only endure through the protection of the whole Eco-biosphere and that humanity cannot isolate itself from the destiny of Earth community and its nonhuman subjects (as opposed to nonhuman ‘objects’). That involves seeing a meaning also in nature and considering our lives as set in a larger context than the one exclusively given by human societies. This chapter calls for an alliance between ecocentric and weak anthropocentric views, that is, between the defense of the intrinsic value of nature and the promotion of an ‘ecological ethics of use’ for the natural world. It makes a strong case for the integration of the intrinsic value of nature in political and legal governance, i.e., the introduction of Earth Jurisprudence in the judicial system. It particularly focuses on the legal, constitutional and political defense of the independent rights that could be ascribed to natural entities and especially ecosystems in order to ensure the maintenance, self-regulation and protection of Earth systems (hydrosphere, geosphere, atmosphere and biosphere), and by extension, to human and non-human life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbey, E. (1988). Desert Solitaire. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, S. (1994). Cyborg and Ecofeminist Interventions: Challenges for an Environmental Feminism. Feminist Studies, 20(1), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allott, P. (1990). Eunomia: New Order for a New World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias-Maldonado, M. (2012). Real Green. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asafu-Adjaye, J., Blomquist, L., Brand, S., Brook, B. W., Defries, R., Ellis, E., …, Lynas, M. (2015). An Ecomodernist Manifesto. Retrieved from https://Static1.Squarespace.Com/Static/5515d9f9e4b04d5c3198b7bb/T/552d37bbe4b07a7dd69fcdbb/1429026747046/An+Ecomodernist+Manifesto.Pdf.

  • Bacon, F. (2000 [1620]). Novum Organum. In L. Jardine, & M. Silverthorne (Eds.), Francis Bacon: The New Organon. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J. (1996). Green Political Theory: Nature, Virtue and Progress (Unpublished PhD in Political Theory). Department of Politics, University of Glasgow, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J. (1999). Rethinking Green Politics: Nature, Virtue and Progress. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J. (2012). The Politics of Actually Existing Unsustainability: Human Flourishing in a Climate-Changed, Carbon Constrained World. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J. (2016). Bio-Fuelling the Hummer? Transdisciplinary Thoughts on Techno-Optimism and Innovation in the Transition from Unsustainability. In E. Byrne, G. Mullally, & C. Sage (Eds.), Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Transitions to Sustainability (pp. 106–123). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. J. (2006). Environmental Stewardship. London: A & C Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, T. (1999). The Great Work, Our Way into the Future. New York: Bell Tower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J.-B. (2016). The Shock of the Anthropocene. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugge, H. C. (2013). Twelve Fundamental Challenges in Environmental Law: An Introduction to the Concept of Rule of Law for Nature. In C. Voigt (Ed.), Rule of Law for Nature: New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law (pp. 3–26). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, P. (Ed.). (2011a). Exploring Wild Law: The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence. Adelaide, Australia: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, P. (2011b). The Jurisprudence of Thomas Berry. Worldviews, 15, 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, P. (2011c). The Great Jurisprudence. In P. Burdon (Ed.), Exploring Wild Law: The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence (pp. 59–75). Adelaide, Australia: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, P. D. (2013). The Earth Community and Ecological Jurisprudence. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 3(5), 815–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, T. (2014). Lives not Our Own. In G. Wuerthner, E. Crist, & T. Butler (Eds.), Keeping the Wild: Against the Domestication of Earth. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafaro, P. (2014). Expanding Parks, Reducing Human Numbers, and Preserving all the Wild Nature We Can: A Superior Alternative to Embracing the Anthropocene Era. In G. Wuerthner, E. Crist, & T. Butler (Eds.), Keeping the Wild: Against the Domestication of Earth (pp. 137–145). San Francisco, CA: Island Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1983). The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Rising Culture. Toronto: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crist, E. (2010). Intimations of Gaia. In E. Crist & B. Rinker (Eds.), Gaia in Turmoil: Climate Change, Biodepletion, and Earth Ethics in an Age of Crisis (pp. 315–336). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, E. (2013). On the Poverty of Our Nomenclature. Environmental Humanities, 3, 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, E. (2014). Ptolemaic Environmentalism. In G. Wuerthner, E. Crist, & T. Butler (Eds.), Keeping the Wild: Against the Domestication of Earth (pp. 16–30). Washington: Island Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinan, C. (2002). Wild Law: A Manifesto for Earth Justice. Adelaide, Australia: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinan, C. (2007). Sowing Wild Law. Environmental Law & Management, 19(2), 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinan, C. (2011). If Nature Had Rights What Would We Need to Give Up? In P. Burdon (Ed.), Exploring Wild Law: The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence. Adelaide, Australia: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, P. (2011). Ecological Ethics. An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall, B. (1986). Interview with Dave Foreman. Simple Living, 2(12).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, F. (2010). The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society. New York, NY: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. (1993). Critical Theory and Green Politics. In A. Dobson & P. Lucardie (Eds.), The Politics of Nature: Explorations in Green Political Theory (pp. 190–209). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and Political Theory: Towards an Ecocentric Approach. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2004). The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, D. W. (1978). The Arrogance of Humanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E. C., & Ramankutty, N. (2008). Putting People in the Map: Anthropogenic Biomes of the World. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(8), 439–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filgueira, B., & Mason, I. (2011). Wild Law: Is There any Evidence of Earth Jurisprudence in Existing Law? In P. Burdon (Ed.), Exploring Wild Law: The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence (pp. 192–203). Adelaide, Australia: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FoEI. (2015, November 2). Financialization of Nature: Creating a new Definition of Nature. Brochure, 1–16. Retrieved from https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Financialization-of-Nature-brochure-English.pdf.

  • Foreman, D. (2015, August 26). The Anthropocene and Ozymandias. Blog. Retrieved from http://Dark-Mountain.Net/Blog/The-Anthropocene-And-Ozymandias/.

  • Fosci, M., & West, T. (2016). In Whose Interest? Instrumental and Intrinsic Value in Biodiversity Law. In M. Michael Bowman, P. Davies, & E. Goodwin (Eds.), Research Handbook on Biodiversity and Law (pp. 55–77). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fremaux, A. (2011). La Nécessité D’une Écologie Radicale. Paris: Sang de La Terre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1973). The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K., Rose, D., & Fincher, R. (2015). Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene. New York: Punctum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, E. (1993). The Way: An Ecological Worldview. Boston, MA: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1994). Eight Little Piggies: Reflections in Natural History. London: Penguin Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, N. (2010). Lawscape: Property, Environment, Law. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hailwood, S. (2015). Alienation and Nature in Environmental Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hannis, M. (2015). Freedom and Environment: Flourishing, Autonomy and The Political Philosophy of Sustainability. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, E. C. (1992). Weak Anthropocentric Intrinsic Value. The Monist, 75(2), 183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, T. (1997). Anthropocentrism: A Misunderstood Problem. Environmental Values, 6, 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2005). Hegel’s Preface to the Phenomenology of Spirit. Translation and Running Commentary by Yirmiyahu Yovel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays (1953). New York and London: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, P. (2012). Seeding Intrinsic Values: How a Law of Ecocide Will Shift Our Consciousness. Cadmus, 1(5), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002 [1947]). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2014). Climate Change and Virtue: An Apologetic. Humanities, 3(3), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. (1957). New Bottles for New Wine. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, D. (2014). With Friends Like These, Wilderness and Biodiversity Do Not Need Enemies. In G. Wuerthner, E. Crist, & T. Butler (Eds.), Keeping the Wild: Against the Domestication of Earth. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., & Marvier, M. (2007). Conservation for the People. Scientific American, 297(4), 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., & Lalasz, R. (2012). Conservation in the Anthropocene. Breakthrough Journal, 2, 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. (1997). Nature as Subject: Human Obligation and Natural Community. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovel, J. (2008). The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World? New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitos, J. (2013). Rules of Law for Use and Nonuse of Nature. In C. Voigt (Ed.), Rule of Law for Nature: New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law (pp. 209–221). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2010). An Attempt at a ‘Compositionist Manifesto’. New Literary History, 41(3), 471–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1992). The View from Afar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, A. (2002). Restoring Ecological Citizenship. In B. A. Minteer, & B. T. Pepperman (Eds.), Democracy and the Claims of Nature: Critical Perspectives for a New Century (pp. 153–172). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, J. (1994). Rogue Primate: An Exploration of Human Domestication. Toronto: Roberts Rinehart Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H. (2014). Green Postmodernism and the Attempted Highjacking of Conservation. In G. Wuerthner, E. Crist, & T. Butler (Eds.), Keeping the Wild: Against the Domestication of Earth (pp. 146–161). Washington: Island Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J., Hulme, M., …, Vasileiadou, E. (2014, September 6). Taking the (Human) Sciences Seriously: Realizing the Critical Potential of the Anthropocene. Paper Presented at The EPCR General Conference, Glasgow. Unpublished Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1972). Counterrevolution and Revolt. London: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L. (1995). Gaia Is a Tough Bitch. In J. Brockman (Ed.), The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution (pp. 129–146). New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, E. (2011). Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, F. (1996). Community and the Ecological self. In F. Mathews (Ed.), Ecology and Democracy (pp. 66–100). London and Portland, OR: Frank Kass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, F. (2003). For Love of Matter: A Contemporary Panpsychism. Albany, NY: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane, K. (2007a). Why Environmental Ethics Shouldn’t Give Up on Intrinsic Value. Environmental Ethics, 29(1), 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShane, K. (2007b). Anthropocentrism vs. Nonanthropocentrism: Why Should We Care? Environmental Values, 16(169), 185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morito, B. (2003). Intrinsic Value: A Modern Albatross for the Ecological Approach. Environmental Values, 12, 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, K. (2016). The Decentered, Ecocentric Humanism of Pierre Rabhi in La Part Du Colibri. Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 70(1), 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. (1989). The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. G. (1984). Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics, 6(2), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. (1991). Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. (1995). Why I am Not a Nonanthropocentrist: Callicott and the Failure of Monistic Inherentism. Environmental Ethics, 17, 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrings, C., Naeem, S., Ahrestani, F., Bunker, D. E., Burkill, P., Canziani, G., …, Weisser, W. (2010a). Conservation. Ecosystem Services for 2020. Science (New York, NY), 330(6002), 323–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings, C., Naeem, S., Ahrestani, F., Bunker, D., Burkill, P., Canziani, G., …, Jasic, F. (2010b). Biodiversity Transcends Services–Response. Science, 330(6012), 1745–1745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, K. (2016, August 7). The Anthropocentrism of the Anthropocene. Prezi Presentation. Retrieved from http://Prezi.Com/Fjp8nd8czuwl/?Utm_Campaign=Share&Utm_Medium=Copy.

  • Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H. (1993). Rights and Responsibilities on the Home Planet. Zygon, 28(4), 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H. (2017, Spring). Technology and/or Nature: Denatured/Renatured/Engineered/Artifacted Life? Ethics & the Environment, 22(1), 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. S. (1993). Ecocentrism and Traditional Ecological Knowledge. Ecospherics Ethics. Retrieved from http://www.ecospherics.net/pages/Ro993tek_1.html.

  • Royal Society of London. (2009). Reaping the Benefits: Science and the Sustainable Intensification of Global Agriculture. London, UK: Royal Society of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi, R., Chapin, F. S., III, Callicott, J. B., Pickett, S. T., Power, M. E., Armesto, J. J., …, May, R. H. Jr. (2015). Earth Stewardship: Linking Ecology and Ethics in Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, R. L. (2007). Character and Environment: A Virtue-Oriented Approach to Environmental Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, R., & Cafaro, P. (Eds.). (2005). Environmental Virtue Ethics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, L. (2013). Realizing Nature’s Rule of Law Through Rights of Waterways. In C. Voigt (Ed.), Rule of Law for Nature: New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law (pp. 222–240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldrake, R. (1994). The Rebirth of Nature: The Greening of Science and God. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldrake, R. (1995). A New Science of Life: The Hypothesis of Morphic Resonance. Rochester, VT: Park Street Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellenberger, M., & Nordhaus, T. (2011). Evolve: A Case for Modernization as the Road to Salvation. Orion, 30(1), 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, D. (2015). Nature as a Legal Person. Vertigo-La Revue Électronique en Sciences de L’environnement (Hors-Série 22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1996). The Production of Nature. In G. Robertson, J. Bird, B. Curtis, M. Mash, T. Putnam, & L. Tickner (Eds.), Future Natural: Nature, Science, Culture (pp. 35–54). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2001). An Ethics of Place: Radical Ecology, Postmodernity, and Social Theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2011). Against Ecological Sovereignty: Ethics, Biopolitics, and Saving the Natural World. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. D. (1972). Should Trees Have Standing-Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Southern California Law Review, 45, 450–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S. (2010). Ecosystem Service Commodities—A New Imperial Ecology? Implications for Animist Immanent Ecologies, with Deleuze and Guattari. New Formations, 69(1), 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvan, R., & Bennett, D. (1994). The Greening of Ethics: From Human Chauvinism to Deep-Green Theory. Cambridge: White Horse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, S. (1990, November/December). Earth First!: What next? Mother Jones (pp. 47–49, 76–80).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. W. (2011 [1986]). Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treanor, B. (2014). Emplotting Virtue: A Narrative Approach to Environmental Virtue Ethics. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wensveen (van), L. (2000). Dirty Virtues: The Emergence of Ecological Virtue Ethics. New York: Humanity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, A. (1996). Beyond Intrinsic Value: Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics. In A. Light & E. Katz (Eds.), Environmental Pragmatism (pp. 285–306). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, H. W. (1985). The United Nations World Charter for Nature: The Developing Nations’ Initiative to Establish Protections for The Environment. Ecology Law Quarterly, 12(4), 977–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, M. B. (2017). Extending Court-Protected Legal Person Status to Non-Human Entities. International Journal for Court Administration, 8(2), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK

    Anne Fremaux

Authors
  1. Anne Fremaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Fremaux .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fremaux, A. (2019). For a Post-Anthropocentric Socio-Nature Relationship in the Anthropocene. In: After the Anthropocene. Environmental Politics and Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11120-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation