Skip to main content

Conservation Telecouplings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Telecoupling

Abstract

Local threats to biodiversity are increasingly caused by distal drivers. Likewise, conservation responses are increasingly shaped by distal actors and processes as information on biodiversity loss percolates, and this, in turn, triggers conservation actions. Here, we define these actions as conservation telecouplings, that is, the coupling of distal social-ecological systems through conservation responses. These conservation responses can take diverse forms, such as inflows of funding, capacity, policies, or concrete projects, but always originate in one system in response to biodiversity loss in another. We discuss major types of conservation telecouplings and highlight how this concept might help to distinguish between targeted and diffuse threats by detecting entry points for conservation, by increasing conservation effectiveness, and by opening up new ways for conservation planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Food and Agricultural Organization: www.fao.org/faostat.

  2. 2.

    The World Bank (2012): Maximising Mobile. Information and Communications for Development 2012. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

  3. 3.

    Full list: www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes/threats-classification-scheme.

  4. 4.

    When carrying out this categorisation, we adhered to a Euclidean concept of distance, meaning that different social-ecological systems are separate geographic spaces (e.g. cities linked to rural systems in their hinterland or too far-away regions through trade). Other concepts of distance, such as social or institutional distance, might be equally relevant (see Chaps. 3, 9, and 18) but are omitted here.

  5. 5.

    UN World Urbanization Prospects 2018: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/.

  6. 6.

    Full list: www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes/conservation-actions-classification-scheme-ver2.

  7. 7.

    www.gorongosa.org/our-story.

  8. 8.

    Charity Navigator. Historical Data: www.charitynavigator.org.

  9. 9.

    JNCC. 2014. Fifth. National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity: United Kingdom. Peterborough: JNCC. https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/gb/gb-nr-05-en.pdf.

  10. 10.

    http://aiddata.org/realizing-agenda-2030.

  11. 11.

    www.tompkinsconservation.org/home.htm.

  12. 12.

    www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/climate-and-environment/climate/climate-and-forest-initiative/kos-innsikt/samarbeidspartnere/id2345203/.

References

  • Armsworth, Paul R., Gretchen C. Daily, Peter Kareiva, and James N. Sanchirico. 2006. Land Market Feedbacks Can Undermine Biodiversity Conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 5403–5408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, Jodi S., and Ralph C. Buckley. 2018. A Global Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence of Ecotourism Impacts on Forests in Biodiversity Hotspots. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 32: 112–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brashares, J.S., C.D. Golden, K.Z. Weinbaum, C.B. Barrett, and G.V. Okello. 2011. Economic and Geographic Drivers of Wildlife Consumption in Rural Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 13931–13936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart, Stuart H.M., Matt Walpole, Ben Collen, Arco van Strien, Jörn P.W. Scharlemann, Rosamunde E. Almond, Jonathan E.M. Baillie, Bastian Bomhard, Claire Brown, John Bruno, Kent E. Carpenter, Geneviève M. Carr, Janice Chanson, Anna M. Chenery, Jorge Csirke, Nick C. Davidson, Frank Dentener, Matt Foster, Alessandro Galli, James N. Galloway, Piero Genovesi, Richard D. Gregory, Marc Hockings, Valerie Kapos, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Fiona Leverington, Jonathan Loh, Melodie A. McGeoch, Louise McRae, Anahit Minasyan, Monica Hernández Morcillo, Thomasina E.E. Oldfield, Daniel Pauly, Suhel Quader, Carmen Revenga, John R. Sauer, Benjamin Skolnik, Dian Spear, Damon Stanwell-Smith Simon N. Stuart, Andy Symes, Megan Tierney, Tristan D. Tyrrell, Jean-Christophe Vié, and Reg Watson. 2010. Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines. Science 328: 1164–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, L. Roman, Joleen Chan, Francesca L. McGrath, and T.P. Nghiem Le. 2017. Biodiversity Conservation in a Telecoupled World. Ecology and Society 22 (3): 24. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09448-220324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattarino, Lorenzo, Virgilio Hermoso, Josie Carwardine, Mark J. Kennard, and Simon Linke. 2015. Multi-Action Planning for Threat Management: A Novel Approach for the Spatial Prioritization of Conservation Actions. PLoS One 10: e0128027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary, Abhishek, L. Roman Carrasco, and Thomas Kastner. 2017. Linking National Wood Consumption with Global Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Losses. Science of the Total Environment 586: 985–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary, Abhishek, and Thomas Kastner. 2016. Land Use Biodiversity Impacts Embodied in International Food Trade. Global Environmental Change 38: 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daw, Tim M., Sarah Coulthard, William W.L. Cheung, Katrina Brown, Caroline Abunge, Diego Galafassi, Garry D. Peterson, Tim R. McClanahan, Johnstone O. Omukoto, and Lydiah Munyi. 2015. Evaluating Taboo Trade-Offs in Ecosystems Services and Human Well-Being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 6949–6954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Mata, Gonzales C., and Sait Riega-Campos. 2014. An Analysis of International Conservation Funding in the Amazon. Palo Alto, CA: Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, Sandra, Unai Pascual, Marie Stenseke, Berta Martín-López, Robert T. Watson, Zsolt Molnár, Rosemary Hill, Kai M.A. Chan, Ivar A. Baste, Kate A. Brauman, Stephen Polasky, Andrew Church, Mark Lonsdale, Anne Larigauderie, Paul W. Leadley, Alexander P.E. van Oudenhoven, Felice van der Plaat, Matthias Schröter, Sandra Lavorel, Yildiz Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Elena Bukvareva, Kirsten Davies, Sebsebe Demissew, Gunay Erpul, Pierre Failler, Carlos A. Guerra, Chad L. Hewitt, Hans Keune, Sarah Lindley, and Yoshihisa Shirayama. 2018. Assessing Nature’s Contributions to People. Science 359: 270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirzo, Rodolfo, Hillary S. Young, Mauro Galetti, Gerardo Ceballos, Nick J.B. Isaac, and Ben Collen. 2014. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345: 401–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, Hallie, Ruth DeFries, Suzi Kerr, Eric F. Lambin, Jianguo Liu, Peter J. Marcotullio, Peter Messerli, Anette Reenberg, Ximena Rueda, Simon R. Swaffled, Birka Wicke, and Karl Zimmerer. 2014. Significance of Telecoupling for Exploration of Land-Use Change. In Rethinking Global Land Use in an Urban Era, ed. Karen Seto and Anette Reenberg, 141–161. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fairhead, James, Melissa Leach, and Ian Scoones. 2012. Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature? The Journal of Peasant Studies 39: 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friis, Cecilie, Jonas Ø. Nielsen, Iago Otero, Helmut Haberl, Jörg Niewöhner, and Patrick Hostert. 2016. From Teleconnection to Telecoupling: Taking Stock of an Emerging Framework in Land System Science. Journal of Land Use Science 11: 131–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Game, Edward T., Erik Meijaard, Douglas Sheil, and Eve McDonald-Madden. 2014. Conservation in a Wicked Complex World; Challenges and Solutions. Conservation Letters 7: 271–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Toby A., Magnus Benzie, Jan Börner, Elena Dawkins, Stephen Fick, Rachael Garrett, Godar Javier, A. Grimard, S. Lake, R.K. Larsen, N. Mardas, C.L. McDermott, P. Meyfroidt, M. Osbeck, M. Persson, T. Sembres, C. Suavet, B. Strassburg, A. Trevisan, C. West, and P. Wolvekamp. 2018. Transparency and Sustainability in Global Commodity Supply Chains. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.025.

  • Gibbs, Holly K., Jacob Munger, Jessica L’Roe, Paulo Barreto, Ritaumaria Pereira, Matthew Christie, Ticiana Amaral, and Nathalie F. Walker. 2016. Did Ranchers and Slaughterhouses Respond to Zero-Deforestation Agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? Conservation Letters 9: 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimard, A., S. Lake, N. Mardas, J. Godar, and T. Gardner. 2017. Supply Chain Transparency Network: State of Play. Stockholm: Global Canopy Programme and Stockholm Environment Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, Volker, Daniel Ayllón, and Steven F. Railsback. 2017. Next-Generation Individual-Based Models Integrate Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Yes We Can, and Yes We Must. Ecosystems 20: 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, Helmut, Cheikh Mbow, Xiangzheng Deng, Elena G. Irwin, Suzi Kerr, Tobias Kuemmerle, Ole Mertz, Patrick Meyfroidt, and Benjamin L. Turner II. 2014. Finite Land Resources and Competition. In Rethinking Global Land Use in an Urban Era, ed. Karen C. Seto and Anette Reenberg, 34–69. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, J., R. Schuster, N. Morrell, M. Strimas-Mackey, M. Watts, P. Arcese, J. Bennett, and H.P. Possingham. 2017. Prioritizr: Systematic Conservation Prioritization in R. Version 4.0.2.7. Available at https://github.com/prioritizr/prioritizr.

  • Hertel, Thomas W., Navin Ramankutty, and Uris Lantz C. Baldos. 2014. Global Market Integration Increases Likelihood That a Future African Green Revolution Could Increase Crop Land Use and CO2 Emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 13799–13804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, David U., E. Carol Adair, Bradley J. Cardinale, Jarrett E.K. Byrnes, Bruce A. Hungate, Kristin L. Matulich, Andrew Gonzalez, J. Emmett Duffy, Lars Gamfeldt, and Mary I. Connor. 2012. A Global Synthesis Reveals Biodiversity Loss as a Major Driver of Ecosystem Change. Nature 486: 105–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwamura, Takuya, Yann le Polain de Waroux, and Michael B. Mascia. 2018. Considering People in Systematic Conservation Planning: Insights from Land System Science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 16: 388–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenk, Nicole L., and Brendon M.H. Larson. 2015. The Assisted Migration of Western Larch in British Columbia: A Signal of Institutional Change in Forestry in Canada? Global Environmental Change 31: 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, Eric F., Holly K. Gibbs, Robert Heilmayr, Kimberly M. Carlson, Leonardo C. Fleck, Rachael D. Garrett, Yann le Polain de Waroux, Constance L. McDermott, David McLaughlin, Peter Newton, Christoph Nolte, Pablo Pacheco, Lisa L. Rausch, Charlotte Streck, Tannis Thorlakson, and Nathalie F. Walker. 2018. The Role of Supply-Chain Initiatives in Reducing Deforestation. Nature Climate Change 8: 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, Elizabeth A., Brett A. Bryan, Erik Meijaard, Thilak Mallawaarachchi, Matthew J. Struebig, Matthew E. Watts, and Kerrie A. Wilson. 2017. Mixed Policies Give More Options in Multifunctional Tropical Forest Landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology 54: 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., D. Moran, K. Kanemoto, B. Foran, L. Lobefaro, and A. Geschke. 2012. International Trade Drives Biodiversity Threats in Developing Nations. Nature 486: 109–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Jianguo, Vanessa Hull, Mateus Batistella, Ruth DeFries, F. Fu Tom Dietz, Tom W. Hertel, E.F. Izaurralde, S.L. Lambin, Shuxin Li, Luis A. Martinelli, William J. McConnel, Emilio F. Moran, R. Naylor, Z. Ouyang, K.R. Polenske, Aneta Reenberg, G. de Miranda Rocha, C.S. Simmons, Peter H. Verburg, Peter M. Vitousek, Fusuo Zhang, and Chunquan Zhu. 2013. Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World. Ecology and Society 18 (2): 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Jianguo, Harold Mooney, Vanessa Hull, Steven J. Davis, Joanne Gaskell, Thomas Hertel, Jane Lubchenco, Karen C. Seto, Peter Gleick, Claire Kremen, and Shuxin Li. 2015. Systems Integration for Global Sustainability. Science 347: 1258832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, Sean L., Richard A. Fuller, Thomas M. Brooks, and James E.M. Watson. 2016. Biodiversity: The Ravages of Guns, Nets and Bulldozers. Nature 536: 143–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyfroidt, Patrick, Rinku Roy Chowdhury, Ariane de Bremond, Erle C. Ellis, Karl-Heinz Erb, Tatiana Filatova, Rachael D. Garrett, Morgan Grove, Andreas Heinimann, Tobias Kuemmerle, Christian A. Kull, Eric F. Lambin, Y. Landon, Yann le Polain de Waroux, Peter Messerli, Daniel Müller, Jonas Ø. Nielsen, Garry D. Peterson, V. Rodriguez García, Maja Schlüter, Benjamin L. Turner II, and Peter H. Verburg. 2018. Middle-Range Theories of Land System Change. Global Environmental Change 53: 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyfroidt, Patrick, Tan Phuong Vu, and Viet Anh Hoang. 2013. Trajectories of Deforestation, Coffee Expansion and Displacement of Shifting Cultivation in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Global Environmental Change 23: 1187–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phalan, Ben, Rhys E. Green, Lynn V. Dicks, Graziela Dotta, Claire Feniuk, Anthony Lamb, Bernardo B.N. Strassburg, David R. Williams, Erasmus K.H.J. zu Ermgassen, and Andrew Balmford. 2016. How Can Higher-Yield Farming Help to Spare Nature? Science 351: 450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, Jacob, Luis Roman Carrasco, Edward L. Webb, Lian Pin Koh, and Unai Pascual. 2013. Agricultural Intensification Escalates Future Conservation Costs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 7601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S.L., C.N. Jenkins, R. Abell, T.M. Brooks, J.L. Gittleman, L.N. Joppa, P.H. Raven, C.M. Roberts, and J.O. Sexton. 2014. The Biodiversity of Species and Their Rates of Extinction, Distribution, and Protection. Science 344: 1246752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquer-Rodríguez, M., M. Baumann, V. Butsic, H.I. Gasparri, G. Gavier-Pizarro, J.N. Volante, D. Müller, and T. Kuemmerle. 2018. The Potential Impact of Economic Policies on Future Land-Use Conversions in Argentina. Land Use Policy 79: 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripple, William J., Katharine Abernethy, Matthew G. Betts, Guillaume Chapron, Rodolfo Dirzo, Mauro Galetti, Taal Levi, Peter A. Lindsey, David W. Macdonald, Brian Machovina, Thomas M. Newsome, Carlos A. Peres, Arian D. Wallach, Christopher Wolf, and Hillary Young. 2016. Bushmeat Hunting and Extinction Risk to the World’s Mammals. Royal Society Open Science 3: 160498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, Thomas K. 2011. Local Actions, Global Effects? Understanding the Circumstances in which Locally Beneficial Environmental Actions Cumulate to Have Global Effects. Ecology and Society 16 (2): 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salafsky, Nick, Daniel Salzer, Alison J. Stattersfield, Craig Hilton-Taylor, Rachel Neugarten, Stuart H.M. Butchart, Ben Collen, Neil Cox, Lawrence l. Master, Sheila O’Connor, and David Wilkie. 2008. A Standard Lexicon for Biodiversity Conservation: Unified Classifications of Threats and Actions. Conservation Biology 22: 897–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephanson, Sheri L., and Michael B. Mascia. 2014. Putting People on the Map through an Approach That Integrates Social Data in Conservation Planning. Conservation Biology 28: 1236–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolton, Sue, Kent H. Redford, and Nigel Dudle. 2014. The Futures of Privately Protected Areas. Gland: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelneck, D., and T. Vilela. 2017. International Conservation Funding in the Amazon: An Updated Analysis. Palo Alto: Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke, Teja, Jeffrey C. Milder, Götz Schroth, Yann Clough, Fabrice DeClerck, Anthony Waldron, Robert Rice, and Jaboury Ghazoul. 2015. Conserving Biodiversity Through Certification of Tropical Agroforestry Crops at Local and Landscape Scales. Conservation Letters 8: 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter, O., E.W. Sanderson, A. Magrach, J.R. Allan, J. Beher, K.R. Jones, H.P. Possingham, W.F. Laurance, P. Wood, B.M. Fekete, M.A. Levy, and J.E.M. Watson. 2016. Sixteen Years of Change in the Global Terrestrial Human Footprint and Implications for Biodiversity Conservation. Nature Communications 7: 12558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Anthony, Daniel C. Miller, Dave Redding, Arne Mooers, Tyler S. Kuhn, Nate Nibbelink, J. Timmons Roberts, Joseph A. Tobias, and John L. Gittleman. 2017. Reductions in Global Biodiversity Loss Predicted from Conservation Spending. Nature 551: 364–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Anthony, Arne O. Mooers, Daniel C. Miller, Nate Nibbelink, David Redding, Tyler S. Kuhn, J. Timmons Roberts, and John L. Gittleman. 2013. Targeting Global Conservation Funding to Limit Immediate Biodiversity Declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 12144–12148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Robert, Nathan J. Moore, Eugenio Arima, Stephen Perz, Cynthia Simmons, Marcellus Caldas, Dante Vergara, and Claudio Bohrer. 2009. Protecting the Amazon with Protected Areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 10582–10586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, David S., Xingli Giam, David P. Edwards, Brendan Fisher, and Lian Pin Koh. 2013. Navjot’s Nightmare Revisited: Logging, Agriculture, and Biodiversity in Southeast Asia. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 531–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K.A., E. Meijaard, S. Drummond, H.S. Grantham, L. Boitani, G. Catullo, L. Christie, R. Dennis, I. Dutton, A. Falcucci, L. Maiorano, H.P. Possingham, C. Rondinini, W.R. Turner, O. Venter, and M. Watts. 2010. Conserving Biodiversity in Production Landscapes. Ecological Applications 20: 1721–1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has received support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions grant agreement No. 765408 (COUPLED, http://coupled-itn.eu) and from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant agreement No. 677140 (MIDLAND, https://erc-midland.earth). This work contributes to the Global Land Programme (www.glp.earth).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Kuemmerle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuemmerle, T., Kastner, T., Meyfroidt, P., Qin, S. (2019). Conservation Telecouplings. In: Friis, C., Nielsen, J.Ø. (eds) Telecoupling. Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11105-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11105-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11104-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11105-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics