Abstract
Seaquist and Johansson describe how network analysis can be used to operationalise the telecoupling framework. Starting with the building blocks of a network model, they demonstrate how network analysis can be used to clarify understandings about the effects of globalisation on land system change. Key metrics are presented and exemplified in an accessible manner, each focussing on local, community, and global levels of analysis. The toolbox rounds off with reflections on some of the challenges researchers face for operationalising the telecoupling framework with network analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barabási, Albert-Lázló, and Réka Albert. 1999. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science 286 (5439): 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509.
Bergmann, Luke, and David O’Sullivan. 2018. Re-Imagining GIScience for Relational Spaces. The Canadian Geographer 62 (1): 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12405.
Bodin, Örjan, and Maria Tengö. 2012. Disentangling Intangible Socio-Ecological Systems. Global Environmental Change 22 (2): 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005.
Brintrup, Alexandra M., and Anna Ledwoch. 2018. Supply Network Science: Emergence of a New Perspective on a Classical Field. Chaos 28 (3): 033120. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5010766.
Eakin, Hallie, Ruth DeFries, Suzi Kerr, Eric F. Lambin, Jianguo Liu, Peter J. Marcotullio, Peter Messerli, Anette Reenberg, Ximena Rueda, Simon R. Swaffield, Birka Wicke, and Karl Zimmerer. 2014. Significance of Telecoupling for Exploration of Land-Use Change. In Rethinking Global Land Use in an Urban Era, ed. Karen C. Seto and Anette Reenberg, 141–162. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Friis, Cecilie, and Jonas Ø. Nielsen. 2017a. On the System. Boundary Choices, Implications and Solutions in Telecoupling Land Use Change Research. Sustainability 9 (6): 974. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060974.
———. 2017b. Land Use Change in a Telecoupled World: The Relevance and Applicability of the Telecoupling Framework in the Case of Banana Plantation Expansion in Laos. Ecology and Society 22 (4): 30. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09480-220430.
Konar, Megan, Carole Dalin, Samir Suweis, Naota Hanasaki, Andrea Rinaldo, and Ignacio Rodriquez-Iturbe. 2011. Water for Food: The Global Virtual Water Trade Network. Water Resources Research 47: W05520. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010307.
Landmatrix.org. 2018 Accessed August 31, 2018. https://landmatrix.org/en/get-the-idea/web-transnational-deals.
Lazarus, Eli D. 2014. Land Grabbing as a Driver of Environmental Change. Area 46 (1): 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12072.
Liu, Jianguo, Vanessa Hull, Mateus Batistella, Ruth DeFries, Thomas Dietz, Feng Fu, Thomas W. Hertel, R. Cesar Izaurralde, Eric F. Lambin, Shuxin Li, Luiz A. Martinelli, William J. McConnell, Emilio F. Moran, Rosamond Naylor, Zhiyun Ouyang, Karen R. Polenske, Anette Reenberg, Gilberto de Miranda Rocha, Cynthia S. Simmons, Peter H. Verburg, Peter M. Vitousek, Fusuo Zhang, and Chunquan Zhu. 2013. Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World. Ecology and Society 18 (2): 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226.
Munroe, Darla K., Kendra McSweeney, Jeffrey L. Olson, and Becky Mansfield. 2014. Using Economic Geography to Re-Invigorate Land-Change Science. Geoforum 52: 12–21.
Newman, Mark E.J. 2010. Networks: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Seaquist, Jonathan W., Emma L. Johansson, and Kimberly A. Nicholas. 2014. Architecture of the Global Land Acquisition System: Applying the Tools of Network Science to Identify Key Vulnerabilities. Environmental Research Letters 9 (11): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/114006.
Silk, Matthew J., Darren P. Croft, Richard J. Delahay, David J. Hodgson, Mike Boots, Nicola Weber, and Robbie A. McDonald. 2017. Using Social Network Measures in Wildlife Disease Ecology, Epidemiology, and Management. Bioscience 67 (3): 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw175.
Telesford, Qawi K., Sean L. Simpson, Jonathan H. Burdette, Satoru Hayasaka, and Paul J. Laurienti. 2011. The Brain as a Complex System: Using Network Science as a Tool for Understanding the Brain. Brain Connectivity 1 (4): 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2011.0055.
Trase. 2018. A Vision for Trase: 2016–2020. Stockholm Environment Institute and Global Canopy Programme. Accessed August 30, 2018. http://resources.trase.earth/documents/Trase-vision-for-2020.pdf.
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to LUCID (Lund University Centre of Excellence for Integration of Social and Natural Dimensions of Sustainability) for partial support. LUCID is a Linnaeus Centre of Excellence at Lund University funded by the Swedish Research Council Formas (Grant 259-2008-1718).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seaquist, J.W., Johansson, E.L. (2019). Toolbox: Operationalising Telecoupling with Network Analysis. In: Friis, C., Nielsen, J.Ø. (eds) Telecoupling. Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11105-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11105-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11104-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11105-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)