Abstract
Although the American legal system does not statutorily permit differential civil and criminal trial outcomes on the basis of gender, empirical observations of the effects of gender on trial outcomes are ample yet mixed. For several decades, legal actors have attempted to diminish the effects of gender in the courtroom through Supreme Court rulings, presidential policies, legislation, and modification of language in legal documents. Social scientific research suggests that implicit and explicit processes likely affect how the gender of legal actors (e.g., defendants, victims) relates to trial outcomes. This chapter first discusses a variety of laws and policies designed to curtail gender bias generally (e.g., in employment settings) and in the trial process specifically. Next, the chapter synthesizes empirical research that demonstrates the relationship between gender and trial process and outcomes. This synthesis of the psychological research includes specific emphasis on the gender of five primary legal actors: victims, defendants, attorneys, experts, and legal decision-makers. Then, the chapter offers psychological mechanisms that explain why the gender of legal actors (e.g., jurors, witnesses) might relate to trial outcomes. We include overarching theoretical psychological explanations for the observed effects of gender using the symbolic interaction framework and the influence of gender roles and stereotypes . Finally, we identify deficits in the existing research on the relationship between gender and the trial process, suggesting topics for future empirical examination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrams, D. S., & Yoon, A. H. (2007). The luck of the draw: Using random case assignment to investigate attorney ability. The University of Chicago Law Review, 74, 1145–1177. https://doi.org/10.2307/20141859.
Abramson, R. P., Goldberg, P. A., Greenberg, J. H., & Abramson, L. M. (1979). The talking platypus phenomenon: Competency ratings as a function of sex and professional status. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1977.tb00494.x.
Adler, P. A., Kless, S. J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65, 169–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112807.
Alvarez, L., & Buckley, C. (2013, July 13). Zimmerman is acquitted in Trayvon Martin killing. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/14/us/george-zimmerman-verdict-trayvon-martin.html?mcubz=0.
Alver, F., & Caglar, S. (2015). The impact of symbolic interactionism on research studies about communication science. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 8, 479–484.
American Bar Association. (2018). A current glance at women in the law. ABA Commission on Women in the Profession. Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/women/a-current-glance-at-women-in-the-law-jan-2018.pdf
Anwar, S., Bayer, P., & Hjalmarsson, R. (2017). A jury of her peers: The impact of the first female jurors on criminal convictions. The Economic Journal, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12562.
Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., & Fisher, B. S. (2002). Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap? Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(01)00127-1.
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.
Batchelder, J. S., Koski, D. D., & Byxbe, F. R. (2004). Women’s hostility toward women in rape trials: Testing the intra-female gender hostility thesis. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885871.
Beckham, C. M., Spray, B. J., & Pietz, C. A. (2007). Jurors’ locus of control and defendants’ attractiveness in death penalty sentencing. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 285–298. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.3.285-298.
Bennett, R. E., Gottesman, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cerullo, F. (1993). Influence of behavior perceptions and gender on teachers’ judgments of students’ academic skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.347.
Bickle, G. S., & Peterson, R. D. (1991). The impact of gender-based family roles on criminal sentencing. Social Problems, 38, 372–394. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1991.38.3.03a00050.
Birnbaum, E. (2018, September 25). Republicans hire female attorney to handle Kavanaugh, Ford questioning. The Hill. Retrieved from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408306-republicans-hire-female-attorney-to-handle-kavanaugh-ford-questioning-report.
Blais, J., & Forth, A. (2014). Potential labeling effects: Influence of psychopathy diagnosis, defendant age, and defendant gender on mock jurors’ decisions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 116–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.749473.
Blumer, H. (1973). A note on symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review, 38, 797–800.
Bodenhausen, G. V. (1988). Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.726.
Bottoms, B. L. (1993). Individual differences in perceptions of child sexual assault victims. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony (pp. 229–261). New York, NY: Guilford.
Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children’s credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(8), 702–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00608.x.
Bottoms, B. L., Golding, J. M., Stevenson, M. C., Wiley, T. R. A., & Yozwiak, J. A. (2007). A review of factors affecting jurors’ decisions in child sexual abuse cases. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for events (Vol. 1, pp. 509–543). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Bottoms, B. L., Peter-Hagene, L. C., Stevenson, M. C., Wiley, T. A., Mitchell, T. S., & Goodman, G. S. (2014). Explaining gender differences in jurors’ reactions to child sexual assault cases. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 32, 789–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2147.
Boyd, C. L. (2016). Representation on the courts? The effects of trial judges’ sex and race. Political Research Quarterly, 69, 788–799. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44018057.
Boyd, C. L., Epstein, L., & Martin, A. D. (2010). Untangling the causal effects of sex on judging. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 389–411.
Braden-Maguire, J., Sigal, J., & Perrino, C. S. (2005). Battered women who kill: Variables affecting simulated jurors’ verdicts. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-7801-0.
Brenner, P. S., Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (2014). The causal ordering of prominence and salience in identity theory: An empirical examination. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272513518337.
Brodsky, S. L., Griffin, M. P., & Cramer, R. J. (2010). The witness credibility scale: An outcome measure for expert witness research. Behavioral Science & The Law, 28, 892–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.917.
Brown, R. L., & Campbell, S. (1997). How the public views female and black attorneys. Arkansas Law Review, 32, 22–31.
Burczyk, K., & Standing, L. (1989). Attitudes towards rape victims: Effects of victim status, sex of victim, and sex of rater. Social Behavior and Personality, 17, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1989.17.1.1.
Carson, L. (2008). Lay perceptions of an expert witness in a sexual discrimination in the workplace case. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5, 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.81.
Chapman, E. N., Kaatz, A., & Carnes, M. (2013). Physicians and implicit bias: How doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28, 1504–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2441-1.
Chew, P. K. (2017). Comparing the effects of judges’ gender and arbitrators’ gender in sex discrimination cases and why it matters. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 32, 195–218.
Clark, J., & Jackson, C. (2018, January 29). Global attitudes toward transgender people. Ipsos. Retrieved from https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/global-attitudes-toward-transgender-people.
Cochran, J. K., & Sanders, B. A. (2009). The gender gap in death penalty support: An exploratory study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.09.001.
Collins, T. A., Dumas, T. L., & Moyer, L. P. (2017). Intersecting disadvantages: Race, gender, and age discrimination among attorneys. Social Science Quarterly, 98, 16342–16358. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12376.
Coons, J. V., & Espinoza, R. K. E. (2018). An examination of aversive heterosexism in the courtroom: Effects of defendants’ sexual orientation and attractiveness, and juror gender on legal decision making. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 5, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000253.
Corley, C. J., Cernkovich, S., & Giordano, P. (1989). Sex and the likelihood of sanction. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 80(2), 540–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/1143804.
Couch, J. V., & Sigler, J. N. (2002). Gender of an expert witness and the jury verdict. The Psychological Record, 52, 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395430.
Cox, J., & Kopkin, M. R. (2016). Defendant and victim sex, sexism, and decision making in an ambiguous assault case. Women & Criminal Justice, 26, 381–393.
Crew, B. (1991). Sex differences in criminal sentencing: Chivalry or patriarchy. Justice Quarterly, 8(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829100090911.
Czapanskiy, K. (1993). Domestic violence, the family, and the lawyering process: Lessons from studies on gender bias in the courts. Family Law Quarterly, 27, 247–277. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25739935.
Daftary-Kapur, T., O’Connor, M., & Mechanic, M. (2014). Gender-intrusive questioning: A survey of expert witnesses. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 32, 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2114.
Daly, K., & Stubbs, J. (2006). Feminist engagement with restorative justice. Theoretical Criminology, 10, 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480606059980.
Davies, M. (2000). Male sexual assault victims: A selective review of the literature and implications for support services. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00043-4.
Davies, M., Walker, J., Archer, J., & Pollard, P. (2013). The scripting of male and female rape. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 5, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/17596591311313663.
Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes, 2, 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276.
Denov, M. (2004). The long-term effects of child sexual abuse by female perpetrators: A qualitative study of male and female victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1137–1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504269093.
Diamond, S. S. (2013, July 15). Zimmerman trial: Time to reconsider six-member jury. Miami Herald. Retrieved from https://www.miamiherald.com/2013/07/14/3497719/zimmerman-trial-time-to-reconsider.html.
Dunlap, E. E., Hodell, E. C., Golding, J. M., & Wasarhaley, N. E. (2012). Mock jurors’ perception of stalking: The impact of gender and expressed fear. Sex Roles, 66, 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9970-z.
Dunlap, E. E., Lynch, K. R., Jewell, J. A., Wasarhaley, N. E., & Golding, J. M. (2015). Participant gender, stalking myth acceptance, and gender role stereotyping in perceptions of intimate partner stalking: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.951648.
Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979).
Ellison, L., & Munro, V. E. (2009). Of “normal sex” and “real rape”: Exploring the use of socio-sexual scripts in (mock) jury deliberation. Social & Legal Studies, 18, 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663909339083.
Erez, E. (1992). Dangerous men, evil women: Gender and parole decision-making. Justice Quarterly, 9, 393–418.
Farhang, S., & Wawro, G. (2004). Institutional dynamics on the US court of appeals: Minority representation under panel decision making. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 20, 299–330.
Fischer, G. J. (1997). Gender effects on individual verdicts and on mock jury verdicts in a simulated acquaintance rape trial. Sex Roles, 36, 491–501.
Forsterlee, L., Fox, G. B., Forsterlee, R., & Ho, R. (2004). The effects of a victim impact statement and gender on juror information processing in a criminal trial: Does the punishment fit the crime? Australian Psychologist, 39, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060410001660353.
Francis, B. (2016). The female human trafficker in the criminal justice system: A test of the chivalry hypothesis (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
Gavin, J., & Scott, A. J. (2016). The influence of the sex of and prior relationship between the perpetrator and victim on perceptions of stalking: A qualitative analysis. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23, 716–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1142933.
Gilbert, P. R. (2002). Discourses of female violence and societal gender stereotypes. Violence Against Women, 8, 1271–1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780102762478019.
Glenn v. Brumby et al., 724 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (N.D. Ga. 2010).
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
Golding, J. M., Bradshaw, G. S., Dunlap, E. E., & Hodell, E. C. (2007). The impact of mock jury gender composition on deliberations and conviction rates in a child sexual assault trial. Child Maltreatment, 12, 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559506298995.
Gottschall, J. (1983). Carter’s judicial appointments: The influence of affirmative action and merit selection on voting on the U.S. courts of appeals. Judicature, 67, 165–173.
Greenwald, A., McGhee, D., & Schwartz, J. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
Groth, A. N., & Burgess, A. W. (1980). Male rape offenders and victims. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 806–810. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.137.7.806.
Grubb, A., & Turner, E. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002.
Gutheil, T. G., & Simon, R. I. (2005). Narcissistic dimensions of expert witness practice. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33, 55–58.
Haegerich, T. M., & Bottoms, B. L. (2000). Empathy and jurors’ decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 421–448. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1394458.
Hahn, P. W., & Clayton, S. D. (1996). The effects of attorney presentation style, attorney gender, and juror gender on juror decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499040.
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times are a-changing…or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081.
Haney, C. (2005). Death by design: Capital punishment as a social psychological system. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Henning, K., & Feder, L. (2005). Criminal prosecution of domestic violence offenses: An investigation of factors predictive of court outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 612–642.
Herzog, S., & Oreg, S. (2008). Chivalry and the moderating effect of ambivalent sexism: Individual differences in crime seriousness judgments. Law & Society Review, 42, 45–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00334.x.
Hodell, E. C., Wasarhaley, N. E., Lynch, K. R., & Golding, J. M. (2014). Mock juror gender biases and perceptions of self-defense claims in intimate partner homicide. Journal of Family Violence, 29, 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9609-2.
Hodgson, S., & Pryor, B. (1984). Sex discrimination in the courtroom: Attorney’s gender and credibility. Psychological Reports, 55, 483–486. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1984.55.2.483.
Holliday, M. E. (2018, July 19). Federal appeals court continues to block Trump transgender military ban. Jurist. Retrieved from https://www.jurist.org.
Jackson, B., McDermott, C., & Miller, M. K. (2018). Gender, interrogated: Prejudice, gender performance, and bias against gender-variant suspects. Manuscript in preparation.
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994).
Jones, C. S., & Kaplan, M. F. (2003). The effects of racially stereotypical crimes on juror decision-making and information-processing strategies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2501_1.
Judson, S. S., Johnson, D. M., & Perez, A. L. (2013). Perceptions of adult sexual coercion as a function of victim gender. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030448.
Kaempf, A. C., Baxter, P., Packer, I. K., & Pinals, D. A. (2015). Gender and the experience of mental health expert witness testimony. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 43, 52–59.
Karnoski v. Trump 2:17-cv-01297-MJP (2017).
Kennedy, C. W., & Camden, C. (1983). Interruptions and nonverbal gender differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986997.
Kirshenbaum, J. M., Miller, M. K., Cramer, R. J., Neal, T. M. S., & Wilsey, C. N. (2018). Development and validation of a general legal moral disengagement scale. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Memphis, TN.
Kovera, M. B., Levy, R. J., Borgida, E., & Penrod, S. D. (1994). Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 653–674.
Lambert, E. G., Baker, D. N., Elechi, O. O., Jiang, S., Khondaker, M. I., Pasupuleti, S., et al. (2016). Gender and cultural differences on death penalty support and views among Indian and U.S. college students. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 28, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2015.1015195.
Larson, B. A., & Brodsky, S. L. (2010). When cross-examination offends: How men and women assess intrusive questioning of male and female expert witnesses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00599.x.
Larson, B. A., & Brodsky, S. L. (2014). Assertive women as expert witnesses: A study of assertive and defensive responses in male and female experts. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 32(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2116.
Lorber, J. (2007). “Night to his day”: The social construction of gender. In V. Taylor, N. Whittier, & L. J. Rupp (Eds.), Feminist frontiers (7th ed., pp. 41–56). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Mackelprang, E., & Becker, J. V. (2017). Beauty and the eye of the beholder: Gender and attractiveness affect judgments in teacher sex offense cases. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 29, 375–395.
Maeder, E. M., McManus, L. A., McLaughlin, K. J., Yamamoto, S., & Stewart, H. (2016). Jurors’ perceptions of scientific testimony: The role of gender and testimony complexity in trials involving DNA evidence. Cogent Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1264657.
Maeder, E. M., McManus, L. A., Yamamoto, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2018). A test of gender-crime congruency on mock juror decision-making. Cogent Psychology, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1461543.
Massie, T., Johnson, S. W., & Gubala, S. M. (2002). The impact of gender and race in the decisions of judges on the United States courts of appeals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01552.x.
McCall, G. J. (2006). Symbolic interaction. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 1–23). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
McCauley, M. R., & Parker, J. F. (2001). When will a child be believed? The impact of the victim’s age and juror’s gender on children’s credibility and verdict in a sexual-abuse case. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00224-1.
McCoy, M. L., & Gray, J. M. (2007). The impact of defendant gender and relationship to victim on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1578–1593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00228.x.
McKimmie, B. M., Newton, S. A., Schuller, R. A., & Terry, D. J. (2013). It’s not what she says, it’s how she says it: The influence of language complexity and cognitive load on the persuasiveness of expert testimony. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20, 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2012.727068.
McKimmie, B. M., Newton, C. J., Terry, D. J., & Schuller, R. A. (2004). Jurors’ responses to expert witness testimony: The effects of gender stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204043724.
Mead, G. H. (1929). The philosophy of the present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meaux, L. T., Cox, J., & Kopkin, M. R. (2018). Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decision: Juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1474817.
Memon, A., & Shuman, D. W. (1998). Juror perception of experts in civil disputes: The role of race and gender. Law and Psychology Review, 22, 179–196.
Mitchell, D., Hirschman, R., & Hall, G. C. N. (1999). Attributions of victim responsibility, pleasure, and trauma in male rape. The Journal of Sex Research, 36, 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909552009.
Mossière, A., & Dalby, J. T. (2008). The influence of gender and age in mock juror decision-making. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v4i4.440.
Mossière, A., Maeder, E. M., & Pica, E. (2016). Racial composition of couples in battered spouse syndrome cases: A look at juror perceptions and decisions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 2867–2890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516632355.
Myers, B., Lynn, S. J., & Arbuthnot, J. (2002). Victim impact testimony and juror judgments: The effects of harm information and witness demeanor. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2393–2412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01869.x.
Najdowski, C. J., & Bottoms, B. L. (2015). Effects of jurors’ gender and attitudes toward intellectual disability on judgments in cases involving disabled juvenile defendants. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 26, 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2015.1017592.
Neal, T. (2014). Women as expert witnesses: A review of the literature. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 32, 164–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2113.
Neal, T. S., & Brodsky, S. L. (2008). Expert witness credibility as a function of eye contact behavior and gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1515–1526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808325405.
Neal, T. S., Guadagno, R. E., Eno, C. A., & Brodsky, S. L. (2012). Warmth and competence on the witness stand: Implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 40, 488–497.
Nemeth, C., Endicott, J., & Wachtler, J. (1976). From the ‘50s to the ‘70s: Women in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 39, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033495.
Newcombe, N., & Arnkoff, D. B. (1979). Effects of speech style and sex of speaker on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1293–1303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1293.
Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1980.4288749.
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, 523 U.S. 75 (1998).
O’Neil, K. M., Patry, M. W., & Penrod, S. D. (2004). Exploring the effects of attitudes toward the death penalty on capital sentencing verdicts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10, 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.10.4.443.
O’Neil, M. E. (1999). The gender gap argument: Exploring the disparity of sentencing women to death. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 25, 213–244.
Orcutt, J. D., & Harvey, L. K. (1985). Deviance, rule-breaking and male dominance in conversation. Symbolic Interaction, 8, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1985.8.1.15.
Osborn, K., Davis, J. P., Button, S., & Foster, J. (2018). Juror decision making in acquaintance and marital rape: The influence of clothing, alcohol, and preexisting stereotypical attitudes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518768566.
Parrott, C. T., Neal, T. S., Wilson, J. K., & Brodsky, S. L. (2015). Differences in expert witness knowledge: Do mock jurors notice and does it matter? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 43, 69–81.
Peresie, J. L. (2004). Female judges matter: Gender and collegial decision making in the federal appellate courts. Yale Law Journal, 114, 1759–1793.
Phillips v. Martin Marietta, 400 U.S. 542 (1971).
Plumm, K. M., & Terrance, C. A. (2009). Battered women who kill: The impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom. Violence Against Women, 15, 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208329145.
Pollak, O. (1961). The criminality of women. New York, NY: Barnes.
Pozzulo, J. D., Dempsey, J., Maeder, E., & Allen, L. (2010). The effects of victim gender, defendant gender, and defendant age on juror decision making. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809344173.
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989).
Pronin, E., & Kugler, M. B. (2006). Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.011.
Quas, J. A., Bottoms, B. L., Haegerich, T. M., & Nysse-Carris, K. L. (2002). Effects of victim, defendant, and juror gender on decisions in a child sexual assault case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1993–2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02061.x.
Quinones, S. (2012, April 25). EEOC rules job protections also apply to transgender people. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2012/apr/25/local/la-me-transgender-20120425.
Reed, K., & Bornstein, B. H. (2018). Objection! Psychological perspectives on jurors’ perceptions of in-court attorney objections. South Dakota Law Review, 63, 1–43.
Richards, T. N., Bjerregaard, B. E., Cochran, J., Smith, M. D., & Fogel, S. J. (2016). Predictors of death sentencing for minority, equal, and majority female juries in capital murder trials. Women & Criminal Justice, 26, 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2015.1115802.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
Rueckert, L., & Naybar, N. (2008). Gender differences in empathy: The role of the right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 67, 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.002.
Saavedra, L., Cameira, M., Rebelo, A. S., & Sebastião, C. (2017). Gender norms in Portuguese college students’ judgments in familial homicides: Bad men and mad women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515585542.
Salerno, J. M., Phalen, H. J., Reyes, R. N., & Schweitzer, N. J. (2018). Closing with emotion: The differential impact of male versus female attorneys expressing anger in court. Law and Human Behavior, 42, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000292.
Sassman v. Brown and Beard, 99 F. Supp.3d 1223 (2015).
Schuller, R. A. (1992). The impact of battered woman syndrome evidence on jury decision processes. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 597–620.
Schuller, R. A., & Cripps, J. (1998). Expert evidence pertaining to battered women: The impact of gender of expert and timing of testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025772604721.
Schuller, R. A., Terry, D., & McKimmie, B. (2001). The impact of an expert’s gender on jurors’ decisions. Law and Psychology Review, 25, 59–79.
Schuller R. A., Terry, D., & McKimmie, B. (2005). The impact of expert testimony on jurors’ decisions: Gender of the expert and testimony complexity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(6), 1266–1280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02170.x.
Schutte, J. W., & Hosch, H. M. (1997). Gender differences in sexual assault verdicts: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 759–772.
Segal, J. A. (2000). Representative decision making on the federal bench: Clinton’s district court appointees. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290005300107.
Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 582 U.S. (2017).
Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207.
Sigal, J., Braden-Maguire, J., Hayden, M., & Mosley, N. (1985). The effect of presentation style and sex of lawyer on jury decision-making behavior. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 22, 13–19.
Smith, R. E., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551401.
Sommer, S., Reynolds, J. J., & Kehn, A. (2015). Mock juror perceptions of rape victims: Impact of case characteristics and individual differences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515581907.
Songer, D. R., Davis, S., & Haire, S. (1994). A reappraisal of diversification in the federal courts: Gender effects in the courts of appeals. Journal of Politics, 56, 425–439.
Spencer, K. B., Charbonneau, A. K., & Glaser, J. (2016). Implicit bias and policing. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12210.
Stanko, E. A., & Hobdell, K. (1993). Assault on men: Masculinity and male victimization. The British Journal of Criminology, 33(3), 400–415. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23637803.
Starr, S. (2012). Estimating gender disparities in federal criminal cases. American Law and Economics Review, 17, 127–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahu010.
Steblay, N., Hosch, H. M., Culhane, S. E., & McWethy, A. (2006). The impact on juror verdicts of judicial instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 469–492.
Steffensmeier, D., & Hebert, C. (1999). Women and men policymakers: Does the judge’s gender affect sentencing of criminal defendants? Social Forces, 77, 1163–1196. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/77.3.1163.
Steury, E. H., & Frank, N. (1990). Gender bias and pretrial release: More pieces of the puzzle. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(90)90057-Id.
Strub, T., & McKimmie, B. M. (2016). Sugar and spice and all things nice: The role of gender stereotypes in jurors’ perceptions of criminal defendants. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23, 487–498.
Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 16–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2786972.
Suarez, E., & Gadalla, T. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2010–2035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354503.
Supriya, S., Sorensen, T., & Oaxaca, R. L. (2007). Do you receive a lighter prison sentence because you are a woman? An economic analysis of federal criminal sentencing guidelines. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 2870, 1–51.
Swenson, R. A., Nash, D. L., & Roos, D. C. (1984). Source credibility and perceived expertness of testimony in a simulated child-custody case. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15, 891–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.15.6.891.
Szmer, J. J., Kaheny, E. B., Sarver, T., & DeCamillis, M. (2013). The impact of attorney gender on decision making in the United States Courts of Appeals. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 34, 72–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2013.747898.
Szmer, J. J., Sarver, T. A., & Kaheny, E. B. (2010). Have we come a long way, baby? The influence of attorney gender on Supreme Court decision making. Politics & Gender, 6. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x09990493.
Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975).
Terpstra, D., Honorée, A., & Friedl, J. (2013). The influence of the gender and race of the judge and the type of discrimination charge on court case outcomes. International Journal of Law and Management, 55, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2012-0006.
Terrance, C. A., Matheson, K., & Spanos, N. P. (2000). Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 207–229.
The American Bench. (2018). 2018 U.S. state court women judges. National Association of Women Judges. Forester-Long, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.nawj.org/statistics/2018-us-state-court-women-judges
The Florida Bar. (2016). How to write and use jury instructions in criminal cases. In The Florida Bar Continuing Legal Education (Ed.), Florida standard jury instructions in criminal cases. New York: LexusNexis.
Tillyer, R., Hartley, R. D., & Ward, J. T. (2015). Differential treatment of female defendants: Does criminal history moderate the effect of gender on sentence length in federal narcotics cases? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814560624.
United States Census Bureau. (2000). Section 13: Labor force, employment, and earnings. Statistical abstract of the United States: 2000 (120th Edition). Retrieved from https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2001/compendia/statab/120ed/tables/sec13.pdf.
United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996).
Vasterling, C. G. (1989). Child custody modification under the uniform marriage and divorce act: A statute to end the tug-of-war? Washington University Law Review, 67, 923–948.
Villemur, N. K., & Hyde, J. S. (1983). Effects of sex of defense attorney, sex of juror, and age and attractiveness of the victim on mock juror decision making in a rape case. Sex Roles, 9, 879–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289961.
Visher, C. A. (1983). Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry. Criminology, 21(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00248.x.
Vondergeest, L., Honts, C. R., & Devitt, M. K. (1993). Effects of juror and expert witness gender on jurors’ perceptions of an expert witness. Modern Psychological Studies, 1, 1–6. https://scholar.utc.edu/mps/vol1/iss2/2.
Voss, J. F., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2001). Narrative structure, information certainty, emotional content, and gender as factors in a pseudo jury decision-making task. Discourse Process, 32, 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651599.
Vrij, A., & Firmin, H. R. (2001). Beautiful thus innocent? The impact of defendants’ and victims’ physical attractiveness and participants’ rape beliefs on impression formation in alleged rape cases. International Review of Victimology, 8, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975800100800301.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.
Wilczynski, A. (1997). Mad or bad? Child-killers, gender and the courts. The British Journal of Criminology, 37, 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014178.
Williams, M. R., Demuth, S., & Holocomb, J. E. (2007). Understanding the influence of victim gender in death penalty cases: The importance of victim race, sex-related victimization, and jury decision making. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 45, 865–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00095.x.
Witt, G. M., & Wood, W. (2010). Self-regulation of gendered behavior in everyday life. Sex Roles, 62, 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9761-y.
Witt, S. D. (2000). The influence of peers on children’s socialization to gender roles. Early Child Development and Care, 162, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443001620101.
Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (2004). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee’s allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.144.2.207-217.
Yamamoto, S., & Maeder, E. M. (2017). A case of culture: Defendant gender and juror decision-making. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 3090–3110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515596976.
Youngquist, J. (2009). The effect of interruptions and dyad gender combination on perceptions of interpersonal dominance. Communication Studies, 60, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970902834874.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Brielle Jackson for their help in preparing this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Livingston, T.N., Rerick, P.O., Miller, M.K. (2019). Psychological Explanations of How Gender Relates to Perceptions and Outcomes at Trial. In: Bornstein, B., Miller, M. (eds) Advances in Psychology and Law. Advances in Psychology and Law, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11042-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11042-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11041-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11042-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)