Advertisement

The French Jespersen’s Cycle and Negative Concord

  • Marie LabelleEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT, volume 95)

Abstract

French is a classical example of Jespersen’s cycle. The term cycle suggests that the endpoint of the cycle is identical to the initial point. By discussing the various historical changes underlying the French cycle, we will show that the evolution is more spiral-like than cyclic: the language that seems to have completed the cycle has properties different from that of the initial language. We will also argue that, while a number of authors view the evolution as linear, going from Old French to Standard French, then to Colloquial French, Quebec French illustrating the end of the cycle, the facts rather suggest that a split between two dialects had occurred during the 16th century One dialect corresponds to Standard French, the other one led to Quebec French. We will propose an analysis of the facts.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the reviewers of this paper for their comments on previous versions.

References

  1. Ayres-Bennett, Wendy. 1994. Negative evidence: Or another look at the non-use of ne in 17th century French. French Studies 48 (1): 63–85.Google Scholar
  2. Baunaz, Lena. 2011. The grammar of French quantification. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Beghelli, Filippo. 1997. The syntax of distributivity and pair-list readings. In Ways of scope taking, ed. Ana Szabolcsi, 379–408. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. den Besten, Hans. 1986. Double negation and the genesis of Afrikaans. In Substrata versus universals in Creole languages. Papers from the Amsterdam Creole workshop, April 1985, ed. Peter Muysken and Norval Smith, 185–230. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  5. Boerm, Michael Lloyd. 2008. Pourquoi ‘Pas’: The socio-historical linguistics behind the grammaticalization of the French negative marker. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  6. Bouvier, Yves-Ferdinand. 2002. A featural account of polarity phenomena. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Genève, no. L 498. http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:553.
  7. Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dagnac, Anne. 2015. ‘Pas’, ‘mie’, ‘point’ et autres riens: de la négation verbale en picard. In La négation: études linguistiques pragmatiques et didactiques, actes du colloque franco-roumain du 15–17 mai 2013, ed. Jan Goes and Mariana Pitar. Timişoara, Arras: Artois Presses Université. https://hal-univ-tlse2.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00988781.
  9. Dagnac, Anne, and Heather Burnett. 2016. Concordance négative optionnelle: contrastes forts et faibles entre picard et québécois. In Proceedings of the 5th Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. Tours, France: Université François Rabelais. http://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2016/05/shsconf_cmlf2016_13003.pdf.
  10. Daoust-Blais, Denise. 1975. L’influence de la négation sur certains indéfinis en français québécois. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  11. Déprez, Viviane. 1999. The roots of negative concord in French and French based Creoles. In Language creation and language change: Creole, diachrony and development, ed. Michel DeGraff, 375–428. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Déprez, Viviane. 2000. Parallel (a)symmetries and the internal structure of negative expressions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18 (2): 253–342.Google Scholar
  13. Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria, and Mireille Tremblay. 1996. Configurations et interprétation: les morphèmes de négation. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 25: 27–52.Google Scholar
  14. Dufter, Andreas, and Elisabeth Stark. 2007. La linguistique variationnelle et les changements linguistiques ‘mal compris’: le cas du ne de négation. In Études sur le changement linguistique en français, ed. Bernard Combettes and Christiane Marchello-Nizia, 115–128. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar
  15. Ernst, Gerhard. 1985. Gesprochenes Franzosisch zu Beginn des 17. Jahrhunderts. Direkte Rede in Jean Héroards “Histoire particulière de Louis XIII” (1605–1610). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  16. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2006. N-words and negative concord. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. III, chapter 45, ed. Martin Everaert, Henk Van Riemsdijk, Rob Goedemans, and Bart Hollebrandse, 327–391. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Héroard, Jean. 1989. Journal de Jean Héroard, 1601–1628, 2 vol., ed. Madeleine Foisil. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  18. Hirschbühler, Paul, and Marie Labelle. 2003. Residual Tobler-Mussafia effects in French dialects. In Romance linguistics: Theory and acquisition, ed. Ana Maria Pérez-Leroux and Yves Roberge, 149–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  19. Hirschbühler, Paul, and Marie Labelle. 2006. Enclisis and proclisis of object pronouns at the turn of the 17th century in the speech of the future Louis XIIIth. In Historical Romance linguistics: Retrospective and perspectives, ed. Deborah Arteaga and Randall Gess, 187–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  20. Ingham, Richard. 2011. Ne-drop and indefinites in Anglo-Norman and Middle English. In The evolution of negation: Beyond the Jespersen cycle, ed. Pierre Larrivée and Richard P. Ingham, 145–163. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  21. Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: A.F. Høst, 1966. Reprinted in Selected Writings of Otto Jespersen. London: Allen del Orwin, 1961.Google Scholar
  22. Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and contextual expressions, ed. Renate Bartsch, 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
  23. Kroch, Anthony. 2000. Syntactic change. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, 699–729. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Labelle, Marie. 2017. Negative concord in Quebec French. Probus 29 (2): 323–354.Google Scholar
  25. Labelle, Marie, and Maria Teresa Espinal. 2014. Diachronic changes in negative expressions: The case of French. Lingua 145: 194–225.Google Scholar
  26. Ladusaw, William A. 1992. Expressing negation. In Proceedings of the 2nd semantics and linguistic theory conference (SALT II), held May 1–3, 1992 at the Ohio State University. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 40, ed. Chris Barker and David Dowty, 237–259. Columbus, Ohio. journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/issue/view/81.
  27. Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Published in 1994 by Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Larrivée, Pierre. 2014. The continuity of the vernacular: The evolution of negative doubling in French. In The diachrony of negation, ed. Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Jacqueline Visconti, 235–256. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  29. Martineau, France. 2005. Perspectives sur le changement linguistique: aux sources du français canadien. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 50: 173–213.Google Scholar
  30. Martineau, France. 2009. Modeling change: A historical sociolinguistics perspective on French negation. In Corpus analysis and variation in linguistics, ed. Yuji Kawaguchi, Makoto Minegishi, and Jacques Durand. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  31. Martineau, France. 2011. Ne-absence in declarative and yes/no interrogative contexts: Some patterns of change. In The evolution of negation: Beyond the Jespersen cycle, ed. Pierre Larrivée and Richard P. Ingham, 179–207. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  32. Martineau, France, and Viviane Déprez. 2004. ‘Pas rien’/‘Pas aucun’ en français classique: variation dialectale et historique. Langue française 143: 33–47.Google Scholar
  33. Martineau, France, and Raymond Mougeon. 2003. Sociolinguistic research on the origins of ne deletion in European and Quebec French. Language 79 (1): 118–152.Google Scholar
  34. Martineau, France, and Marie-Thérèse Vinet. 2005. Microvariation in French negation markers: A historical perspective. In Grammaticalization and parametric variation, ed. Montserrat Battlori, Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo, and Francesc Roca, 194–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Meisner, Charlotte, Aurélia Robert-Tissot, and Elisabeth Stark. 2015. L’absence et la présence du NE de négation. In Encyclopédie grammaticale du français online. http://encyclogram.fr.
  36. Ménage, Gilles. 1675. Observations de Monsieur Ménage sur la langue française, Paris.Google Scholar
  37. Moritz, Luc, and Daniel Valois. 1994. Pied-piping and specifier-head agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 25 (4): 667–707.Google Scholar
  38. Muller, Claude. 1991. La négation en français. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
  39. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20 (3): 365–424.Google Scholar
  40. Price, Glanville. 1962. The negative particles pas, mie and point in French. Archivum Linguisticum 14: 14–34.Google Scholar
  41. Price, Glanville. 1978. L’interrogative sans ne. Studii şi cercetări lingvistice 29: 599–606.Google Scholar
  42. Price, Glanville. 1993. Pas (point) without ne in interrogative clauses. French Language Studies 3 (2): 191–195.Google Scholar
  43. Rowlett, Paul. 1998. Sentential negation in French. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. de Swart, Henriëtte, and Ivan A. Sag. 2002. Negation and negative concord in Romance. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (4): 373–417.Google Scholar
  45. Vance, Barbara S. 1997. Syntactic change in Medieval French: Verb-second and null subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  46. de Vaugelas, Claude Favre. 1647 Remarques sur la langue françoise. Fac-similé de l’édition originale, 1934. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
  47. Zeijlstra, Hedde H. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  48. Zeijlstra, Hedde H. 2010. On French negation. In Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. Iksoo Kwon, Hannah Pritchett, and Justin Spence, 447–458. Berkeley, CA: BLS. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000885.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations