Advertisement

The Syntax of Mirative Focus Fronting: Evidence from French

  • J.-Marc AuthierEmail author
  • Liliane Haegeman
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT, volume 95)

Abstract

Cruschina (2009, 2011) argues against the general claim (cf. Rizzi 1997) that focus fronting is possible only when associated with contrast and proposes, based on data from Sicilian and Sardinian, that corrective focus (CFoc) fronting and mirative focus (MFoc) fronting target distinct left periphery projections. One of the goals of this paper will be to provide independent evidence for this claim drawn from French, a language which we will show only allows MFoc fronting. A second goal will be to provide a much-needed semantic characterization of MFoc. We will show that while MFoc fronting constructions and wh-exclamatives pattern alike in terms of information structure, the former differ semantically from the latter in having what Nouwen and Chernilovskaya (2015) call an e-level rather than an i-level expressive content.

Keywords

e-level interpretation Expressive content Focus fronting i-level interpretation Left periphery Mirative focus 

References

  1. Abeillé, Anne, Danièle Godard, and Frédéric Sabio. 2008. Two types of NP preposing in French. In Proceedings of the 15th HPSG conference, ed. Stefan Müller, 306–324. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Authier, J.-Marc. 2011. A movement analysis of French modal ellipsis. Probus 23: 175–216.Google Scholar
  3. Authier, J.-Marc. 2013. Phase-edge features and the syntax of polarity particles. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 354–389.Google Scholar
  4. Authier J.-Marc, and Liliane Haegeman. 2015. French adverbial clauses, rescue by ellipsis and the truncation versus intervention debate. Probus 27: 33–71.Google Scholar
  5. Bayer, Josef. 2001. Asymmetry in emphatic topicalization. In Studia Grammatica 52: Adiatur Vox Sapientiae, ed. Caroline Féry and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 15–47. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Belletti, Adriana. 2009. Structures and strategies. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
  7. Benincà, Paola. 2001. The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In Current studies in Italian Syntax, ed. Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi, 39–64. Oxford: North Holland.Google Scholar
  8. Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 1996. Trois remarques sur l’ordre des mots de la langue parlée. Langue française 111: 109–117.Google Scholar
  9. Castroviejo Miró, Elena. 2008. Deconstructing exclamations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 7: 41–90.Google Scholar
  10. Chernilovskaya, Anna, and Rick Nouwen. 2012. On wh-exclamatives and noteworthiness. In Logic, language and meaning: Lectures notes in computer science, vol. 7218, ed. Maria Aloni, Vadim Kimmelman, Floris Roelofsen, Galit Sassoon, Kathrin Schulz, and Matthijs Westera, 271–280. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Chernilovskaya, Anna, Cleo Condoravdi, and Sven Lauer. 2012. On the discourse effects of wh-exclamatives. In Proceedings of the 30th West Coast conference on Formal linguistics, ed. Nathan Arnett and Ryan Bennett, 109–119. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
  12. Cinque, Guglielmo, and Luigi Rizzi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structure. In CISCL working papers, vol. 2, ed. Vincenzo Moscati. Siena: University of Siena.Google Scholar
  13. Cruschina, Silvio. 2009. The syntactic role of discourse-related features. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5: 15–30.Google Scholar
  14. Cruschina, Silvio. 2011. Discourse-related features and functional projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Jenny Doetjes, and Petra Sleeman. 2004. Dislocation. In Handbook of French semantics, ed. Francis Corblin and Henriëtte de Swart, 505–530. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Escribano, José Luis Rafael. 1991. Una teoría de la oracíón. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
  17. Frascarelli, Mara. 2010. Narrow focus, clefting and predicate inversion. Lingua 120: 2121–2147.Google Scholar
  18. Frascarelli, Mara, and Annarita Puglielli. 2007. Focus in the Force-Fin system: Information structure in embedded clauses. In Indiana University Linguistics Club working papers, vol. 13, ed. Kristopher Ebarb and Ken de Jong, 1–9. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  19. Garrett, Jordan. 2014. Which que is which?: A squib on reduplicative que complementizers in Iberian Spanish embedded clauses. In Indiana University Linguistics Club working papers, vol. 13, ed. Kristopher Ebarb and Ken de Jong, 1–9. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  20. Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 279–326.Google Scholar
  21. Gupton, Timothy. 2010. The syntax information structure interface: Subjects and clausal word order in Galician. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  22. Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2008. Types of focus in English. In Topic and focus: Cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation, ed. Chungmin Lee, Matthew Gordon, and Daniel Büring, 83–100. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Haegeman, Liliane. 2002. Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. Georgetown University Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 117–180.Google Scholar
  24. Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena and the composition of the left periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Haegeman, Liliane, André Meinuner, and Aleksandra Vercauteren. 2014. The architecture of it-clefts. Journal of Linguistics 50: 269–296.Google Scholar
  26. Hamblin, Charles Leonard. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53. Reprinted in Montague Grammar, ed. Barbara Partee, 247–259. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jiménez-Hernández, Àngel. 2015. Towards a typology of focus: Subject position and microvariation at the discourse-syntax interface. Ampersand 2:49–60.Google Scholar
  28. Kerleroux, Françoise, and Jean-Marie Marandin. 2001. L’ordre des mots. In Cahier Jean-Claude Milner, ed. Jean-Marie Marandin, 277–303. Paris: Verdier.Google Scholar
  29. Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic notions of information structure. In Interdisciplinary studies on information structure, vol. 6, ed. Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, and Manfred Krifka, 13–55. Potsdam: SFB 632.Google Scholar
  30. Lopez, Luis. 2009. A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. McCloskey, James. 2006. Questions and questioning in a local English. In Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics, ed. Rafaela Zanuttini, 87–123. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Morzycki, Marcin. 2009. Degree modification of gradable nouns: size adjectives and adnominal degree morphemes. Natural Language Semantics 17: 175–203.Google Scholar
  33. Nouwen, Rick, and Anna Chernilovskaya. 2015. Two types of wh-exclamatives. Linguistic Variation 15: 201–224.Google Scholar
  34. Ortega-Santos, Iván. 2013. Corrective focus at the right edge in Spanish. Lingua 131: 112–135.Google Scholar
  35. Ortiz de Urbina, Jon. 1999. Focus in Basque. In The Grammar of focus, ed. Georges Rebuschi and Laurice Tuller, 311–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  36. Paoli, Sandra. 2006. The fine structure of the left periphery: COMPs and subjects. Evidence from Romance. Lingua 117:1057–1079.Google Scholar
  37. Paoli, Sandra. 2009. Contrastiveness and new information: A new view on focus. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 34: 137–161.Google Scholar
  38. Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field. Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Prince, Ellen. 1981. Topicalization, Focus-movement, and Yiddish-movement: A pragmatic differentiation. In Proceedings of the seventh annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 249–264. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  40. Rett, Jessica. 2008. A degree account of exclamatives. In Proceedings of SALT XVIII, ed. Tova Friedman and Satoshi Ito, 601–618. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  41. Rett, Jessica. 2011. Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 34: 411–442.Google Scholar
  42. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  43. Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position ‘Int(errogative)’ in the left periphery of the clause. In Current studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, ed. Gugilelmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi, 287–296. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  44. Rizzi, Luigi. 2014. Some consequences of criterial freezing. In Functional structure from top to toe, the cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 9, ed. Peter Svenonius, 19–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  46. Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.Google Scholar
  47. Sabio, Frédéric. 1995. Micro-syntaxe et macro-syntaxe: L’exemple des “compléments antéposés” en français. Recherches sur le français parlé 13: 111–155. Publications de l’Université de Provence Aix-Marseille.Google Scholar
  48. Sabio, Frédéric. 2006. L’antéposition des compléments dans le français contemporain. Lingvisticae Investigationes 29: 173–182.Google Scholar
  49. Troberg, Michelle. 2004. Topic-comment resumptive pronouns in Modern French and Old and Middle French. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 133–156.Google Scholar
  50. Villa-García, Julio. 2012. Recomplementation and locality of movement in Spanish. Probus 24: 257–314.Google Scholar
  51. Zanuttini, Raffaella, and Paul Portner. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79: 39–81.Google Scholar
  52. Zaring, Laurie. 1992. Extensions of R-binding. In Theoretical analyses in Romance linguistics, ed. Christiane Laeufer and Terrell Morgan, 347–366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of French and Francophone StudiesPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of LinguisticsGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations