Skip to main content

Big Earth Data for Cultural Heritage in the Copernicus Era

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Remote Sensing for Archaeology and Cultural Landscapes

Part of the book series: Springer Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry ((SPRINGERREMO))

Abstract

Digital data is stepping in its golden age characterized by an increasing growth of both classical and emerging big earth data along with trans- and multidisciplinary methodological approaches and services addressed to the study, preservation and sustainable exploitation of cultural heritage (CH). The availability of new digital technologies has opened new possibilities, unthinkable only a few years ago for cultural heritage. The currently available digital data, tools and services with particular reference to Copernicus initiatives make possible to characterize and understand the state of conservation of CH for preventive restoration and opened up a frontier of possibilities for the discovery of archaeological sites from above and also for supporting their excavation, monitoring and preservation. The different areas of intervention require the availability and integration of rigorous information from different sources for improving knowledge and interpretation, risk assessment and management in order to make more successful all the actions oriented to the preservation of cultural properties. One of the biggest challenges is to fully involve the citizen also from an emotional point of view connecting “pixels with people” and “bridging” remote sensing and social sensing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agapiou A, Alexakis D, Sarris A, Hadjimitsis DG (2014) Evaluating the potentials of Sentinel-2 for archaeological perspective. Remote Sens 6(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6032176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agapiou A, Lysandrou V, Lasaponara R, Masini N, Hadjimitsis DG (2016) Study of the variations of archaeological marks at neolithic site of Lucera, Italy using high-resolution multispectral datasets. Remote Sens 8:723. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert M-T (2017) The potential of culture for sustainable development in heritage studies. In: Albert M-T, Bandarin F, Pereira Roders A (eds) Going beyond. Perceptions of sustainability in heritage studies no. 2. Springer, Cham, pp 33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana S (2017) Drones in archaeology. State-of-the-art and future perspectives. Archaeol Prospect 24(4):275–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canuto MA, Estrada-Belli F, Garrison TG et al (2018) Ancient lowland Maya complexity as revealed by airborne laser scanning of northern Guatemala. Science 361:1355

    Google Scholar 

  • Casana J, Kanter J, Wievel A, Cothren J (2014) Archaeological aerial thermography: a case study at the Chaco-era Blue J community, New Mexico. J Archaeol Sci 45:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase AF, Chase DZ, Weishampel JF, Drake JB, Shrestha RL, Slatton KC, Awe J, Carter WE (2011) Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize. J Archaeol Sci 38:387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase ASZ, Chase DZ, Chase AF (2017) LiDAR for archaeological research and the study of historical landscapes. In: Masini N, Soldovieri F (eds) Sensing the past: from artifact to historical site. Springer, New York, pp 89–100

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Masini N, Yang R, Milillo P, Feng D, Lasaponara R (2015) A space view of radar archaeological Marks: first applications of COSMO-SkyMed X-band data. Remote Sens 7:24–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70100024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Masini N, Liu J, You J, Lasaponara R (2016) Multi-frequency satellite radar imaging of cultural heritage: the case studies of the Yumen Frontier Pass and Niya ruins in the Western Regions of the Silk Road Corridor. Int J Digit Earth 9(12):1224–1241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1181213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, You J, Tanh P, Zhou W, Masini N, Lasaponara R (2018) Unique performance of spaceborne SAR remote sensing in cultural heritage applications: overviews and perspectives. Archaeol Prospect 25:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doneus M, Briese C, Fera M, Janner M (2008) Archaeological prospection of forested areas using full-waveform airborne laser scanning. Journal of Archaeological Science 35(4): 882–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doneus M (2013) Openness as visualization technique for interpretative mapping of airborne LiDAR derived digital terrain models. Remote Sens 5:6427–6442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doneus M, Briese C (2006) Full-waveform airborne laser scanning as a tool for archaeological reconnaissance. BAR Int Ser 1568:99

    Google Scholar 

  • Doneus M, Verhoeven G, Atzberger C, Wess M, Ruš M (2014) New ways to extract archaeological information from hyperspectral pixels. J Archaeol Sci 52:84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.08.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfadaly A, Attia W, Qelichi MM, Murgante B, Lasaponara R (2018) Management of cultural heritage sites using remote sensing indices and spatial analysis techniques. Surv Geophys 39(6):1347–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans R, Jones RJA (1977) Crop marks and soils at two archaeological sites in Britain. J Archaeol Sci 4(1):163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DH, Fletcher RJ, Pottier C, Chevance JB, Soutif D, Tan BS, Im S, Ea D et al (2013) Uncovering archaeological landscapes at angkor using LiDAR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:12595–12600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabellone F, Lanorte A, Masini N, Lasaponara R (2017) From remote sensing to a serious game: digital reconstruction of an abandoned medieval village in Southern Italy. J Cult Herit. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse R (2010) LiDAR-derived Local Relief Models a new tool for archaeological prospection. Archaeol Prospect 17:67–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaimaris D. Karadedos G. Georgiadis C. Patias P (2018) Locating and Mapping the Traces of the Covered Ancient Theater of Amphipolis (Eastern Macedonia, Greece). Heritage 1: 306–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalayci T, Lasaponara R, Wainwright J, Masini N (2019) Multispectral Contrast of Archaeological Features: A Quantitative Evaluation. Remote Sens., 11, 913, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11080913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Masini N (2008) Advances in Remote Sensing for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Management, Proc. of I International EARSeL Workshop “Advances in Remote Sensing for Archaeology and Culturale Heritage Management”, Rome 30 September-4 October, 2008, Aracne, Roma, 2008. ISBN: 978-88-548-2030-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Masini N (2009) Full-waveform Airborne Laser Scanning for the detection of medieval archaeological microtopographic relief. J Cult Herit 10S:78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2009.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Masini N (2012) Image Enhancement, Feature Extraction and Geospatial Analysis in an Archaeological Perspective. In: Lasaponara R., Masini N (Eds), Satellite Remote Sensing: a new tool for Archaeology, Springer, Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 978-90-481-8800-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8801-7_2, pp. 17–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Masini N (2014) Beyond modern landscape features: New insights in the archaeological area of Tiwanaku in Bolivia from satellite data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 26:464–471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Masini N (2017) Preserving the past from space: an overview of risk estimation and monitoring tools. In: Masini N, Soldovieri F (eds) Sensing the past. From artifact to historical site. Springer International Publishing, pp 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50518-3_

  • Lasaponara R, Coluzzi R, Gizzi FT, Masini N (2010) On the LiDAR contribution for the archaeological and geomorphological study of a deserted medieval village in Southern Italy. J Geophys Eng 7:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/7/2/S01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Masini N, Pecci A, Perciante A, Pozzi Escot D, Rizzo E, Scavone M, Sileo M (2017) Qualitative evaluation of COSMO SkyMed in the detection of earthen archaeological remains: the case of Pachacamac (Peru). J Cult Herit. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo L, Wang X, Guo H, Lasaponara R, Shi P, Bachagha N, Li L, Yao Y, Masini N, Chen F, Ji W, Cao H, Li C, Hu N (2018) Google earth as a powerful tool for archaeological and cultural heritage applications: a review. Remote Sens 10:1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masini N, Rizzo E, Lasaponara R, Orefici G (2008) Integrated remote sensing techniques for the detection of buried archaeological adobe structures: preliminary results in Cahuachi (Peru), Advances in Geosciences 19:75–82, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-19-75-2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masini N, Lasaponara R (2017) Sensing the past from space: approaches to site detection. In: Masini N, Soldovieri F (eds) Sensing the past. From artifact to historical site. Springer International Publishing, pp 23–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50518-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Masini N, Soldovieri F (2017). Sensing the Past. From artifact to historical site. Geotechnologies and the Environment, Vol. 16. Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50518-3, pp. 575

    Google Scholar 

  • Masini N, Marzo C, Manzari P, Belmonte A, Sabia C, Lasaponara R (2018a) On the characterization of temporal and spatial patterns of archaeological crop-marks. J Cult Herit. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masini N, Gizzi FT, Biscione M, Fundone V, Sedile M, Sileo M, Pecci A, Lacovara B, Lasaponara R (2018b) Medieval archaeology under the canopy with LiDAR. The (re)discovery of a medieval fortified settlement in Southern Italy. Remote Sens 10:1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opitz R, Herrmann J (2018) Recent trends and Long-standing Problems in Archaeological Remote Sensing. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology 1(1):19–41. http://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson TC (1989) History and the post-processual archaeologies. Man 24(4):555–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pescarin S (2015) Virtual museums interacting and augmenting cultural heritage: a European perspective. Lect Notes Comput Sci 9254

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart C (2017) Detection of Archaeological residues in vegetated areas using satellite synthetic aperture radar. Remote Sens 9(2):118. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart C, Oren EO, Cohen-Sasson E (2018) Satellite remote sensing analysis of the Qasrawet archaeological site in North Sinai. Remote Sens 10(7):1090. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DR (1982) Air photo interpretation for archaeologists. St. Martin’s Press, London. https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.1983.11077756

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zakšek K, Oštir K, Kokalj Ž (2011) Sky-view factor as a relief visualization technique. Remote Sens 3:398–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa Lasaponara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lasaponara, R., Masini, N. (2020). Big Earth Data for Cultural Heritage in the Copernicus Era. In: Hadjimitsis, D., et al. Remote Sensing for Archaeology and Cultural Landscapes. Springer Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10979-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics