Skip to main content

Historical Development and the State of Nursing Science in Norway

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 904 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the development and status of nursing science in Norway and to identify and analyse important factors and forces that have impacted that development. This chapter will look at structures and strategies used by key actors to promote the development of nursing science in Norway and facilitate understanding of these in light of important contextual and societal trends. The author has been part of this development for the last 30 years, so the account will obviously be coloured by her experiences and the positions and contexts within which she has worked. The chapter, therefore, is not an ‘objective’ account, although the author has tried to provide an account that gives a reasonable—though quite overarching and general—picture of the developments based on available sources. In the chapter, some key persons who have been essential for the development of nursing science are mentioned, but most of the content focuses, instead, on the developmental factors and social trends; therefore, many people who have had significant impact on nursing science have been left out. This omission in no way minimizes the contributions of these persons to the development of the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Larsen Ø, Alsvik B, Nylenna M, Swärd E. Helse og nasjonsbygging. [Health and Nation building]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nylund M. Rikshospitalets historie. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen. 2012;132:2655. https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.12.1302. Opprinnelig publ.: Sinding-Larsen. Rikshospitalets første hundrede aar. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1926;46:963–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Espedal G, Hovland B. Et Livskald. Cathinka Guldberg. Norges første sykepleier og diakonisse. [A calling for life. Cathinka Guldberg. Norway’s First Nurse and Deaconess]. Oslo: Verbum Publishing Company; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Melby K. Kall og kamp. Norsk sykepleierforbunds historie [Calling and battle. Norwegian Nurses Association’s history]. Cappelen, Oslo; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moseng OG. Fremvekst og profesjonalisering. Norsk sykepleierforbund gjennom 100 år (1912–2012). Bind 1. [The growth and professionalization. Norwegian Nurses Association during 100 years. Volume 1]. Oslo: Akribe Publishing Company; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schram CW, Bjarnar O, Skar SB. Norske kvinners sanitetsforening: tiden og menneskene som skapte den: vekst og virke i femti år: 1896 – 1946. Norske kvinners sanitetsforening 100 år, 1896-1996 B. 1. [The Norwegian women’s association for public health: the times and people creating it. Growth and function during 50 years: 1896–1946]. Oslo: Norske kvinners sanitetsforening; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lønnå E. Women’s rights in Norway from 1913 to 1940. https://snl.no/Kvinners_rettigheter_i_Norge_fra_1913_til_1940. Downloaded on 30.03.2018.

  8. Lønnå E. Norwegian suffrage association. https://snl.no/Norsk_kvinnesaksforening. Downloaded on 30.03.2018.

  9. Lerheim K. Sykepleierutdannelse. Forutsetninger for og linjer I utviklingen av en tidsmessig sykepleierutdannelse I Norge. [Nursing education. Premises for and developmental lines for a timely nursing education in Norway]. In: Festskrift til Helga Dagsland [Book in honour of Helga Dagsland]. Oslo: Norwegian Nurses Association; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hamran T, Normann K. Akademisering av helsefagene [Academization of the health professions]. In: Gamnes J, Rasmussen K, editors. Fra fagområdet medisin til det helsevitenskaplige fakultet [From the medical profession to the faculty of health sciences]. Tromsø: Orkana; 2013. p. 139–50.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stortingsmelding 40. Fra visjon til virke, om høgre utdanning. [From vision to function, about higher education]. White Paper, Ministry of Education; 1990–91.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lund EC. Virke og profesjon. Norsk sykepleierforbund gjennom 100 år (1912–2012). Bind 2. [Function and profession. Norwegian nurses association during 100 years. Volume 2]. Oslo: Akribe Publishing Company; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stortingsmelding 27. Kvalitetsreformen. [The quality reform]. White Paper, Ministry of Education; 2000–2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elstad I. Sjukepleietenkning [Thinking about nursing]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elstad I, Hamran T. Sykdom. Nord-Norge før 1940. [Disease. Northern Norway before 1940]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hamran T. Den tause kunnskapen [The silent knowledge]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Normann HK, Asplund K, Karlsson S, Sandman PO, Norberg A. People with severe dementia exhibit episodes of lucidity. A population-based study. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15(11):1413–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Skaalvik MW, Norberg A, Normann K, Fjelltun AM, Asplund K. The experience of self and threats to sense of self among relatives caring for people with Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia (London). 2016;15(4):467–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301214523438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bondevik M. Sykepleievitenskap i Bergen gjennom 25 år 1979–2004: fra den første visjon til dagens virkelighet: jubileumsskrift [Nursing science in Bergen during 25 years 1979–2004: from the first vision to reality: anniversary book]. Bergen: Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Social Medicine, University of Bergen; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kjønstad A. Er helselover og rettsprinsipper helsebringende? Om rettsliggjøring av velferdsstaten [Are health laws and legal principles health promoting?]. Michael. 2013;10(Suppl 13):71–102.

    Google Scholar 

  21. The Act of 2 July 1999 No 63 relating to Patients’ rights (The Patients’ Rights Act).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Graue M, Wentzel-Larsen T, Hanestad BR, Søvik O. Health-related quality of life and metabolic control in adolescents with diabetes: the role of parental care, control, and involvement. J Pediatr Nurs. 2005;20(5):373–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haltbakk J, Hanestad BR, Hunskaar S. Relevance and variability of the severity of incontinence, and increased daytime and night-time voiding frequency, associated with quality of life in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int. 2005;96(1):83–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wahl AK, Rustøen T, Hanestad BR, Lerdal A, Moum T. Quality of life in the general Norwegian population, measured by the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS-N). Qual Life Res. 2004;13(5):1001–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinsen K, Wærness K. Pleie uten omsorg? Norsk sykepleie mellom pasient og profesjon [Nursing without care? Norwegian nursing between patient and profession]. Oslo: Pax Publishing Company; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alvsvåg H. Har sykepleien en framtid? En kritikk av den teoretiske sykepleien. [Does nursing have a future? A critique of theoretical nursing]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Martinsen K. Omsorg, sykepleie, Medisin. Historisk-filosofiske essey. [Caring, nursing and medicine. Historical-philosophical essays]. Oslo: Tano; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Martinsen K. Fra Marx til Løgstrup. Om etikk og sanselighet i sykepleien. [From Marx to Løgstrup. About ethics and sensitivity in nursing]. Oslo: Tano; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ragnhild Hellesø, May Solveig Fagermoen. The contribution of research-based master’s theses to knowledge building in nursing. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2018;8(11):35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hellesø R, Melby L, Brattheim B, Toussaint P. Exchange of information between hospital and home health care: a longitudinal perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:349–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Henni SH, Kirkevold M, Antypas K, Foss C. The role of advanced geriatric nurses in Norway: a descriptive exploratory study. Int J Older People Nurs. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12188.

  32. Lindberg MF, Rustøen T, Miaskowski C, Rosseland LA, Lerdal A. The relationship between pain with walking and self-rated health 12 months following total knee arthroplasty: a longitudinal study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1430-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lorensen M. Evalueringsrapport av nyopprettet kurs i valgretningen klinisk sykepleie. [Evaluation report of a new course in sub-specialisation in clinical nursing]. Oslo: University of Oslo, Institute of Nursing Science, Oslo; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Portillo MC, Kennedy A, Todorova E, Regaira E, Wensing M, Foss C, Lionis C, Vassilev I, Goev V, Rogers A. Interventions and working relationships of voluntary organisations for diabetes self-management: a cross-national study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;70:58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Svendsen EJ, Moen A, Pedersen R, Bjørk IT. Resistive expressions in preschool children during peripheral vein cannulation in hospitals: a qualitative explorative observational study. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0508-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. The Research Council of Norway. Public health and health-related research. Panel 5. Oslo: The Research Council of Norway; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Meld. St. 18. Konsentrasjon for kvalitet – Strukturreform i universitets- og høyskolesektoren. Tilråding fra Kunnskapsdepartementet 27. mars 2015, godkjent i statsråd samme dag. (Regjeringen Solberg) [Concentration for quality – structural reform in the university- and university college sectors. Whitepaper approved March 27, 2015]; 2014–2015.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gloppestad K. Initial separation time between mothers and their premature infants: a comparison between two periods of time. Vård i Norden [Nordic J Nurs Res]. 1994;14(2–3):17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gloppestad K. Parents’ skin to skin holding of small premature infants: differences between fathers and mothers. Vård i Norden [Nordic J Nurs Res]. 1996;16(1):22–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kirkevold M. Toward a practice theory of caring for patients with chronic skin disease. Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1993;7(1):37–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kirkevold M, Gortner SR, Berg K, Saltvold S. Patterns of recovery among Norwegian heart surgery patients. J Adv Nurs. 1996;24(5):943–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Fagermoen MS, Hamilton G. Preparing patients for urological surgery. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003;40(3):281–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hellesø R, Eines J, Fagermoen MS. The significance of informal caregivers in information management from the perspective of heart failure patients. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(3–4):495–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03927.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Strøm A, Fagermoen MS. User involvement as sharing knowledge – an extended perspective on patient education. J Multidiscip Res. 2014;7:551–9.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Norekvål T. PROCARD research group. Yearly report; 2016. https://helse-bergen.no/seksjon/procard/Documents/Årsmelding%20Procard_2016.pdf.

  46. Hanssen TA. Helsefaglig forskningssatsing i Helse Nord RHF fra 2008 til 2015. Oppsummering og evaluering. [Health-related research strategy in Region North Health Trust from 2008 to 2015]. Internal report; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kirkevold M. Teaching nursing homes: the Norwegian experience 20 years on. J Res Nurs. 2018;23(2–3):254–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge the significant contribution of Senior Lecturer Emerita May Solveig Fagermoen for her review of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marit Kirkevold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kirkevold, M. (2019). Historical Development and the State of Nursing Science in Norway. In: Hafsteinsdóttir, T., Jónsdóttir, H., Kirkevold, M., Leino-Kilpi, H., Lomborg, K., Rahm Hallberg, I. (eds) Leadership in Nursing: Experiences from the European Nordic Countries. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10964-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10964-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10963-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10964-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics