Skip to main content

On Complexity and Exact Solution of Production Groups Formation Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Optimization and Applications (OPTIMA 2018)

Abstract

The success of a modern enterprize is substantially determined by the effectiveness of staff selection and formation of various kinds of functional groups. Creation of such groups requires consideration of different factors depending on the activity of the groups. The problem of production groups formation, considered in this paper, asks for an assignment of workers to jobs taking into account the implicational constraints. The first result of the paper states the NP-hardness of the problem under consideration. The second result is a branch and bound method, which uses supplementary assignment problems for computing bounds. A software implementation of the algorithm is made, and a computational experiment is carried out, comparing the proposed algorithm with the CPLEX solver on randomly generated input data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Afanasyeva, L.D., Kolokolov, A.A.: Design and analysis of algorithm for solving some formation of production groups problems. Omsk Sci. Bull. 2(110), 39–42 (2012). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Afanasyeva, L.D., Kolokolov, A.A.: Study and solution of a production groups formation problem. Vestnik UGATU. 5, 20–25 (2013). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borisovsky, P.A., Delorme, X., Dolgui, A.: Balancing reconfigurable machining lines via a set partitioning model. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(13), 4026–4036 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.849857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burkard, R.E., Dell’Amico, M., Martello, S.: Assignment problems. SIAM, Philadelphia (2009). https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972238

  5. Eremeev, A.V., Kel’manov, A.V., Pyatkin, A.V.: On the complexity of some Euclidean optimal summing problems. Doklady Math. 93(3), 286–288 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562416030157

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Eremeev, A.V., Kel’manov, A.V., Pyatkin, A.V.: On complexity of searching a subset of vectors with shortest average under a cardinality restriction. In: Ignatov, D.I., et al. (eds.) AIST 2016. CCIS, vol. 661, pp. 51–57. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52920-2_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability. A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Il’ev, V., Il’eva, S., Kononov, A.: Short survey on graph correlation clustering with minimization criteria. In: Kochetov, Y., Khachay, M., Beresnev, V., Nurminski, E., Pardalos, P. (eds.) DOOR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9869, pp. 25–36. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44914-2_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolokolov, A.A., Afanasyeva, L.D.: Research of production groups formation problem subject to logical restrictions. J. Siberian Federal Univ. Math. Phys. 6(2), 145–149 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kolokolov, A.A., Rubanova, N.A., Tsygler, I.A.: Research and solution of some small groups formation problems based on discrete optimization. OMSK Sci. Bull. 4(145), 139–142 (2016). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kolokolov, A.A., Rubanova, N.A., Ziegler, I.A.: Solution of personnel management problems with respect to some binary relations. In: Proceedings of 12th International School-Seminar “Optimization Problems of Complex Systems”, Novosibirsk, pp. 278–284 (2016). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kolokolov, A.A., Rubanova, N.A., Ziegler, I.A.: Solution of small production groups formation problems using discrete optimization. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference “Information Technologies for Intelligent Decision Making Support”, (ITIDS 2016), vol. 1, pp. 215–218. UGATU, Ufa (2016). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Novikov, D.A.: Mathematical Models of Teams Building and Functioning. Phismathlit, Moscow (2008). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sigal, I.C., Ivanova, A.P.: Introduction to Applied Discrete Programming. Phismathlit, Moscow (2007). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ziegler, I.A.: On some algorithms of solving goal-oriented groups formation problems. Young Russia Adv. Technol. Ind. 2, 51–53 (2017). OmSTU, Omsk, (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research is supported by RFBR projects 16-01-00740 and 17-07-00513.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Eremeev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

This appendix contains a detailed description of the algorithm CUT from [15]. The number of constraints defined by (4) and (5) can be too large for a straightforward application of a standard ILP algorithm. However, the inequalities may be added gradually, as it is done in cutting plane algorithms. This idea was implemented in the CUT procedure based on the CPLEX package.

Step 0. Solve the root assignment problem (1)–(3), (6) and go to Step 1.

Step 1. If a solution exists then go to Step 2. Otherwise, go to Step 5.

Step 2. If the obtained solution does not satisfy some of the constraints (4), (5) then we add one violated constraint to the current problem and go to Step 3. (The tie-breaking rule is described below.) Otherwise, go to Step 4.

Step 3. Solve the current problem and go to Step 1.

Step 4. The obtained solution is optimal. Stop.

Step 5. Problem (1)–(6) is infeasible. Stop

If several violated constraints (4), (5) are identified in Step 2, we need to choose one constraint to add to the current problem. To this end, for each tuple \(\langle (i,j),(i',j')\rangle \), associated to a violated constraint, we count how many times the index i occurs in other violated constraints (4), (5). Denote this number by \(N_i\). Analogous values \(N_j\), \(N_{i'}\), and \(N_{j'}\) are calculated for \(j, i'\), and \(j'\). Then we assign the weight to each violated inequality, defined as \(N_i+N_j+N_{i'}+N_{j'}\). Finally, we choose the inequality with the maximum weight and add it to the problem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Eremeev, A., Kononov, A., Ziegler, I. (2019). On Complexity and Exact Solution of Production Groups Formation Problem. In: Evtushenko, Y., Jaćimović, M., Khachay, M., Kochetov, Y., Malkova, V., Posypkin, M. (eds) Optimization and Applications. OPTIMA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 974. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10934-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10934-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10933-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10934-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics