Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

British Sociologists and French 'Sociologues' in the Interwar Years pp 67–101Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Rejecting the French: Classical British Sociology at the London School of Economics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 107 Accesses

Abstract

Apart from the Edinburgh School of Sociology led by Patrick Geddes and Victor Branford, a parallel attempt was conducted at the London School of Economics under Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse to devise a proper, un- (if not anti-) Durkheimian discipline called sociology. This was characterised by an Idealist point of view in which the individual was the centre, society seen as an illusion and morality an inner, natural sense. All this denigrated the Durkheimian contribution and was in competition with France. The school following Hobhouse can be described as ‘Classical British sociology’ and was foundational for the interwar decades although it was R. H. Tawney who remained the most influential figure over the LSE sociology—despite never claiming to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Barker, Ernest. 1931. ‘Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse, 1864–1929’. Proceedings of the British Academy 15: 536–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branford, Victor. 1929. ‘The Sociological Work of Leonard Hobhouse’. The Sociological Review 21 (4): 273–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresard, Marcel. 1950. ‘I. Mobilité Sociale et Dimension de La Famille’. Population (French Edition) 5 (3): 533–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, Laurence George. 1934. Report of the Departmental Committee on Sterilisation, Cmnd. 4485. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, Martin. 1981. ‘Sociology and Political Science at Cambridge in the 1920s: An Opportunity Missed and an Opportunity Taken’. The Cambridge Review 27 (April): 156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Saunders, Alexander M. 1922. The Population Problem: A Study in Human Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester, Norman. 1986. Economics, Politics and Social Studies in Oxford, 1900–85. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Church of England, and Archbishops’ Fifth Committee of Inquiry. 1918. Christianity and Industrial Problems: Being the Report of the Archbishops’ Fifth Committee of Inquiry (Part 1). London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, Stefan. 1976. ‘Hobhouse, Bosanquet and the State: Philosophical Idealism and Political Argument in England 1880–1918’. Past & Present 72 (1): 86–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1995. LSE: A History of the London School of Economics and Political Science, 1895–1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, Jill. 1975. ‘The Development of Sociology First Degree Courses at English Universities, 1907–1972’. PhD thesis, London City University, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Ronald. 1971. The Making of Sociology: A Study of Sociological Theory. 2 vols. London: Joseph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, Morris. 1922. ‘The Theory of Progress’. Economica 6: 228–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1927. ‘The Scope of Sociology’. Economica 20: 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1929a. ‘Interchange Between Social Classes’. Economica Journal 39: 554–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1929b. ‘The Contribution of Professor Hobhouse to Philosophy and Sociology’. Economica 27: 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1931. ‘The Place of Instinct in Social Theory’. Economica 31: 25–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1933. ‘Recent Tendencies in Sociology’. Economica 39: 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1939. ‘The Concepts of Juridical and Scientific Law’. Politica 15: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, Alain. 1951. ‘II. Mobilité Sociale et Dimension de La Famille - Enquête Dans Les Lycées et Les Facultés’. Population (French Edition) 6 (1): 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, David V. 1938. ‘Changes in Fertility in England and Wales, 1851 to 1931’. In Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies, edited by Lancelot Thomas Hogben, 161–212. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, David V., and Jerzy Berent. 1954. Social Mobility in Britain. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, David V., and J. L. Gray. 1938. ‘Opportunity and the Older Universities: A Study of the Oxford and Cambridge Scholarship System’. In Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies, edited by Lancelot Thomas Hogben, 418–470. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Lawrence. 1987. ‘A Peculiarity of the English? The Social Science Association and the Absence of Sociology in Nineteenth-Century Britain’. Past and Present 114: 133–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. L., and Pearl Moshinsky. 1938. ‘Ability and Opportunity in English Education’. In Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies, edited by Lancelot Thomas Hogben, 334–376. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Thomas Hill. 1882a. ‘I. Can There Be a Natural Science of Man?’ Mind 7 (25): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1882b. ‘II. Can There Be a Natural Science of Man?’ Mind 7 (26): 161–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Thomas Hill, and Andrew Cecil Bradley. 1882. ‘III. Can There Be a Natural Science of Man?’ Mind 7 (27): 321–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1906. Prolegomena to Ethics. 5th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press [1884].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadow Committee. 1926. The Education of the Adolescent. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H. 2004. A History of Sociology in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, Ernest Bouldin. 1933. ‘Sociology in England’. Social Forces 11 (3): 335–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn, Geoffrey. 1976. Enlightenment and Despair: A History of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobhouse, Leonard Trelawny. 1893. The Labour Movement. London: T. Fisher Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1911. Liberalism. London: Oxford University Press. https://archive.org/download/liberalism00hobh/liberalism00hobh.pdf.

  • ———. 1918. The Metaphysical Theory of the State. London: Allen & Unwin; New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1921. The Rational Good. New York: H. Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1922. The Elements of Social Justice. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1924. Social Development: Its Nature and Conditions. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1951. Morals in Evolution: A Study in Comparative Ethics. London: Chapman & Hall [1906].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobhouse, Leonard Trelawny, G. C. Wheeler, and Morris Ginsberg. 1915. The Material Culture and Social Institutions of the Simpler Peoples: An Essay in Correlation. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, Lancelot Thomas. 1936. Mathematics for the Million. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938a. ‘Introduction to Part II’. In Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies, edited by Lancelot Thomas Hogben, 331–333. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 1938b. Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938c. ‘Prolegomena to Political Arithmetic’. In Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies, edited by Lancelot Thomas Hogben, 13–46. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938d. Science for the Citizen: A Self-Educator Based on the Social Background of Scientific Discovery. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, T. E. B. 1978. Cambridge Between Two Wars. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman, H. M. 1883. The Historical Basis of Socialism in England. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labour Party (Great Britain). 1928. Labour and the Nation. London: Labour Party.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laski, Harold. 1935. ‘Discretionary Power’. Politica 3: 274–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1936. ‘The Judicial Function’. Politica 6: 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord Riddell. 1929. ‘Sterilisation of the Unfit’. Medico-Legal Journal 23: 107–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl. 1934. ‘German Sociology (1918–1933)’. Politica 1 (1): 12–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Thomas Humphrey, ed. 1938a. Class Conflict and Social Stratification: Being the Report of a Conference Held Under the Auspices of the Institute of Sociology at King’s College of Household and Social Science, London, from the 24th to the 26th of September 1937. London: Leplay House Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938b. The Population Problem: The Experts and the Public. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963. Sociology at the Crossroads: And Other Essays. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. ‘The Nature of Class Conflict (1938)’. In Class, Citizenship, and Social Development: Essays, 164–173. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. Right to Welfare and Other Essays. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, William. 1908. An Introduction to Social Psychology. London: Methuen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1920. The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology with Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mess, Henry A. 1937. ‘Modern Alternatives to the Poor Law’. Politica 8: 380–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, William. 1690. Political Arithmetick or a Discourse Concerning, the Extent and Value of Lands, People, Buildings: Husbandry, Manufacture, Commerce, Fishery, Artizans, Seamen, Soldiers; Publick Revenues, Interest, Taxes, Superlucration, Registries, Banks Valuation of Men, Increasing of Seamen, of Militia’s, Harbours, Situation, Shipping, Power at Sea, &c. as the Same Relates to Every Country in General, but More Particularly to the Territories of His Majesty of Great Britain, and His Neighbours of Holland, Zealand, and France. London: Printed for Robert Clavel and Hen. Mortlock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Population Investigation Committee, and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 1948. Maternity in Great Britain: A Survey of Social and Economic Aspects of Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raison, Timothy, and Paul Barker. 1979. ‘L. T. Hobhouse’. In The Founding Fathers of Social Science: A Series from New Society, 195–203. London: Scolar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, Natalie. 1953. ‘Social Stratification in France and in the United States’. American Journal of Sociology 58 (4): 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankey Commission. 1919. Coal Industry Commission Act 1919, Second Stage. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, Henry. 1880. ‘Mr. Spencer’s Ethical System’. Mind 5 (18): 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, Reba N. 1982. ‘Why Do Disciplines Fail? The Strange Case of British Sociology’. The English Historical Review 97 (385): 767–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, Pitirim A. 1927. Social Mobility. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studholme, Maggie. 1997. ‘From Leonard Hobhouse to Tony Blair: A Sociological Connection?’ Sociology 31 (3): 531–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, Richard Henry. 1912. The Agrarian Problem in the Sixteenth Century. London and New York: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1921. The Acquisitive Society. London: Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1922. Secondary Education for All: A Policy for Labour. Edited for the Education Advisory Committee of the Labour Party. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1926. Religion and the Rise of Capitalism: A Historical Study. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. Equality (with a New Introduction by Richard M. Titmuss). London: Unwin Books [1931].

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, Richard Henry, and Socialist League. 1934. The Choice Before the Labour Party. London: The Socialist League.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Sidney. 1937. ‘A Basis for Political Science?’ Politica 9: 480–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1967. ‘The Basis of Socialism—Historic’. In Fabian Essays in Socialism, edited by G. Bernard Shaw, William Clarke, Graham Wallas, and Sidney Webb, 46–83. Gloucester: P. Smith [1889].

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, Edward. 1906. The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas. London and New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1921. The History of Human Marriage. 5th ed. London: Macmillan [1893].

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1936. ‘Methods in Social Anthropology’. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 66: 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younghusband, Francis. 1925. ‘The Sense of Society’. The Sociological Review 17 (1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

    Baudry Rocquin

Authors
  1. Baudry Rocquin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rocquin, B. (2019). Rejecting the French: Classical British Sociology at the London School of Economics. In: British Sociologists and French 'Sociologues' in the Interwar Years . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10913-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10913-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10912-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10913-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation