Skip to main content

4 Demography of Gender

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Population

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Over the last four decades, there has been a major shift in the way demographers think about issues of gender; the field has gone from a seeming lack of awareness that many demographic events are closely connected to gender to a nearly required nod to the relevance of gender. However, although headway has been made, the last few decades have seen interest and attention to gender wax and wane. Drawing from mainstream demography, I demonstrate the progress that the field has made, both in understanding the importance of gender and in developing empirical support for the role of gender in demographic processes. By drawing from population-related research outside the strict confines of the field of demography, this chapter also suggests how demography might move further in understanding gender by drawing from the insights into epistemological and methodological challenges faced by scholars who study gender. I argue that demographers might productively both borrow from and contribute to these conversations about gender, enriching demography’s work on gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In his Presidential Address to the Population Association of America in the early 1990s, Richard Udry (1994) emphasized and attempted to trace the biological origins of some gender differences. This chapter will focus on gender as a social construction, even while recognizing the obvious biological influences on human behavior.

  2. 2.

    Gender has been part of many analyses presented at PAA conferences but is not often an explicit organizing theme. After 2003, the subject “gender” was subsumed under a new heading: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender (and sometimes, as in 2008, interestingly, Race, Ethnicity, Gender and Religion).

  3. 3.

    These panels are established by the IUSSP council, often after being proposed by members. They organize programs and work in the subject area of the panel. They are meant “to address an emerging or critical population issue or to develop and improve training and research in the population field. They consist of a small international group of high level experts” (IUSSP website (npn): https://iussp.org/en/what-are-iussp-scientific-panels)

  4. 4.

    Other research has underscored the instability of measures of gendered power in other ways. Ghuman, et al. (2001), in analyzing data from five Asian countries, came to question the reliability and even validity of measures of autonomy; measures of women’s power to make economic decisions, their freedom of movement, their control over household resources, and attitudes about gender equality did not hold up to scrutiny across different societies, within communities nor even between wives and husbands.

  5. 5.

    The authors argued that had they been able to control for other key variables such as race/ethnicity and income, the relationship would have been further weakened.

  6. 6.

    Violence against women has drawn some attention from demographers, as a 1999 Population Reports testifies (Heise, et al. 1999). See also Wies and Haldane 2018; Brunson 2011; Jackson et al. 2015).

  7. 7.

    Demographers have not ignored the importance of women’s power (or empowerment) although in general, research is focused on it as it relates to demographic change (for example, among many others, see Mason 1995: 22; Jejeebhoy and Sathar 2001: 709; Riley 1997a; Riley and DeGraff 2018).

References

  • Abu-Lhod, L. (1990). The Romance of Resistance: tracing transformation of power through Bedouin Women. American Ethnologist, 17 (1), 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adedini S.A., Odimegwu C., Imasiku E.N., Ononokpono D.N. & Ibisomi, L. (2014). Regional Variations in Infant and Child Mortality in Nigeria: A Multilevel Analysis. Journal of Biosocial Science, 10,1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adema, W. (2012). Setting the scene: The mix of family policy objectives and packages across the OECD. Children & Youth Services Review, 34 (3), 487–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, V. ed. (2016). Metrics: What Counts in Global Health. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcoff, L., and E. Potter, eds. (1993). Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemayehu, Y. K., Theall, K., Lemma, W., Hajito, K. W., & Tushune, K. (2015). The Role of Empowerment in the Association between a Woman’s Educational Status and Infant Mortality in Ethiopia: Secondary Analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys. Ethiopian Journal Of Health Sciences, 25 (4), 353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkema, L., Chou, D., Hogan, D., Zhang, S., Moller, A.-B., Gemmill, A.,... Say, L. (2015). Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. The Lancet, 387 (10017), 462–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. and Kohler, H. (2015). Low Fertility, Socioeconomic Development, and Gender Equity. Population & Development Review, 41 (3), 381–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angus, I. (2011). Too Many People? Population, Immigration, and the Environmental Crisis. Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anker, R. (1994). Measuring women’s participation in the African labour force. In A. Adepoju and C. Oppong (Eds), Gender, work and population in sub-Saharan Africa. (pp. 64–75). London: James Currey, for ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, C. (2001). How can thinking about gender help us do better science? Presented at Population Association Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C., 29 March 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balk, D. (1994). Individual and community aspects of women’s status and fertility in rural Bangladesh. Population Studies, 48 (1), 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balk, D. (1997). Defying gender norms in rural Bangladesh: A social demographic analysis. Population Studies, 51 (2),153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M. and Phillips, A. eds. (1992a). Introduction. In M. Barrett and A. Phillips (Eds), Destabilizing theory: Contemporary feminist debates (pp. 1–9). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M., and Phillips, A. eds. (1992b). Destabilizing theory: Contemporary feminist debates. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. and Basu, K. (1991). Women’s economic roles and child survival: The case of India. Health Transition Review, 1 (2), 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. (2015). Does Schooling Affect Women’s Desired Fertility? Evidence From Malawi, Uganda, and Ethiopia. Demography, 52 (3), 787–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birke, L. and Vines, G. (1987). Beyond nature vs. nurture. Women’s Studies International Forum, 10 (6), 555–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwood, E. (2000). Webs of Power: Women, kin, and community in a Sumatran village. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, A., Wolff, B., Gage, A. Ezeh, A. Neema, S. and Ssekamatte-Ssebuliba, J. (1996). Negotiating reproductive health outcomes in Uganda. Calverton, MD: Macro International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, S., Wypij, D, and Das Gupta, M. (2001). Dimensions of women’s autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a North India city. Demography, 38 (1), 7–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, K. (2011). Reproducing Race: An Ethnography of Pregnancy as a Site of Racialization. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L. (2002). Reproducing Empire: Race, Sex, Science and US Imperialism in Puerto Rico. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L. (2017). How All Politics Became Reproductive Politics. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1995). States of injury. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Browner, C. H. (1986). The politics of reproduction in a Mexican village. Signs, 11 (4), 710–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, J. (2010). Confronting Maternal Mortality, Controlling Birth in Nepal: The Gendered Politics of Receiving Biomedical Care at Birth. Social Science and Medicine, 71(10), 1719–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, J. (2011). Moving Away from Marital Violence: Nepali Mothers Who Refuse to Stay. Practicing Anthropology, 33 (3), 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, J. (2016). Planning Families in Nepal: Global and Local Projects of Reproduction. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, J. (2018). Maternal health in Nepal and other low-income countries: Causes, contexts, and future directions. In N.E. Riley and J. Brunson (Eds.), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (pp.141–152) Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. (1991). Widows, sons and old-age security in rural Maharashtra. Population Studies, 45 (3), 519–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M., Khanam, S. and Nahar, S. (1979). Class, patriarchy, and women’s work in Bangladesh. Population and Development Review, 5 (3), 405–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. (1993). Patriarchal structure and demographic change. In Federici, K. O. Mason, and S. Sogner (Eds.), Women’s position and demographic change (pp. 43–60). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. (1979). Education as a factor in mortality decline: An examination of Nigerian data. Population Studies, 33 (3), 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. (1986). Routes to low mortality in poor countries. Population and Development Review, 12 (2), 171–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. (1994). How is greater maternal education translated into lower child mortality? Health Transition Review, 4 (2), 224–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro Martin, T. (1995). Women’s education and fertility: Results from 26 demographic and health surveys. Studies in Family Planning, 26 (4),187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charbit, Y. (2018). “Women as actors in addressing climate change.” In N.E. Riley and J. Brunson (Eds.), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (pp. 317–328). Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, N., and Riley, N.E. (2001). Planning an Indian modernity: The gendered politics of fertility control. Signs, 26 (3), 811–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, N., and Riley, N. E. (2018). “Women, Biopower and the Making of Demographic Knowledge: India’s Demographic and Health Survey.” In N.E. Riley and J. Brunson (Eds.), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (pp. 37–54). Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesnais, J. (1996). Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary Western Europe. Population and Development Review, 22 (4),729–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Kim. (2012). Gender, State, and Medicine in Highland Ecuador: Modernizing Women, Modernizing the State, 1895–1950. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J. and van Ginneken, J. (1988). Maternal education and child survival in developing countries: The search for pathways of influence. Social Science and Medicine, 27 (12),1357–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J., and G. Rodriguez. 1988. The effect of parental education on marital fertility in developing countries. Population Studies 42:419–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J., and Wilson, C. (1987). Demand theories of the fertility transition: An iconoclastic view. Population Studies, 41 (1), 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, Sharyn. (2003). Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, S. (1979). Fertility and education: What do we really know? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, S. (1983). Effects of education and urbanization on fertility. In R. Bulatao & R. Lee (Eds.), Determinants of fertility in developing countries 2 (pp. 587–626). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, M. (2008). Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable, N. (2014). Born Out of Place: Migrant Mothers and the Politics of International Labor. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, L. P. (2009). Gender Equity and Fertility in Italy and Spain. Journal Of Social Policy, 38(1), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., Gideon, J. & Wilson, K. (2008). Introduction: Reclaiming feminism: gender and neoliberalism. IDS Bulletin, 39 (6), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, W.Y. (2010). Mother or nothing: the agony of infertility. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 88, 881–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cukut, S. (2007). Understanding Fertility, Work and Family Through a Gender Lens: A Case Study. Anthropological Notebooks, 13 (2), 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dales, L. (2018). Marriage in Contemporary Japan. In N.E. Riley and J. Brunson (Eds.), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (pp. 287–298). Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeny, P. (1988). Social science and population policy. Population and Development Review, 14 (3), 451–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S.(2000). Maternal education and child health: A feminist dilemma. Feminist Studies, 26 (2), 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S., and S. Alva. (1998). Maternal education and child health: Is there a strong causal relationship? Demography, 35 (1),71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S. and L. Andrist. (2010). “Gender Scripts and Age at Marriage in India.” Demography 47 (3), 667–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S., and D. Jain. (1994). Maternal employment and family dynamics: The social context of women’s work in rural South India. Population and Development Review, 20 (1),115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S. and Johnson, K. (2005). Women’s decisionmaking and child health: familial and social hierarchies.” In S. Kishor (Ed.), A Focus on Gender: Collected Papers on Gender Using DHS Data (pp. 55–68). Calverton, MD: ORC Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S., & Temsah, G. (2014). Muslim and Hindu Women’s Public and Private Behaviors: Gender, Family, and Communalized Politics in India. Demography, 51 (6), 2307–2332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, Majorie. (1996). “Talking Back to Sociology: Distinctive Contributions of Feminist Methodology.” Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (2017). “Feminist qualitative research: emerging lines of inquiry.” In N. Denzin and Y, Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th edition (pp. 176–194). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deveaux, M. (1994). Feminism and empowerment: A critical reading of Foucault. Feminist Studies 20 (2); 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. (1982). Women in agriculture: Counting the labor force in developing countries. Population and Development Review, 8 (3):539–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Mueller, R. (1993). Population policy and women’s rights: Transforming reproductive choice. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Mueller, R., and Germain, A. (2000). Reproductive health and the demographic imagination. In H. Presser and G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 69–94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommermuth, L., Hohmann-Marriott, B., & Lappegård, T. (2017). Gender Equality in the Family and Childbearing. Journal Of Family Issues, 38 (13), 1803–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, V. and Sathar, Z. (2000). Greater investments in children through women’s empowerment: A key to demographic change in Pakistan? New York: Population Council Policy Research Division Working Papers, No. 137.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K. and Kefalas, M. (2007). Promises I Can Keep. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Dawla, A. S. (2000). Reproductive rights of Egyptian women: Issues for debate. Reproductive Health Matters, 8 (15), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, P. (2010). The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled. Gender & Society, 24 (2),149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errington, S. (1990). Recasting sex, gender and power: A theoretical and regional overview. In J. Atkinson and S. Errington (Eds.) Power and difference: Gender in island southeast Asia (pp.1–58). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (1997). Introducing Contemporary Feminist Thought. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, N., Mason, K. O. & Sogner, S.(Eds.) (1993). Women’s position and demographic change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family history. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52 (4): 866–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M., Lorber, J. and Hess, B. (1999). Revisioning Gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (1994). Who pays for the kids? Gender and the structures of constraint. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (2001). The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonow, M. and Cook, J. (Eds.). (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, L. P., and Isaacs, S. (1993). Human rights and reproductive choice. Studies in Family Planning, 24 (1), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, F. (1997). Population and development: A critical introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghuman, S., Lee, H. and Smith, H. (2001). Measurement of female autonomy according to women and their husbands: Results from five Asian countries. Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meetings, April 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, F. D. (1989). Contested lives: The abortion debate in an American community. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E. N., Chang, G. & Forcey, L. R. (Eds.). (1994). Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (1990). Toward a political economy of fertility: Anthropological contributions. Population and Development Review, 16(1), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (1994). Controlling births and bodies in village China. American Ethnologist, 21 (1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (1995). Anthropology theorizes reproduction: Integrating practice, political, economic, and feminist perspectives. In S. Greenhalgh (Eds), Situating fertility: Anthropology and demographic inquiry (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (1996). The social construction of population science: An intellectual, institutional, and political history of 20th century demography. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 38, (1), 26–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (1997). Methods and meanings: Reflections on disciplinary difference. Population and Development Review, 23(4), 819–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (2001). The discursive turn in the study of gender and population. Population of Association Annual Meeting. March 2001. Panel presentation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (2012). On the Crafting of Population Knowledge. Population and Development Review, 38 (1), 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S., and Li, J. (1995). Engendering reproductive policy and practice in peasant China: For a feminist demography of reproduction. Signs, 20 (3), 601–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajizadeh M, Nandi, A., and Heymann, J. (2014). Social inequality in infant mortality: what explains variation across low and middle income countries? Social science & medicine, 101, 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2006). Gender and Social Inequality: Feminist and Postcolonial Issues. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, S.K., Zweimueller, S., Marchena, C, & Hoel, E. (2014). Women’s Lives and Challenges: Equality and Empowerment since 2000. Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, L., Ellsberg, M. & Gottemoeller, M. (1999). Ending violence against women. Population Reports Series L, No. 11. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Population Information Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, E. B. (1992). African-American women’s history and the metalanguage of race. Signs, 17 (2), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A., Pallitto, C., McCleary-Sills, J., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2016). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy and Selected Birth Outcomes. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 133 (3), 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, M., and Keller, E.F. (Eds.) (1990). Conflicts in feminism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D. (1983). Demography as Social Science and Policy Science. Population and Development Review, 9 (1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D. (1988). Orthodoxy and Revisionism in American Demography. Population and Development Review, 14 (4), 541–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D. and Watkins, S. C. (1997). Feminists and Neo-Malthusians: Past and Present Alliances. Population & Development Review, 23 (3), 469–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D., Berhanu, B. & Hailemariam, A. (1999). Household organization, women’s autonomy, and contraceptive behavior in southern Ethiopia. Studies in Family Planning, 30 (4), 302–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idowu, A. E., Osinaike, M. O., & Ajayi, M. P. (2011). Maternal Health Challenges And Prospects For National Development: A Case-Study Of Badagry Local Government, Lagos State. Gender & Behaviour, 9 (2), 4224–4246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. (1996). Infertility and patriarchy: The cultural politics of gender and family life in Egypt. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2015). Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojorns in Global Dubai. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ivry, T. (2009). Embodying Culture: Pregnancy in Japan and Israel. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. L., Ciciolla, L., Crnic, K. A., Luecken, L. J., Gonzales, N. A., & Coonrod, D. V. (2015). Intimate Partner Violence Before and During Pregnancy: Related Demographic and Psychosocial Factors and Postpartum Depressive Symptoms among Mexican American Women. Journal of interpersonal violence, 30 (4), 659–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratne, T., and Stewart, A. (1991). Quantitative and qualitative methods in the social sciences: Current feminist issues and practical strategies. In M. Fonow and J. Cook (Eds), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 85–106). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jejeebhoy, S. (1995). Women’s education, autonomy, and reproductive behavior: Experience from developing countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jejeebhoy, S. (1998). Associations between wife-beating and fetal and infant death: Impressions from a survey in rural India. Studies in Family Planning, 29 (3), 300–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jejeebhoy, S., and Sathar, Z. A. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27 (4), 687–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetter, A., Orleck, A. and Taylor, D. (Eds.). 1997. The politics of motherhood: Activist voices from left to right. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Hanks, J. (2018). When The Wages Of Sin Is Death: Sexual Stigma And Infant

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortality In Sub-Saharan Africa. In N.E. Riley and J. Brunson (Eds.), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (pp. 153–164). Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed realities. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievement: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30 (3), 435–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanaaneh, Rhoda Ann (2002). Birthing the Nation: Strategies of Palestinian Women in Israel. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, G., and Cleland, J. (1994). Maternal education and child survival: Anthropological responses to demographic evidence. Health Transition Review, 4 (2), 196–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1989). Just what is so difficult about the concept of gender as a social category? (Response to Richards and Schuster). Social Studies of Science, 19 (4), 721–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1986). Family and society. In Women, history, and theory: The essays of Joan Kelly (pp. 110–156). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, D., and T. Fricke. (1997). Toward anthropological demography. In D. I. Kertzer and T. Fricke (Eds.), Anthropological demography: Toward a new synthesis (pp. 1–35). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L. (2018). Gender in the investigation and politics of ‘low’ fertility. In N. E. Riley & J. Brunson (Eds.), International handbook on gender and demographic processes (pp. 55–69). Springer Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, S. (1993). May God give sons to all: Gender and child mortality in India. American Sociological Review, 58 (2), 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, S. (1994). Autonomy and Egyptian Women: Findings from the 1988 Egypt demographic and health survey. Occasional Papers, No. 2. Demographic and Health Surveys, Calverton, Md.: Macro International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, S. (2000). Empowerment of women in Egypt and links to the survival and health of their infants. In H. Presser and G. Sen (Eds), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 118–156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, S. (Ed.). (2005). A Focus on Gender: Collected Papers on Gender Using DHS Data. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, S. and Neitzel, K. (1996). The Status of Women: Indicators for Twenty-Five Countries. DHS Comparative Studies No. 21. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Macro International

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, S., and Parasuraman, S. (1998). Mother employment and infant and child mortality in India. National Family Health Survey Subject Reports. No. 8. Mumbai and Calverton, Md.: Institute for Population Sciences and Macro International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, S. and Subaiya, L. (2008). Understanding Women’s Empowerment: A Comparative Analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Data. DHS Comparative Reports No. 20. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Macro International

    Google Scholar 

  • Komter, A. (1989). Hidden Power in Marriage. Gender and Society, 3 (2), 187–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, E. L. (2001). “Empty cradles” and the quiet revolution: Demographic discourse and cultural. Cultural Anthropology (Wiley-Blackwell), 16(4), 576–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, E. L. (2006). Dangerous Demographies: The Scientific Manufacture of Fear. Corner House, Briefing #36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, E. L. (2018). Reproduction in Retrospective, Or What’s All the Fuss over Low Fertility? In N.E. Riley and J. Brunson (Eds.), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (pp. 73–82). Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, E. L. and De Zordo, S. (2012). Introduction. Ethnography and biopolitics: tracing ‘rationalities’ of reproduction across the north–south divide. Anthropology & Medicine, 19(2), 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuan, T. (2015). Love’s Uncertainty: The Politics and Ethics of Childrearing in Contemporary China. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, E. (1994). Negotiating lesbian motherhood: The dialectics of resistance and accommodation. In E. Glenn, G. Chang, and L. Forcey (Eds), Mothering: Ideology, experience, agency (pp. 333–353). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. (1991). The contribution of the world fertility surveys to an understanding of the relationship between women’s work and fertility. Studies in Family Planning, 22 (3),144–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luker, K. (1985). Abortion and the politics of motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maine, D., and Rosenfield, A. (1999). The safe motherhood initiative: Why has it stalled? American Journal of Public Health, 89 (4), 480–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchesi, M. (2012). Reproducing Italians: Contested biopolitics in the age of ‘replacement anxiety’. Anthropology & Medicine, 19(2), 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (1989). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O. (1993). The impact of women’s position on demographic change during the course of development. In N. Federici, K. O. Mason, and S. Sogner (Eds.) Women’s position and demographic change (pp. 19–42). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O. (1995). Gender and demographic change: What do we know? IUSSP Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O., and Jensen, A. (Eds.). 1995. Gender and family change in industrialized countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O., and Smith, H. L. (2000). Husbands’ versus wives’ fertility goals and use of contraception: The influence of gender context in five Asian countries. Demography, 37 (3), 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O., and Taj, A.M. (1987). Differences between women’s and men’s reproductive goals in developing countries. Population and Development Review, 13 (4), 611–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, M. (1994). Methods, practice, and epistemology: The debate about feminism and research. In M. Maynard and J. Purvis (Eds.), Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 10–26). New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, M., and Purvis, J. (Eds.). 1994. Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, C. (2017). Figuring the Population Bomb: Gender and Demography in the Mid-twentieth Century. University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. and Maine, D. (1992). A framework for analyzing the determinants of maternal mortality. Studies in Family Planning, 23 (1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial leather: Race, gender, and sexuality in the colonial contest. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, C. A., and Finkle, J. (1995). The Cairo Conference on Population and Development: A new paradigm? Population and Development Review, 21(2), 223–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNicoll, G. (1992). The agenda of population studies: A commentary and complaint. Population and Development Review, 18 (3), 399–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina, Jose. (2012). The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice and Resistant Imaginations. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, Sally. (2016). The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishtal, J. (2012). Irrational non-reproduction? The ‘dying nation’ and the postsocialist logics of declining motherhood in Poland. Anthropology & Medicine, 19 (2), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In C. Mohanty, A. Russo, and L. Torres (Eds.), Third world women and the politics of feminism (pp. 51–80). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. (1994). A passion for difference: Essays in anthropology and gender. Oxford: Polity Press (Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. M., & Roberts, E. F. (2012). Reproductive governance in Latin America. Anthropology & Medicine, 19 (2), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. P., and Niraula, B. B. (1995). Gender inequality and fertility in two Nepali villages. Population and Development Review, 21 (3), 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, W. H., and Chen, L. (1984). An analytical framework for the study of child survival in developing countries. Population and Development Review (Supplement to Vol. 10: Child Survival: Strategies for Research), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhuri, P., Blanc, A. & Rutstein, S. (1994). Socioeconomic differentials in fertility. Demographic and health surveys comparative studies No. 13. Calverton, Md.: Macro International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. (2012). Seizing the Means of Reproduction: Entanglements of Feminism, Health, and Technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Michelle. (2017). The Economization of Life. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawar, L., Lloyd, C. & Ibrahim, B. (1995). Women’s autonomy and gender roles in Egyptian families. In by C. Obermeyer (Ed.), Family, gender, and population in the Middle East: Policies in context (pp. 147–178). Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Barr, J., Pope, D. & Wyer, M. (Eds.). (1990). Ties that bind: Essays on mothering and patriarchy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermeyer, C. M. (1992). Islam, women, and politics: The demography of Arab countries. Population and Development Review, 18 (1): 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermeyer, C. M. (1993). Culture, maternal health care, and women’s status: A comparison of Morocco and Tunisia. Studies in Family Planning, 24 (6), 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, Virginia. (2017). “Feminist qualitative research in the millenium’s first decade.” in N. Denzin and Y, Lincoln (Eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th edition (pp. 151–175). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppong, C. (1994). Introduction. In A. Adepoju and C. Oppong (Eds), Gender, work, and population in sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 1–16). Geneva: International Labour Office, by James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osili, U. O., & Long, B. T. (2008). Does female schooling reduce fertility? Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Development Economics, 87 (1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parreñas, R. (2005). Children of Global Migration: Transnational Families and Gendered Woes. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petchesky, R. P. (1997). Spiraling discourses of reproductive and sexual rights: A post-Beijing assessment of international politics. In C. Cohen, K. Jones, and J. Tronto (Eds.), Women transforming politics (pp. 569– 587). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petchesky, R. P. (2000). Human rights, reproductive health and economic justice: Why they are indivisible. Reproductive Health Matters, 8 (15),12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinnelli, A. (1995). Women’s condition, low fertility, and emerging union patterns in Europe. In K. O. Mason and A. M. Jensen (Eds), Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries (pp. 82–101). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (1997). Demography, feminism, and the science-policy nexus. Population and Development Review, 23 (2), 295–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H., and Sen, G. (2000). Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Laying the groundwork. In H. Presser and G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, S. I., Ramanathan, M. and Mishra, U.S. (1996). Female autonomy and reproductive behaviour in Kerala: New evidence from the recent Kerala Fertility Survey. In R. Jeffery and A. Basu (Eds.), Girls’ schooling, women’s autonomy and fertility change in South Asia, (pp. 268–287). New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V., and Bloch, F. (1993). Wife-beating, its causes and its implications for nutrition allocations to children: An economic and anthropological case study of a rural South Indian community. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, Policy Research Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, T. (2017). “Review: Metrics (Vincanne Adams).” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 90 (1), 147–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renne, E. (1993). Gender ideology and fertility strategies in an Ekiti Yoruba village. Studies in Family Planning, 24 (6), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1979). Of Woman Born. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. E. (1997). Gender, power and population change. Population Bulletin, 52. Washington, D.C.: Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. E. (1998). Research on gender in demography: Limitations and constraints. Population Research and Policy Review, 17 (6), 521–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. E. (1999). Challenging demography: Contributions from feminist theory. Sociological Forum, 14 (3), 369–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. E. (2003). Gender. Encyclopedia of Population. New York: Macmillan Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley N.E. (2005) Demography of Gender. In: Poston D.L., Micklin M. (Eds) Handbook of Population (pp. 109–141). Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley. N.E. (2018a). Stratified reproduction. In N.E. Riley and J. Brunson (Eds.), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (pp. 117–138). Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. E. (2018b). Gender inequality in low-fertility societies: what does China’s experience teach us? In D. Poston (Ed.), Low Fertility Regimes and Demographic and Societal Change (pp. 115–132). Springer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N.E. and J. Brunson (2018). Introduction. In N.E. Riley and J. Brunson (Eds.), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (pp. 1–11). Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N.E. and D. DeGraff (2018). Measuring Gender in the Context of Demographic Change. In N.E. Riley and J. Brunson (Eds.), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (pp. 15–36). Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. E., and J. McCarthy. (2003). Demography in the age of the postmodern. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R. R., and Brewster, K.L. (1996). Childrearing and Fertility. In J. Casterline, R. Lee, and K. Foote (Eds.), Fertility in the United States: New patterns, new theories, (pp. 258–289). New York: Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (1998). Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (2002). Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. S. (2016). Japan’s Evolving Family: Voices from Young Urban Adults Navigating Change. Honolulu: East-West Center Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield, A., Min, C. J., & Freedman, L. P. (2007). Making Motherhood Safe in Developing Countries. New England Journal of Medicine, 356 (14), 1395–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, B. K. (2000). Recreating motherhood. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathar, Z., Crook, N. Callum, C. & Kazi, S. (1988). Women’s status and fertility change in Pakistan. Population and Development Review, 14 (3), 415–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, E. (2003). Comparing, Contextualizing, and Conceptualizing: Enhancing Quantitative Data on Women’s Situation in Rural Africa Demographic Research Special Collection 1, Article 5, 143-174 (19 September 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, E., & Williams, J. (2012). Measuring gender and reproductive health in Africa using demographic and health surveys: the need for mixed-methods research. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 14 (7), 811–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, N. (1992). Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, N. (1997). Demography without numbers. In D. I. Kertzer and T. Fricke (Eds.), Anthropological demography: Toward a new synthesis (pp. 201–222). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review, 91 (5), 1053–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1988a). Deconstructing equality-vs-difference: Or, the uses of post-structuralist theory for feminism. Feminist Studies, 14 (1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1988b). Gender and the politics of history. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, G., and Batliwala, S. (2000). Empowering women for reproductive rights. In H. Presser and G. Sen (Eds), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo, (pp. 15–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharps, P. W., Laughon, K., & Giangrande, S. K. (2007). Intimate Partner Violence and the Childbearing Year: Maternal and Infant Health Consequences. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8 (2), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., and Casterline, J. (1985). The socio-economic determinants of fertility. In J. Cleland and J. Hobcraft (Eds.), Reproductive change in developing countries: Insights from the world fertility survey (pp. 199–222). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. 1989. Integrating theory and research on the institutional determinants of fertility. Demography 26:171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spar, D. (2006). The Baby Business. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, E. (1988). Inessential woman. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. (2008). Opting Out? Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Lynn M. (2003). Politics of the Womb: Women, reproduction and the state in Kenya. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, L. and Scott, J. (1987). Women, work, and family. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuya, N. (2000). Women’s empowerment, marriage postponement, and gender relations in Japan: An intergenerational perspective. In H. Presser and G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 318–348). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuya, N. (2017). Low fertility in Japan—No End in Sight. Asia-Pacific Issues. No 131. Honolulu: East-West Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuana, N. (1983). Re-fusing nature/nurture. Women’s Studies International Forum, 6 (6), 621–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R. (1994). The nature of gender. Demography, 31 (4), 561–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. (2017). Finding Women in the State. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, V., Maine, D. & McCarthy, J. (1994). A strategy for the evaluation of activities to reduce maternal mortality in developing countries. Evaluation Review, 18 (4),:438–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. In J. Gubrium and J. Holstein (Eds.) Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 83–102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, S. (1993). If all we knew about women were what we read in Demography, what would we know? Demography, 30 (4), 551–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, S. C., Rutenberg, N. and Wilkinson, D. 1997. Orderly theories, disorderly women. In G. W. Jones, R. M. Douglas, J. C. Caldwell, and R. M. D’Souza (Eds.), The continuing demographic transition (pp. 213–245). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, M. B., Lloyd, C. and Blanc, A. (1989). Women’s education and fertility: A decade of change in four Latin American countries. International Family Planning Perspectives, 15 (1), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendland, C. (2016). Estimating death: a close reading of maternal mortality metrics in Malawi. In V. Adams (Ed.), Metrics: What Counts in Global Health (pp. 57–81). Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C. (1994). What’s the world priority task? Finally, control population. New York Times (Feb 6).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. (2000). Domination, resistance, and accommodation in China’s one child campaign. In E. Perry and M. Selden (Eds.) Chinese society: Change, conflict, and resistance (pp. 102–119). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2016). Maternal Mortality Fact Sheet. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/

    Google Scholar 

  • Wies, J. R and Haldane, H.J. (2018). Structures of Violence throughout the Life Course: Cross-Cultural Perspectives of Gender-Based Violence. In N.E. Riley and J. Brunson (Eds.), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (pp. 329–340). Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. (2008). Reclaiming ’agency,’ reasserting resistance. IDS Bulletin 39, (6), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. (2018). Unconceived Territory: Involuntary Childlessness and Infertility among Women in the United States. In N.E. Riley and J. Brunson (Eds.), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (pp. 95–104). Springer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. R. (2010). Doing feminist-demography. International Journal Of Social Research Methodology, 13 (3), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (1972). Women and the family in rural Taiwan. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, A. E., and Maine, D. (1999). Maternal mortality as a human rights issue: Measuring compliance with international treaty obligations. Human Rights Quarterly, 21 (3), 563–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanagisako, S., and Collier, J. (1987). Toward a unified analysis of gender and kinship. In J. Collier and S. Yanagisako (Eds.) Gender and kinship: Essays toward a unified analysis (pp. 14–50). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, B. and Morgan, S. P. (2017). The second demographic transition theory: review and appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology 43, 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy E. Riley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Riley, N.E. (2019). 4 Demography of Gender. In: Poston, D.L. (eds) Handbook of Population. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10910-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10910-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10909-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10910-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics