Skip to main content

The Domestication of Smart Toys: Perceptions and Practices of Young Children and Their Parents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Internet of Toys

Part of the book series: Studies in Childhood and Youth ((SCY))

Abstract

This chapter discusses how smart toys are being adopted in homes with young children (under 10), using domestication theory (Silverstone and Hirsch in Consuming Technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. Routledge, London, 1992) as the framework. We report on a qualitative exploratory study aiming to understand the different domestication stages—appropriation, objectification, incorporation and conversion. Our method consisted of visits to a purposive sample of 21 families, combining interviews, activities and non-participant observation. Our findings reveal that parents have mixed perceptions about smart toys—they value their educational potential but fear an excess of technological play and consider them expensive. We found smart toys in a few homes, observing early stages of domestication, with smart toys becoming part of an “ecosystem” of other toys and activities, but still with a “novelty” status.

An earlier version of this work was published in the British Journal of Educational Technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y., & Ward, K. (2006). Domestication of media and technology. London: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, London, and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito, R., Francisco, R., Dias, P., & Chaudron, S. (2017). Family dynamics in digital homes: The role played by parental mediation in young children’s digital practices around 14 European countries. Contemporary Family Therapy,39(4), 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D. (2016). Changing media, homes and households: Cultures, technologies and meanings. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2004). Grounded theory. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research (pp. 496–521). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudron, S., Beutel, M. E., Černikova, M., Donoso, V., Dreier, M., … & Wölfling, K. (2015). Young children (0–8) and digital technology: A qualitative exploratory study across seven countries. JRC 93239/EUR 27052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudron, S., Di Gioia, R., Gemo, M., Holloway, D., Marsh, J., Mascheroni, G., … Yamada-Rice, D. (2017). Kaleidoscope on the internet of toys—Safety, security, privacy and societal insights. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/TtuntC.

  • Chen, Z. H., Liao, C., Chien, T. C., & Chan, T. W. (2011). Animal companions: Fostering children’s effort-making by nurturing virtual pets. British Journal of Educational Technology,42(1), 166–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, S. L., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2015). Parental co-use of media technology with their young children in the USA. Journal of Children and Media,9, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. Maidenhead, England and New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias, P., & Brito, R. (2016). Crianças (0 a 8 anos) e Tecnologias Digitais. Lisboa: Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/19160.

  • Dias, P., & Brito, R. (2017). Crianças (0 a 8 anos) e Tecnologias Digitais: Que mudanças num ano? Lisboa: Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/22498.

  • Dias, P., Brito, R., Ribbens, W., Daniela, L., Rubene, Z., Dreier, M., … Chaudron, S. (2016). The role of parents in the engagement of young children with digital technologies: Exploring tensions between rights of access and protection, from ‘gatekeepers’ to ‘scaffolders’. Global Studies of Childhood, 6(4), 414–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drotner, K. (1999). Dangerous media? Panic discourses and dilemmas of Modernity. International Journal of the History of Education,35(3), 593–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddon, L. (2006). The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society,22, 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddon, L. (2011). Domestication analysis, objects of study, and the centrality of technologies in everyday life. Canadian Journal of Communication,36(2), 311–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepp, A., & Krotz, F. (Eds.). (2014). Mediatized worlds: Culture and society in a media age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D., & Green, L. (2016). The internet of toys. Communication Research and Practice,2(4), 506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D., & Green, L. (2017). Mediated memory making: The virtual family photograph album. Communications,44(3), 351–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D. J., Green, L., & Stevenson, K. (2015, August). Digitods: Toddlers, touch screens and Australian family life. M/C Journal, 18(5). ISSN 14412616. (Special Issue). Available at http://www.journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/1024. Accessed 21 December 2018.

  • Katz, J., & Aakhus, M. (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2017). Marketing 4.0: Moving from traditional to digital. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucirnova, N., & Sakr, M. (2015). Child-father creative text-making at home with crayons, iPad collage and PC. Thinking Skills and Creativity,17, 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, M. A., & Prothero, A. (2011). Pester power: A battle of wills between children and their parents. Journal of Marketing Management,27(5), 551–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S., & Lagae, K. (2015). How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. EU Kids online. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/6rvdhe.

  • Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication,67(1), 82–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media & Society,19(5), 657–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorente & Cuenca. (2017). Consumer engagement trends for 2017: The phygital era. Retrieved from http://www.desarrollando-ideas.com.

  • Marsh, J. (Ed.). (2005). Popular culture, new media and digital literacy in early childhood. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J. (2017). The internet of toys: A posthuman and multimodal analysis of connected play. Teachers College Record, 119. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/113557/14/38_22073.pdf.

  • Mascheroni, G., & Holloway, D. (Eds.). (2017). The internet of toys: A report on media and social discourses around young children and IoToys. DigiLitEY. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/2C1VsR.

  • Mitskavets, I. (2015). Children and teens as influencers. London: Mintel. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/C9Mkcf.

  • Mukherji, P., & Albon, D. (2010). Research methods in early childhood: An introductory guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children’s internet use. Learning, Media and Technology,39(2), 250–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom. (2017). Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/BrmPF2.

  • Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education,38, 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, A. (2012). The methodology of sampling and purposive sampling. Berlin: Grin Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuver, M., Nikou, S., & Bouwman, H. (2016). Domestication of smartphones and mobile applications: A quantitative mixed-method study. Mobile Media & Communication,4(3), 347–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosin, H. (2013). The touch-screen generation. The Atlantic, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change in everyday life. In R. Silverstone & R. Mansell (Eds.), Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 44–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, R., & Hirsch, E. (Eds.). (1992). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcke, M., Bonte, S., Wener, B., & Rots, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education,55(2), 454–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. (2002). Beeldschermkinderen: Theorieën over kind en media [Screen-kids: Theories about children and media]. Amsterdam: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, J. (2006). Emotional attachment and mobile phones. Knowledge, Technology & Policy,19(1), 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Kuo, V., King, C., & Chang, C. (2010). Internet of toys: An e-Pet overview and proposed innovative social toy service platform. Computer Symposium (ICS). Tainan, 16–18 December. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/aR4b89.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrícia Dias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brito, R., Dias, P., Oliveira, G. (2019). The Domestication of Smart Toys: Perceptions and Practices of Young Children and Their Parents. In: Mascheroni, G., Holloway, D. (eds) The Internet of Toys. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10898-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10898-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10897-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10898-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics