Skip to main content

Hybrid Methods for Hybrid Play: A Research Toolkit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Internet of Toys

Part of the book series: Studies in Childhood and Youth ((SCY))

Abstract

In this chapter we outline a research toolkit for the study of Internet-connected toys and their processual and situated affordances. We account for the complex and varied ways in which connected toys, children, adults and media infrastructures interrelate and interact to form systems of meaning and ensembles of technologies and agency, which constitute the digital materialities and social practices of connected play. This toolkit of research methods uses an ethnographic methodology but is informed by two epistemological approaches—phenomenological and non-representational. Thus, this toolkit takes into account the sociocultural context, materiality and symbolic dimensions of connected toy use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarsand, P. (2016). Children’s media practices: Challenges and dilemmas for the qualitative researcher. Journal of Children and Media,10(1), 90–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barassi, V. (2017). BabyVeillance? Expecting parents, online surveillance and the cultural specificity of pregnancy apps. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, H. (2005). Asking the tough questions: A guide to ethical practices in interviewing young children. Early Child Development and Care,175(6), 597–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudron, S., et al. (2018). Rules of engagement: Family rules on young children’s access to and use of technologies. In S. Danby, M. Fleer, C. Davidson, & M. Hatzigianni (Eds.), Digital childhoods: International perspectives on early childhood education and development (pp. 131–145). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P., & Prout, A. (2002). Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood,9(4), 477–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, E. (2018). Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society, online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics,14(2), 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. L., & Chouinard, J. B. (2016). Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society,36(4), 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Madsen, A. K., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (2013). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. Second Edition (1st ed., 1997). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,22(1), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., Stevenson, K., Holloway, D., et al. (2017). Like mother, like daughter? Unboxing an Etsy childhood. In M. Dezuanni (Ed.), At home with digital media. Brisbane: QUT Digital Media Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddon, L., & Holloway D. (2018). Parental evaluations of young children’s touchscreen technologies. In G. Mascheroni (Ed.), Nordicom 2018 yearbook on digital parenting. Gothenburg: Nordic Information Centre for Media and Cmmunication Research (Nordicom).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D., & Green, L. (2016). The internet of toys. Communication Research and Practice,2(4), 506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D., & Stevenson, K. (2017). Parent as field collaborator when interviewing the pre-verbal and early verbal child. DigiLitEY Blog. Retrieved from https://digilitey.wordpress.com/2017/01/24/parent-as-field-collaborator-when-interviewing-the-pre-verbal-and-early-verbal-child/.

  • Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology,35(2), 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby, I. (2014). Communicative affordances and participation frameworks in mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics,72, 86–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, D., & San Juan, V. (2015). Play-based interview methods for exploring young children’s perspectives on inclusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,28(5), 610–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. (2006). Introduction to the first edition (2002): The social shaping and consequences of ICTs. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media (pp. 15–32). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society,20(3), 881–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manches, A., Duncan, P., Plowman, L., & Sabeti, S. (2015). Three questions about the internet of things and children. TechTrends,59(1), 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J. (2017). The internet of toys: A posthuman and multimodal analysis of connected play. Teachers College Record,119(15), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J., Hannon, P., Lewis, M., & Ritchie, L. (2017). Young children’s initiation into family literacy practices in the digital age. Journal of Early Childhood Research,15(1), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J.C., … Winter, P. (2015). Exploring play and creativity in pre-schoolers’ use of apps: Final project report. Retrieved from www.techandplay.org.

  • Mascheroni, G., & Holloway, D. (Eds.). (2017). The internet of toys: A report on media and social discourses around young children and IoToys. DigiLitEY. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from http://digilitey.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/IoToys-June-2017-reduced.pdf.

  • Noppari, E., Uusitalo, N., & Kupiainen, R. (2017). Talk to me! Possibilities of constructing children’s voices in the domestic research context. Childhood,24(1), 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., & Mackley, K. L. (2012). Video and a sense of the invisible: Approaching domestic energy consumption through the sensory home. Sociological Research Online, 17(1), 3. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/1/3.html.

  • Pink, S., & Mackley, K. L. (2014). Re-enactment methodologies for everyday life research: Art therapy insights for video ethnography. Visual Studies,29(2), 146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., Ardèvol, E., & Lanzeni, D. (Eds.). (2016a). Digital materialities: Design and anthropology. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016b). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, L., & Stevenson, O. (2012). Using mobile phone diaries to explore children’s everyday lives. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 19(4), 539–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyrou, S. (2017). Time to decenter childhood? Childhood,24(4), 433–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storm-Mathisen, A. (2016). Grasping children’s media practices—theoretical and methodological challenges. Journal of Children and Media,10(1), 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance and Society,12(2), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology,30(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna Mascheroni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mascheroni, G., Holloway, D. (2019). Hybrid Methods for Hybrid Play: A Research Toolkit. In: Mascheroni, G., Holloway, D. (eds) The Internet of Toys. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10898-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10898-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10897-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10898-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics