Abstract
In this chapter we outline a research toolkit for the study of Internet-connected toys and their processual and situated affordances. We account for the complex and varied ways in which connected toys, children, adults and media infrastructures interrelate and interact to form systems of meaning and ensembles of technologies and agency, which constitute the digital materialities and social practices of connected play. This toolkit of research methods uses an ethnographic methodology but is informed by two epistemological approaches—phenomenological and non-representational. Thus, this toolkit takes into account the sociocultural context, materiality and symbolic dimensions of connected toy use.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aarsand, P. (2016). Children’s media practices: Challenges and dilemmas for the qualitative researcher. Journal of Children and Media,10(1), 90–97.
Barassi, V. (2017). BabyVeillance? Expecting parents, online surveillance and the cultural specificity of pregnancy apps. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707188.
Cameron, H. (2005). Asking the tough questions: A guide to ethical practices in interviewing young children. Early Child Development and Care,175(6), 597–610.
Chaudron, S., et al. (2018). Rules of engagement: Family rules on young children’s access to and use of technologies. In S. Danby, M. Fleer, C. Davidson, & M. Hatzigianni (Eds.), Digital childhoods: International perspectives on early childhood education and development (pp. 131–145). Singapore: Springer.
Christensen, P., & Prout, A. (2002). Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood,9(4), 477–497.
Costa, E. (2018). Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society, online first.
Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics,14(2), 115–132.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity.
Davis, J. L., & Chouinard, J. B. (2016). Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society,36(4), 241–248.
Du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Madsen, A. K., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (2013). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. Second Edition (1st ed., 1997). London: Sage.
Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,22(1), 35–52.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Green, L., Stevenson, K., Holloway, D., et al. (2017). Like mother, like daughter? Unboxing an Etsy childhood. In M. Dezuanni (Ed.), At home with digital media. Brisbane: QUT Digital Media Research Centre.
Haddon, L., & Holloway D. (2018). Parental evaluations of young children’s touchscreen technologies. In G. Mascheroni (Ed.), Nordicom 2018 yearbook on digital parenting. Gothenburg: Nordic Information Centre for Media and Cmmunication Research (Nordicom).
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury.
Holloway, D., & Green, L. (2016). The internet of toys. Communication Research and Practice,2(4), 506–519.
Holloway, D., & Stevenson, K. (2017). Parent as field collaborator when interviewing the pre-verbal and early verbal child. DigiLitEY Blog. Retrieved from https://digilitey.wordpress.com/2017/01/24/parent-as-field-collaborator-when-interviewing-the-pre-verbal-and-early-verbal-child/.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology,35(2), 441–456.
Hutchby, I. (2014). Communicative affordances and participation frameworks in mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics,72, 86–89.
Koller, D., & San Juan, V. (2015). Play-based interview methods for exploring young children’s perspectives on inclusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,28(5), 610–631.
Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. (2006). Introduction to the first edition (2002): The social shaping and consequences of ICTs. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media (pp. 15–32). London: Sage.
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society,20(3), 881–900.
Manches, A., Duncan, P., Plowman, L., & Sabeti, S. (2015). Three questions about the internet of things and children. TechTrends,59(1), 76–83.
Marsh, J. (2017). The internet of toys: A posthuman and multimodal analysis of connected play. Teachers College Record,119(15), 1–32.
Marsh, J., Hannon, P., Lewis, M., & Ritchie, L. (2017). Young children’s initiation into family literacy practices in the digital age. Journal of Early Childhood Research,15(1), 47–60.
Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J.C., … Winter, P. (2015). Exploring play and creativity in pre-schoolers’ use of apps: Final project report. Retrieved from www.techandplay.org.
Mascheroni, G., & Holloway, D. (Eds.). (2017). The internet of toys: A report on media and social discourses around young children and IoToys. DigiLitEY. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from http://digilitey.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/IoToys-June-2017-reduced.pdf.
Noppari, E., Uusitalo, N., & Kupiainen, R. (2017). Talk to me! Possibilities of constructing children’s voices in the domestic research context. Childhood,24(1), 68–83.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Pink, S., & Mackley, K. L. (2012). Video and a sense of the invisible: Approaching domestic energy consumption through the sensory home. Sociological Research Online, 17(1), 3. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/1/3.html.
Pink, S., & Mackley, K. L. (2014). Re-enactment methodologies for everyday life research: Art therapy insights for video ethnography. Visual Studies,29(2), 146–154.
Pink, S., Ardèvol, E., & Lanzeni, D. (Eds.). (2016a). Digital materialities: Design and anthropology. London: Bloomsbury.
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016b). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. London: Sage.
Plowman, L., & Stevenson, O. (2012). Using mobile phone diaries to explore children’s everyday lives. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 19(4), 539–553.
Spyrou, S. (2017). Time to decenter childhood? Childhood,24(4), 433–437.
Storm-Mathisen, A. (2016). Grasping children’s media practices—theoretical and methodological challenges. Journal of Children and Media,10(1), 81–89.
van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance and Society,12(2), 197–208.
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology,30(1), 75–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mascheroni, G., Holloway, D. (2019). Hybrid Methods for Hybrid Play: A Research Toolkit. In: Mascheroni, G., Holloway, D. (eds) The Internet of Toys. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10898-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10898-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10897-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10898-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)